Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wisconsin Ovarian Cancer Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin Ovarian Cancer Alliance

Wisconsin Ovarian Cancer Alliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD declined (Courtesy @Eastmain:). I am unable to find significant, in depth coverage of this organization and it's work to establish notability. StarM 18:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. StarM 18:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. StarM 18:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. StarM 18:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Despite sources added they are trivial mentions of the organization and do not meet WP:ORGDEPTH. Most states have alliances, not just for cancer but for other diseases as well, but generally they are not notable. JayJay^{What did I do?} 21:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep. Google news has about 4 pages of results, mostly are passing mentions, but I think there is enough to show significant coverage and popularity. Webmaster862 (talk) 02:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment can you please clarify which represent significant, in-depth coverage? All I have been able to locate are passing mentions and obituaries where donations were made. Nothing close to WP:ORG. StarM 16:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep As per above, passes WP:BASIC. Akronowner (talk) 15:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Blocked sock. MER-C 12:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.