Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Leaf Market (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True Leaf Market

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous AfD was sock-produced; turns out much of the content was likewise produced by a now-blocked UPE--and I see now that there is quite a bit of spamming done by UPEs. Notability is highly questionable, besides the promotion: Google proves the company exists, but I see nothing proving notability per GNG or NCORP. Drmies (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Utah. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As a company it should be meeting NCORP, and we certainly don't have NCORP sources. I found product/catalog mentions, including in a number of books. However these are not significant coverage. They are just saying you can buy seeds there. Not notable. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, User:Sirfurboy, the history suggests it seems they paid someone to say a lot more, once upon a time. ;) Drmies (talk) 22:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Also can't find SigCov, burn the promo BrigadierG (talk) 18:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Still a delete. This [1] is about a person from the company acting as a local expert on a tv program, not really enough for notability. Rest is not enough, even in what's the article is not enough. Oaktree b (talk) 01:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. An article that doesn't meet SIGCOV for verifiability! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sources in the article do not significantly cover the content of the article and there is not any other sources. Dejaqo (talk) 20:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.