User talk:Eastmain/Archive 13

Archives

Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 4. Archive 5. Archive 6. Archive 7. Archive 8. Archive 9. Archive 10. Archive 11. Archive 12. Archive 13.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sarcoidosis Vasculitis and Diffuse Lung Diseases, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarcoidosis Vasculitis and Diffuse Lung Diseases".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert Baughman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I have recently made some additions to the UAA page, which you did some work on last year. Feel free come by and make additions or remove anything you see as inappropriate for Wikipedia. Geographyinitiative (talk) 23:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that triplicate. We're not sure what's going on with our curation tool...hope it's not me. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 22:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:State Railway of Thailand Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eastmain, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brampton Board of Trade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CHFI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:State Railway of Thailand Logo 2019.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Commission scolaire de Montreal Logo K.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Helena Estrada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:National Police Cadet Corps Logo 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Precision and Future Medicine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ASSIA Logo no tag 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3rd Gymnasium of Agia Paraskevi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd Gymnasium of Agia Paraskevi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Place Clichy (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:Historic places in Estonia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Helena Estrada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please look at this? Somebody wants to merge "Peer learning" and "learning by teaching". I don't understand why "Learning by teaching" ever is menaced! Thank you very much! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Learning_by_teaching Jeanpol (talk) 09:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Jeanpol (talk) 09:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaarel Liidak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kaarel Liidak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wisconsin Ovarian Cancer Alliance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this is a notable organization. GHIts limited to "donations may be made.."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 16:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wisconsin Ovarian Cancer Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Ovarian Cancer Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StarM 18:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dapto High School Logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aji Senior Secondary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This was created at a time when all secondary schools were considered notable. This school clearly isnt. There are 0 references, and couldn't find any online either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daiyusha (talk) 05:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm obviously doing something wrong when searching WorldCat so curious of the query used because when I do a search there for "Los Angeles Review", I get a 2015 version that isn't listed as being in any library. Slywriter (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Slywriter: I looked up the ISSN at the Library of Congress' catalog, and then searched for 1543-3536 at Worldcat. Just clicking on ISSN 1543-3536 should give you the same results.. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Greaves Cotton Ltd. corporate logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Australian College of Pharmacy Logo 200x40.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Management Studies, Ghaziabad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vikram Vincent 13:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White House Grammar School, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White House Grammar School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Constitutional Council (Cambodia), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 04:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wanted to respond to your comment that the "deals reported on by reliable sources are significantly more than "run-of-the-mill" events" - can you clarify what you mean? The acquisitions included in this entry explain how the company was built and includes links to Wikipedia pages for the companies they were purchased from - PennWell, Informa, etc. Additionally, all of these citations were from verifiable news sources-Folio Magazine, Nashville Post, etc.

And yes, the Google Streetview image you noted is correct - 331 54th Ave N., Nashville, TN 37209, is a commercial space that looks like a house. The reason this is the company headquarters is because this is the building the executive leadership leased when they started the company with a much smaller staff. Endeavor Business Media now has offices in multiple locations throughout the country. The company was in the process of remodeling several of these offices before Covid put a pause on these plans.

Regarding your request for more reference, there is more information on the company website but I was previously discouraged from including links to the actual company website. If you have any advice on how I can improve this, please let me know. Thank you for your help! Abigail Christine (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^[1] Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HeinzMaster was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Techwear and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Techwear, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HeinzMaster (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HeinzMaster (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pierre Boucher de la Bruère, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Gill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horizon Technologies, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horizon Technologies (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star trak real time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INIT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Avalon Rail has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable defunct company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 22:40, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eastmain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Saaberie Chishty Society, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:40, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eastmain:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2600 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.[reply]

You said grammys and other notable awards equal notability. That’s what I thought. Thanks for confirming, I’ll try not to nominate pages with the criteria again. Anywhere where I can find a list of “notable awards”? Dronebogus (talk) 13:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Dronebogus: Please see Category:Music awards by country and Category:American music awards. There are a great many notable music awards around the world. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CentralWashingtonUniversitySeal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anacortes High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog (talk) 10:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beano Video has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Barbara Jo Rubin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 17:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merlin Coverley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Merlin Coverley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isola (Company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brevik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Death of Michael DeVine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Death of Michael DeVine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:50, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Dan arndt:. The article is not just about the killing. It is also about the coverup, and the media coverage extends over a period of time. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The Times of India is not generally reliable and interviews do not contribute to notablity.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shweta Bhattacharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shweta Bhattacharya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Synergy Marine Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Irma Brenman Pick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 10:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication that the subject meets WP:NARTIST

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christina West and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christina West, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 07:54, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George E. Valley Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:George E. Valley Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JavaHurricane 10:17, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Péter Fülöp (ceramist), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Péter Fülöp (ceramist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy O'Connor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:17, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Andreessen. You might want to have a look at a very similar one created for his wife, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen. Edwardx (talk) 10:15, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Edwardx: Done. Thank you for the suggestion. You may want to comment at the AfD. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eastmain

I noticed that recent edits by Citation bot have included AFC categories suggest by you. Those for recent AFCs make some sense to me, because those are drafts which are due for scrutiny, and the bot may help with that. But the latest batch of bot edits includes all of Category:AfC submissions by date/04 February 2021, suggested by you.

Unfortunately, the bot has limited capacity, so en.wp is best served by directing it towards wherever it has maximum benefit. There are a few job series being fed to it which concentrate articles identified as having issues which the bot can fix, where it has a high success rate. Jobs which don't improve the 'pedia displace or delay the jobs which do.

So it seems to me that processing all of Category:AfC submissions by date/04 February 2021 is not a great use of the bot. Those drafts are now over 8 months old, and after that long they will probably have a very low rate of being accepted. I did a quick check using https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=19912694, which shows that 81 of the 84 draft-space pages in that category have already been declined. Wouldn't it be better to let the bot work on live articles, rather than old declined drafts? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @BrownHairedGirl: You're probably right, but some of the February 4 articles which were declined are salvageable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  @Eastmain: Thaks for the prompt reply.

  Yes some will be salvageable, but the proportion which will actually be salvaged is going to be very low. So instead of having of the bot process them all, wouldn't it be better for anyone who tries to salvage one of those drafts to just feed that individual article to the bot?

  If we assume that the 85 pages in the Feb 4 cat is about average, that means that in Jan-June 2021 there are about 14,000 stale drafts. Feeding them all to the bot would occupy it for about two days if it was doing nothing else.

  I am not persuaded that having the bot process all new AFC submissions is a great idea, since a significant proportion of them will never get to article space. But stale drafts seems to me to give a very low return on the bot's time. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Eastmain

I see that the latest bot contribs include the bot working its way through the 176 drafts in Category:AfC submissions by date/23 August 2021. But a quick Petscan check shows that 132 of those AfC submissions have already been declined. As above, that seems pointless.

I don't think the bot should be fed any batches of drafts; better for a reviewer to do them individually if that helps them. But if you are going to set the bot to work on batches of drafts, please can you at least exclude those which have already been declined? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS this bot edit[1] shows that you also ran the bot over the same Category:AfC submissions by date/23 August 2021 only three days ago, on 23 August.

Over 70% of published articles have never been touched by the bot. It makes no sense to me to divert it away from published articles into drafts, let alone to a second pass on mostly-declined drafts. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And again. This set of bot edits shows a webform batch of 23 pages submitted by you. Only 7 of the 23 pages were edited by the bot, and 5 of those are declined submissions: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gulraiz Aslam

This draft was declined[7] by User:Nomadicghumakkad as non-notable at 1:43 today, who promptly tagged it for speedy deletion as spam.[8].

Yet 26 minutes later (at 02:09) it was processed by Citation bot, at Eastmain's suggestion.[9] Why was the bot sent to polish the refs on a spammy draft tagged for speedy deletion? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:17, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Rise and Fall of the Brown Buffalo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 01:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. je vois que vous êtes Canadien et que vous parlez français. Merci pour vos recherches pour trouver des noms de lieux sur l'atoll de Nonouti qui ne correspondent pas à des villages mais à de simples bâtiments (un dispensaire, une résidence privée). Il n'existe aucun dispensaire de Nonouti qui pourrait faire l'objet d'un article sur Wikipédia. Désolé (et merci encore de vos efforts pour sauver des articles qui ont été jugés comme inexistants depuis 2015 (par un autre que moi). Bien à vous.--Arorae (talk) 22:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what a silent answer! not one word in a week? my remarks were not interesting for you?--Arorae (talk) 21:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exit (comics), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exit (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gaurie Dwivedi

added a link pointing to Economic Times

Susan Cruse

added a link pointing to Absent Friends

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lambodar Mahto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grazmach Tameru Lemma is not a public figure so Wikipedia users except me don't know him. The article is written from family knowledge I didn't read articles or newspapers which talked about him and plus there are none. So I write through family links. And because of this no other Wikipeidan user can edit it because they don't have the knowledge first of all to contribute to the article. I wish you understand common sense. And because i told you the truth don't block or attack me. Thanks.

		The Original Barnstar
		Here’s a barnstar for you for helping me on Emery Nelson syndrome. CycoMa (talk) 06:18, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @CycoMa:. Thank you. Often rare disorders such as Emery Nelson syndrome have associations to help finance research and provide patient support that may be worth mentioning in the article, but I couldn't find one for Emery Nelson syndrome. Eastmain (talk • contribs)

Eastmain that’s probably because there haven’t been any new cases since the 1970s.CycoMa (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hannah Green (British author). Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nimble Australia. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tilhar railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern Railway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ELEM/Youth in Distress in Israel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ELEM/Youth in Distress in Israel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ghost towns in Garfield County, Washington indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've added reference from a news paper as you had asked. Rsakib188 (talk) 21:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]