User talk:Oaktree b

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. You can learn more on the how to edit page. The naming conventions and style guide pages are also useful. There is a sandbox which you can use to experiment in.

If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. Angela 02:43, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, Oaktree b! I am Alpha Quadrant and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

Alpha Quadrant ^talk 04:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

An editor says that something's wrong with this page. That editor can't be troubled to fix it, but can sleep easy knowing that they stuck on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly why it's there.

-made by user [[1]] 7&6=thriteen

Great addition! Thanks for it! — HarringtonSmith (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

The content on the actual Wikipedia articles has to be neutral.

But the WMF project and its affiliates CAN and SHOULD oppose political actions that would hamper the writing of the encyclopedia WhisperToMe (talk) 10:02, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

On 30 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Singleton (songwriter), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Charles Singleton wrote the lyrics for "Strangers in the Night", a song Frank Sinatra initially called "a piece of shit"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Singleton (songwriter). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 16:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the picture of Ida. I hope that the 'deletion squad' do not find some spurious reason to remove it. Cheers from Old Blighty.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oaktree! Thank you for the translation of this articles. Can you please check the translation of the lemma as there was only this horse burial on the grave fiels of Wulfsen, primarily it was a human burial site with one isolated bural of 3 horses. Thanks --Bullenwächter (talk) 18:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the complete translation and moved the article to Wulfsen horse burial --Bullenwächter (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oaktree b. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Tobacco science. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Tobacco. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tobacco – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Eeekster (talk) 21:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:General lemonnier.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating the article on this journal! We certainly can use more editors creating such articles, a many notable journals are still not covered. Writing good articles on journals is not hard, see our journal article writing guide for some helpful tips (and I also have some useful links on my userpage]]. Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 10:46, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating George Ethelbert Carter, Oaktree b!

Wikipedia editor Ad Orientem just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article

To reply, leave a comment on Ad Orientem's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joris Bert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joris Bert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spanneraol (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please can you point me to the policy where it states that public domain text can be copied verbatim? Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:57, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Nice addition BeowulfBrower (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Domaine de Marie (Da Lat) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed this nomination and found some plagiarism concerns so cannot pass it right now. My comments are on the nomination page. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 03:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Asian Month Barnstar
	Thanks for your great contribution in Wikipedia Asian Month 2015! --AddisWang (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Domaine de Marie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 08:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Domaine de Marie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Suzanne Humbert, the wife of French Governor of Indochina Jean Decoux, is buried in the Domaine de Marie Catholic convent (pictured) in Da Lat, Vietnam? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Domaine de Marie. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	Thank you so much for participating in Translating Ibero-American!
	From Wikimedia Argentina we would like to thank you for participating in the contest Translating Ibero-America ¡We hope to see you soon in our next contest!

--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! You have more than 4 accepted articles in Wikipedia Asian Month! Please submit your mailing address (not the email) via this google form. This form is only accessed by me and your username will not distribute to the local community to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. Please contact your local organizers if you have any question. Best, Addis Wang, sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. At the moment we have not received your response on the address collection. Sorry for the inconvenience if you did submit the form before. If you still wish to receive the postcard from Wikipedia Asian Month, please submit your mailing address (not the email) via this google form. This form is only accessed by me and your username will not distribute to the local community to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems of using the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email.

If you do not wish to share your personal information and do not want to receive the postcard, please let me know at my meta talk page so I will not keep sending reminders to you. Best, Addis Wang, sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:04, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, I write to you because you were interested in Wiki Loves Earth in Canada before. Canada is participating in the contest in 2017. If you are interested in helping organizing the contest, please contact me, thanks, Amqui (talk) 16:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Lion Pagoda of Kumjang Hermitage, Oaktree b!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Could do with an image.

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mifter (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Oaktree b,
Hope this message finds you well!
Again this year 2017 the Iberocoop network is launching the editing contest "Translating Ibero-American" aiming to position the Ibero-american culture outside our borders :)
You can find the contest page here
We hope you can join us!
Hugs--Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 20:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Oaktree b for writing 3 new articles, expanding 8 and making other quality improvements during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.25% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for December: Seasonal celebrations First ladies Go local #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining up. If you ever need any help, just let me know on my talk page.--Ipigott (talk) 09:00, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Shelburne Public Library (Ontario), Oaktree b!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article on Shelburne Library. It would be helpful to add services at the library and the coordinates (lat long) of the building. Thanks very much for you contribution.

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 08:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Congratulations! You have more than 4 accepted articles in Wikipedia Asian Month! Please submit your postal mailing address via Google form or email me about that on erick@asianmonth.wiki before the end of Janauary, 2018. The Wikimedia Asian Month team only has access to this form, and we will only share your address with local affiliates to send postcards. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. Please contact your local organizers if you have any question. We apologize for the delay in sending this form to you, this year we will make sure that you will receive your postcard from WAM. If you've not received a postcard from last year's WAM, Please let us know. All ambassadors will receive an electronic certificate from the team. Be sure to fill out your email if you are enlisted Ambassadors list.

Best, Erick Guan (talk)

Hi there. This is a reminder to fill the address collection. Sorry for the inconvenience if you did submit the form before. If you still wish to receive the postcard from Wikipedia Asian Month, please submit your postal mailing address via this Google form. This form is only accessed by WAM international team. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems in accessing the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email.

If you do not wish to share your personal information and do not want to receive the postcard, please let us know at WAM talk page so I will not keep sending reminders to you. Best, Sailesh Patnaik

Hello again, I believe the earlier message has created some confusion. If you have already submitted the details in the Google form, it has been accepted, you don't need to submit it again. The earlier reminder is for those who haven't yet submitted their Google form or if they any alternate way to provide their address. I apologize for creating the confusion. Thanks-Sailesh Patnaik

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 14:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 21:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its second anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016 (which you haven't already added to the list). Thanks! – Reidgreg (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Oaktree b for creating 3 new articles, expanding 7 and making other quality improvements during the second year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 20:13, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hector Rail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vectron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kevin from Wikipedia Asian Month here. Thank you very much for your contributions this year. Because you have created at least 4 eligible articles, you are qualified to receive a special WAM postcard from an Asian community. If you would like one, please fill out this form by January 10. All personal information you submit will only be visible to select organizers in charge of postcards, and will be destroyed once postcards are sent out. If you have any questions, please drop a line on my talk page or ping me. Thank you, and happy holidays! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent diagram! Did you construct that yourself, or did you find it somewhere? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome book. Had to be published around 1923, when Yankee Stadium was new and the Polo Grounds was being expanded. It reminds me of a similar publication that Chicago theaters used to produce, in the 1970s or 1980s. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third anniversary. You are receiving this message because you participated in previous years of the challenge but have not yet submitted any article improvements for this year. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved, ensuring that all submissions are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors in November.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or go the challenge page at WP:CAN10K for more information. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Reidgreg (talk) and WP:CAN10K, 21:03, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Oaktree b for writing two new articles and expanding a half-dozen others during the third year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Participants and Organizers,

Congratulations!

It's WAM's honor to have you all participated in Wikipedia Asian Month 2019, the fifth edition of WAM. Your achievements were fabulous, and all the articles you created make the world can know more about Asia in different languages! Here we, the WAM International team, would like to say thank you for your contribution also cheer for you that you are eligible for the postcard of Wikipedia Asian Month 2019. Please kindly fill the form, let the postcard can send to you asap!

Cheers!

Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Participants and Organizers,

Kindly remind you that we only collect the information for WAM postcard 31/01/2019 UTC 23:59. If you haven't filled the google form, please fill it asap. If you already completed the form, please stay tun, wait for the postcard and tracking emails.

Cheers!

Thank you and best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team 2020.01

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all participants and organizers,

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, all the postcards are postponed due to the shut down of the postal system all over the world. Hope all the postcards can arrive as soon as the postal system return and please take good care.

Best regards,

Wikipedia Asian Month International Team 2020.03

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsune Ishida Nachie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsune Ishida Nachie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Participants and Organizers,

Because of the COVID19 pandemic, there are a lot of countries’ international postal systems not reopened yet. We would like to send all the participants digital postcards and digital certifications for organizers to your email account in the upcoming weeks. For the paper ones, we will track the latest status of the international postal systems of all the countries and hope the postcards and certifications can be delivered to your mailboxes as soon as possible.

Take good care and wish you all the best.

This message was sent by Wikipedia Asian Month International Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, though the Wikipedia:Service awards are not a rigidly enforced set of badges, I thought I might casually mention that you don't exactly meet the criteria for Senior Editor III. The awards require both a certain amount of time and a certain number of edits. I think you'd be more accurately described as Experienced Editor with 7,000 edits over 13 years. Regards, and no disrespect intended. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for submitting this article for WP:WAM. However, there appears to be some close paraphrasing with this link, so the article has been rejected for now. Please address the paraphrasing so that the article can be promoted. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, will you still be able to fix the paraphrasing in this article? Earwigs is still detecting matches with this link, and while I'm not sure which copied from where, this still needs to be resolved if the article is to be accepted. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Oaktree b for improvements to several articles during the fourth year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oaktree b, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 02:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edwardsiella tarda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly Les Cabrils station and Des Cabrils station both exist. Victuallers (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Des Cabrils Station at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 00:50, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oaktree b I noticed you did a fantastic job on Shannon Singh's article and was wondering if you might create one for Liberty Poole? Liberty has now appeared on two television shows Love Island and Dancing on Ice and so now qualifies for one 2A01:4C8:C21:C53:F05D:B522:AEC6:9ABE (talk) 05:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll take a look at it. All depends on what sources are available. I get hits form the Mail and Daily Mirror, which aren't acceptable. Have to see if anything else comes up. Oaktree b (talk) 12:49, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the request above is coming from a globally-locked editor. Please be aware of such requests from similar IPs.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed, I believe the article has merit, found a few reputable sources, the Poole lady has been in a few reality TV shows in the UK for a number of episodes, should meet the notability requirements. The article about the skating show had a red link for it with all other contestants having articles, so there is some need for the article, as well. Oaktree b (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying. I've been at it for hours to try to assist the editor in understanding notability, and I think I'm just going in circles. Oh well. Singularity42 (talk) 20:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I still think biting the newbies can apply in certain situations. It will likely get deleted anyway. Oaktree b (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, how I've been tempted... :) Singularity42 (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has now threatened me for nominating Ethelmary Oakland for deletion. That someone threatens me for nominating an article sourced only to IMDb, which we hold to be unreliable, is very frustrating. Especially when at least one other editor was not able to find any reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report the user, they don't allow threats on here. Oaktree b (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to Broadcast Music Incorporated, the Brad Wolf in this article is not the same guy. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

well there goes my hard work. I'll go update it on the vote discussion page. Oaktree b (talk) 19:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oaktree. I revered your additions to the AfD discussion at the Jason Moore (writer) article here. As it states at the top of the closed discussion, in bold and in red, "Please do not modify it." The AfD is closed and archived, and any continuing discussion should take place on the draft article's talk page. Thank you. --Kbabej (talk) 22:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, noted. thank you Oaktree b (talk) 23:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This is the second time I've noticed a malfunction sig after your AfD !vote. Any idea if you have a template issue going on? Just flagging in case. Star Mississippi 14:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I'm not sure to be honest. Wiki code is not one of my strong points, I think there I forgot to include the 4 ~ things after my vote. I'll keep an eye on it, thanks for the heads up. Oaktree b (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. And me neither on the coding. Have a great day Star Mississippi 14:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emperor Ferdinand Northern Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Bain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I've seen you around a whole bunch on AfD talking about articles that are just lists of financial transactions and stuff (like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Ventures). I'm trying to clarify the policy on them a little, since there's definitely a small community of folks who are insistent that raising VC rounds establishes notability, and wondering if you might know how to go about it. I started a discussion here to try and clarify WP:NCORP here Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Analyst_reports_in_WP:LISTED but it's got very little discussion so far and might not be enough. Thoughts? FalconK (talk) 02:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure your equally confused as me. My theory is that some article about a flood got nominated 4 deletion but the link to that deletion discussion got "lost in a flood"(I'll stop the dumb jokes)and the link to the flood deletion discussion goes to the yahwism deletion discussion. May ask permission to remove your question from the deletion debate so that debate stays on Yahwism. MAY I also ask to know the flood article title so I can help clear things up Greenhighwayconstruction (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I appreciate bad jokes! The flood article was "Bridgeton flood of 1934". No problem with moving things around as needed. Oaktree b (talk) 01:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator of this AfD has been blocked as a sock, and you are the only other user who supported deletion, on the basis that there were only passing mentions in two sources. About a dozen more news articles written specifically about the subject have been found since then, so if you would be willing to reconsider your vote, I think it would help to expedite closing the issue. Thanks! 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oaktree b! As you participated in Zibby Owens AFD discussion I wonder if you could evaluate the article itself too. Jjanhone (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Archeological playing card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oaktree b, thank you for your comment at Loofball adD! I have made some improvements to the article loofball, including adding another source (https://thenationonlineng.net/loofball-emerging-sport-shaping-young-lives-in-nigeria/). Please review and reassess. Thank you once again. Joesmithroots (talk) 07:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Oaktree b,

I just wanted to thank you for your active participation in deletion discussions. I don't always see things the same way that you see them but as a discussion closer, it's not about my opinion but about the consensus and evidence presented by the discussion participants. I see you there frequently and I know it can be time-consuming giving articles a thorough evaluation and tracking down sources so I wanted to thank you for that. And I hope if you have issues with either a comment of mine or a closure, you'll come talk it out on my User talk page. See you around! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comment! It's been interesting. I'll let you know if I do have issues, I generally don't, we all work together. Oaktree b (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also just wanted to say thanks for your consistently civil and well-thought-out participation. Ovinus (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I'm trying to help where I can. I do appreciate the recognition. Oaktree b (talk) 23:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oak.. thanks for your insights; I am sort of learning my way around... PS how do you get, or earn, one of those nifty looking Barnstars? Flibbertigibbets (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh the barnstars? Some editors will give them out to others as a thank you or as an award. The 10 and 15 yr ones I just posted myself. I don't remember exactly where, on here. Welcome to wiki. Oaktree b (talk) 01:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"thanks made my day".. I just did an afd proposal; and traced the article back to this editor.

User talk:ArcangelLaMarivilla

What is your impression? (looks like many articles proved transitory).. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 01:37, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some users don't quite understand what "notability" means for wikipedia. I don't necessarily fault them; I've been doing wiki article for almost 20 years. It takes a while to understand the various bits and bots here and how to properly source things. I think that's the case with this user; some are just very excited to create articles without getting all the parts correct. It's important to stick with it, that's really the only way to improve. Oaktree b (talk) 01:45, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I hit the learning curve at high speed, or the curve hit me in the face; I am not sure. Notability is tricky.. I am trying to learn about it at the moment. I have been keeping a "learning log" on my talk page.. I am trying not to cause too much chaos or overhead for others. anyway its good to be meeting folks and working with them.. Wikipedia was a good supplement today to kayaking. Flibbertigibbets (talk) 01:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good resource, I consult it often; a chart showing what is a "reliable source" here and what isn't. [2]. In a nutshell, try to get hits on what whatever topic you're writing an article about from the "green sources" and none from the "red sources". Otherwise, peer-reviewed scientific journals are the top level source (like what you'd find in Google Scholar), then books, then magazines and newspapers. Oaktree b (talk) 02:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	Wikipedia Asian Month 2022 contest
	Oaktree b Thank you for your additions in Wikipedia Asian Month2022.8 of your articles have been accepted. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Oaktree b! Just wanted to followup on this edit without derailing the AfD. Not that I'm not occasionally frustrated by policies, but what in particular? Valereee (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You said that you didn't see a lot of sources for the feud, so I added a lot, maybe too much, sources for their relationship and what they have said to each other. Thanks, Matthew. MasterMatt12 (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the article. Please let me know if still have objections and possibly I can resolve them. 86.82.98.200 (talk) 10:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to reply on the AfD page, but that would've been off-topic. The gist of it is: an underscore acts the same way as a space in wikilinks. For instance, Morbius_(film) is the same thing as Morbius (film) to the software. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 04:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhh that makes sense. Seemed odd to me, thanks for the explanation. Oaktree b (talk) 04:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being a good, honest and fair editor ✠ Emperor of Byzantium ✠ (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Oaktree b (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oaktree b. I wanted to let you know that I have removed the Template:Lead missing that you added in this edit as there was already a lead section. Did you mean to add a different template listed at Template:Introduction cleanup maintenance templates? --Super Goku V (talk) 19:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think I clicked on the wrong one using the twinkle thing. That's ok. Oaktree b (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, gotcha. Given that the lead for Ridge Alkonis is now smaller than before, should it be tagged with Template:Lead too short or is it fine as is? (Also, sorry for not mentioning the article name. That was intended to go in the section name.) --Super Goku V (talk) 19:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No that looks fine, usually just a short sentence to introduce the article and give a quick summary is good for a lead. No worries, I've been doing wiki for almost 20 yrs (wow!) and I still make mistakes when updating stuff here. Thanks for mentioning it! Oaktree b (talk) 21:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha and sorry if I caused any trouble. --Super Goku V (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you cited a notable World Records Rule earlier here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Douglas_and_Mary_Beth_Meyer I have not been able to find any information on this. Can you please link me to the rule? I think it would be helpful.

Thanks.KatoKungLee (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources Scroll down to " G" Oaktree b (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you check the list, it was given the symbol for no consensus.KatoKungLee (talk) 18:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct, it's an iffy source. Having one doesn't make you notable. Oaktree b (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no consensus.KatoKungLee (talk) 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KatoKungLee, that's not a good sign. Drmies (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no consensus.KatoKungLee (talk) 18:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I heard you the first time. I'm not sure you heard us. Drmies (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, it is what it is. I'm not seeing notability, we'll let the process play out. Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I hope you are doing well. I often come across your participation in AfDs. I have always found your arguments well thought, and well worded. I just have a nagging suggestion. Sometimes, you break the indent/dont follow standard MOS while commenting. When you are !voting, no matter what is above, the !vote should be bulleted (with *'''keep/delete/merge/redirect'''), other than that everything is good :-) —usernamekiran (talk) 02:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do that sometimes, my thoughts get disorganized. I'll post my reasoning for !delete, then realize I haven't actually put in the DELETE part yet. No worries. I'll try to stick to convention. Oaktree b (talk) 02:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I saw you opened Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Michael. The user Christopheronthemove looks really suspicious after I found Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jehowahyereh/Archive. I think the evidence provided there were pretty clear to prove Christopheronthemove have been using multiple accounts. Even the closing admin commented as It's certainly possible that there's some socking/meatpuppetry/UPE going on here. Unfortunately the filer of that case also got blocked and no action were taken only because of that. This user's sudden jump into AFD discussions immediately after creating the ID looks so suspicious to me. They are continuously creating promotional articles. Look at Vriddhi Vishal. I think someone experienced like you should watch over this user's edits. Thank you. 111.92.78.199 (talk) 18:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it. Thanks for the update. Oaktree b (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding replies to a blocked user. It's pointless and unnecessary. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I wasn't aware he had been blocked. My bad. Oaktree b (talk) 19:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to self-revert? I really don't enjoy edit-warring with you over something like this.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just do what you have to, I won't bother with it. To be fair I thought the blocked user was removing my comments. No tis fine, no issues with you removing them. Oaktree b (talk) 19:51, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An admin once said about articles that shouldn't be on Wikipedia that it's "a sad feature of Wikipedia that it will continue to have a lot of substandard content." The "substandard content" gets added everyday.

You have a knack for finding every manner of article that has no reason to be on the project and nominating it on AfD. My opinion is not the popular one but it is my perspective you're doing a great service and adeptly navigating a difficult area where, in my observation, the most canvassing and spurious arguing happens on the website. Saucysalsa30 (talk) 21:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you, I wonder sometimes if it's helping anyone. Glad to hear it. Oaktree b (talk) 22:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I would like to thank you for your help on my AfDs. You regularly contribute to the discussion of my nominations in the last few days. Unfortunately, I feel my work wasn't recognized at all, to the contrary, it was even being blamed for implicit misogyny and discrimination by a user. Since I am still quite new and I wasn't expected such unfair comments, I won't continue in that aspect of work anymore. Is it possible to inform you about some additional articles that I intended to nominate for deletion in order for you to check and start this process? The articles are: CAP-e, Neembuu Uploader and GigaPix. Thank you, Chiserc (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at those. Thank you for your kind comment. Oaktree b (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional because it provides a factual overview of the notable achievements and contributions of Amro Mustafa (formerly known as Zack TM), an Egyptian entrepreneur. The article highlights his educational background, career trajectory, and involvement in various ventures, including software solution companies and investments in well-known organizations. While it mentions specific companies, the focus is on Mustafa's professional journey and entrepreneurial endeavors, rather than solely promoting those companies. The content adheres to the guidelines of providing an objective and informative perspective on the subject. --Zacktm3 (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to meet standard notability requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google's full of related news, Anyways..I'm updating the references with multiple news articles mentioning the person from known websites, Hopefully this fixes the issue. Zacktm3 (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears promotional for a non-notable individual. If it's not, they will keep it. Oaktree b (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mind explaining how this is vandalism? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They put it in mainspace instead of their talk page. Oaktree b (talk) 02:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's on their user page? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry! I just saw that now. My bad. Oaktree b (talk) 02:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was wrong. Fixed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:06, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no worries. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oaktree b,

I just wanted to thank you for your continued, thoughtful participation in AFD deletion discussions. We have a lot fewer "regulars" in AFD land than we did a year or so ago and even fewer who are not a predictable "Delete" or "Keep" in every discussion they participate in. I take your opinion seriously, especially on relisted discussions, because I know you actually investigate and evaluate an article, its sources and even look for previously undiscovered sources that can be used to improve an article. I think right now we have too many newish editors participating in AFDs who see it as a vote and not as an opportunity to possibly improve a mediocre article to become a better one.

We seem to have lost a lot of participating editors during last year's battles over athletes' biographies and if you know of any editors who were once active in AFDs and "retired" and who offered useful opinions in discussion, please give them a nudge and encourage them to return even on a occasional basis. Thanks again for all of your contributions to the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for the kind words. I'm trying to do what I can in AfD. I've often wondered if it matters what I do, or if I'm too harsh at times, but I hope it makes some small difference. Oaktree b (talk) 00:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you are too harsh. There are a few regular participants at AFDs who make snide comments, about the article, the article subject or other participants. But I haven't seen that coming from you, I don't think I've seen you commenting on other editors at all and you stick to points about sources and policy. It's appreciated! I wish I could clone you! That doesn't mean I always agree with you and your position, I just know you have put some thought and effort into it and it isn't a knee-jerk "Delete per nom" or "Meets GNG" which I wish I could just strike out like comments by sockpuppets. But that's not how remarks like those are handled in deletion discussions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say this! Thanks for your efforts. Chamaemelum (talk) 07:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I nominated the article after some Iranian "fan" removed your tag! Ireland nat (talk) 00:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll keep an eye on it. Oaktree b (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okoslavia (talk) 04:09, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. First of all, I want to thank you for your relentless efforts to the Wikipedia community.I strongly commend you and draw a lot of inspiration from your works. However, I'll really love to understand why you marked an article I created "Judikay" for deletion. She has over 5 awards/nominations which are all referenced, a lot of media coverage from reliable sources, notable works (song) and international recognition. Perhaps, there's something missing on my own end. I'm just really curious as to why the article was flagged for deletion. I'll really appreciate your response. Once again, thanks for all you do. Cheers! Mevoelo (talk) 21:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oaktree b,

Just letting you know I've removed the Notability tag from that page. Sources seem to confirm that short film is notable. Yours, -MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) 10:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohamednainar54 and Marxist Economist are continuously making edits without providing any sources to support his actions. I warned them twice at MN54 talk page and ME talk page but they still keep doing so. Have a look at Marxist's contributions and at Mnainar54's contributions. Please help. Shaan Sengupta (talk) 11:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oaktree b. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of الشيخ مرتضى أبوبكر غاتا, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: No link to foreign Wikimedia project has been provided. I'll move this to the draftspace. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's in a non-English language. Ok, draft seems fine I suppose. 99.226.79.29 (talk) 21:33, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - I was in the process of deleting Anthony Vaz (American investor) as complete garbage at the same time you were nominating at AFD. I left a note there. I'd prefer to let the CSD stand and close the AFD early, but can undelete if you're seeing something I may be missing in the sourcing. Sam Kuru (talk) 13:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's fine. I'll ask to close the AfD. Oaktree b (talk) 13:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thank you for your feedback on the new article and your willingness to help newer users. I understood that the cited Chicago Tribune article, Windy City Times article, and Canadian Deaf news, all of which are independent and significant coverage, would be enough? Oddrobb (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're a prolific AfD nominator across a wide range of topics -- do you have a method for how you look for articles to nominate (for instance, perusing a maintenance category of articles tagged as problematic)? Or are you more eclectic (I just look at the list of AfDs and pick ones I find interesting).

Anyway, what you do is important even if we frequently disagree. Thanks for doing this!

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 20:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it's usually a quick scan of the new page patrol list and I can tell from the flowery language which ones are needing AfD. I'm going for the low hanging fruit now (the ones you can tell are puffery), anything Nigeria, India, crypto or entrepreneur are likely candidates. Otherwise, just ones that sound like BS, lol. You get the hang of it quick enough; I'd apply to be a new page patroller but I do other projects off-line, so this is just ad-hoc for now. Oaktree b (talk) 20:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Thanks, A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 20:59, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oaktree b,

I hope you know that I value all of your contributions but especially your consistent participation in AFD deletion discussions. I always value your evaluation of articles even when they don't end up in line with the consensus of the group. However, I just closed several AFD discussions you started as Keeps and the commonality is that you nominated all of these articles within an hour or a few hours after they were created in main space.

There is no official "grace period" that we extend to editors creating new articles before they can be tagged for deletion but I would advise against nominating an article that has just been created and is actively being edited and improved. What can happen is over the next 7 days, the article is improved so much that it doesn't resemble the original article you tagged for a deletion discussion. On the other hand, I think we have lots of poor articles from the "old days" that could use clearing out. I know they can be tougher to track down but you might take a subject you know well and just go through a category, looking at older articles that don't meet the standards we have in 2023. I think of an editor a year or so ago who went through a software category and PROD'd dozens of articles of software that were created 15 years ago and then the software wasn't supported or the company was shut down or the programs just disappeared. Just dated articles that made no sense a decade later. Any way, it's just a suggestion.

Thanks again for all you do and I hope you are having a cool and restful weekend. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oaktree b. The new pages patrol team is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help. I believe that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting. Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines. Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions. If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here. Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oaktree b. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Steps such as checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline are mandatory and will take a few minutes per article.
• Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any required steps.
• Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oaktree b. I see you are pumping out barnstars. It would be a good idea to say what article you are talking about when awarding a barnstar. Perhaps it was in respect Selenite sulfate the first review you did. Anyway I wish you an effective review career here! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:07, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was, I thought it would attach it to the article. Thanks for the info. Trying to spread the wikiove. Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:William Kilbourn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm replying here as the AfD has already too many sidetracks. I'm a bit puzzled about your request. Generally speaking linking a RS is enough to judge its reliability, here I also summarized to the best of my ability the Kol Ha'ir article and enlighted its elements of significance (the commercial success of the album with 6,000 copies sold, the hit songs, the bad reviews commentary, the "established phenomenon in the entertainment industry/market" literal citation), I expected a comment on these contents, but if your reply is "I don't speak Hebrew so don't feel able to judge the quality of the sources" I have no idea how to convince you a given article is a piece of sigcov and that its contents support a claim of notability. For what it's worth, this is the page about the newspaper in hewiki, maybe you can use a translator to get an idea its reliability (the same with the other sources). I am not sure what more I am supposed to do. If you are asking me something like fully translate all the available sources, I anticipate that I am not available to such a crazy task, as I have already spent way too much time on that page. My best, Cavarrone 03:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for providing me guidance related to WP Football and Notability Demt1298 (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oaktree b (talk) Hey, good morning. Wrongly, I prodded the Rajput Mughal marriage alliances page for deletion, then I immediately undid my edit, but after some time, a robot again prodded for deletion. I didn't prod, and I really want to save the article. Please recommend to me the right way to request or get rid of this mistake because my intentions were to request the deletion of only one page of the Jethwa dynasty and nothing else. So if you're familiar with how to save a mistakenly deleted page, please do help. Thank you Transe Ænd Danse (talk) 20:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Oaktree b. I saw your latest comment on Articles for deletion/Fuck the War EP. I know that you didn't mean anything by it but I have a feeling that Annette Bonze Blayk might react negatively to your use of the word "man" when you replied to her. It might be a good idea to go back and change the comment before it unintentionally causes any more drama. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Oaktree b (talk) 23:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I removed the speedy deletion tag from this article. The article is promotional but its got refs and the guy may be notable. I think it’s better off taken to AfD.

Thanks for all you do to keep this place going, especially at deletions! —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 00:31, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We've got a lovely beef pie, though.

Do you want chips with that? 🤡 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fish fingers and custard for me, thanks. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:29, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why you place your AfD !votes often higher on the page, even at the very beginning, instead of in chronological order? Your indentation is also different to the standard used on those pages. Fram (talk) 14:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll usually reply to the main deletion discussion, so it doesn't get indented further down the page, I would assume responding to the main article is the correct way to reply, not to the last comment in the forum. Oaktree b (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "Reply" function isn't great at correctly placing things other than for simple discussions. The "Edit" function is probably better to use. Or using a tool like Awesome Aasim's xfdvote. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, in an AfD a comment is supposed to be placed at the bottom, not where some tool may place it (of course a reply to another "keep" or "delete" should be placed below that one, as in any discussion, but a new "keep", "delete", "merge" should always be placed as the last comment, not near the top or somewhere in the middle). Fram (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That tool looks nifty, I'll give it a try. Oaktree b (talk) 14:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, I spotted that you moved one of the pages I created to draft. I thought sources were pretty good and I have spotted other articles on wiki being much shorted and with barely any sources. Can I ask you what made this one go back to draft? How can I improve it and how many sources do I need? Thank you Musicalge3k5 (talk) 22:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We're looking for more extensive sourcing, articles about her for example. Most of what's given are name drops. She won the theatre award as shown in the article, there should be articles about that. I think if we had one or two big articles about her for sourcing, the article would be good. She is notable, but I didn't think the sources used were just quite enough. Hope that explains it. Oaktree b (talk) 00:04, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fenton Communications (2nd nomination). I posted a couple of links to articles at newspaperarchive.com. Can you verify whether you can click through and see the articles? Thanks! — Jacona (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I responded in the AFd instead of here, but yes I can see them. I have to login using the Wikipedia Library, but the links work! Oaktree b (talk) 14:08, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It is good to know. With all the effort it takes, I didn't want to do it if others couldn't see it! I guess I'll start posting wikipedia library access required along with the links in the future. — Jacona (talk) 14:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I saw you leave Delete in this deletion discussion, and I think it is right for this document to be listed, so I am seeking your help. (This is not an objection to your opinion in the deletion discussion, so I'll leave it on your page.) I thought this article had enough sources, but I'm going to revise this article so it can be a Keep for others too. Do I need to add more reliable sources? 올해의수상자 (talk) 04:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the stub singleton field into a different stub that maybe situates the topic in context better. What do you think? XOR'easter (talk) 18:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, really needs expansion beyond what it is now, but it's a good start. Oaktree b (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you participated in the Wikipedia Asian Month 2022 as an organizer or editor.

Dear all,

The Wikipedia Asian Month 2023[1] is coming ! The campaign start within a flexible 30 days from November to December. Following with the changes of the rules made by last year, the wish to have more people get to know Asia and Asian related topic is the same! Click "Here" to Organize/Join a WAM Event.

1. Propose "Focus Theme" related to Asia !

If you are based somewhere in Asia, or have specific passion on an Asian topic, please propose your "Focus Theme" by October 25th. The WAM international team will select 5 themes. Please propose your focus theme through this link[2].

2. Enhancing existing articles can also count as part of campaign contribution.

Any edits, including creating new articles or adding new content to existing articles, over 3000 bytes in total would be able to get a reward. Last year, due to this change of rules, the Programs & Events Dashboard was suggested. However, according to community survey of 2022, Fountain Tool is still the best platform for tracking edit and points. You don’t need to create any Dashboard. For the tracking of editing existing article, the international team is currently designing a form. Will soon publish to the main page of WAM 2023.

3. More flexible campaign time

The contribution duration would remain 30days, but we extended the overall campaign timeline to 2 months. All organizers can decide when to start their WAM as long as the whole duration is within November 1st to December 31th. It means that you can participate in WAM based on the needs of your local community.

Timetable

• October 1st, 2023 : Publish International Campaign Page of the Year
• October 5th to 25th, 2023 : Call for focus themes of WAM 2023.
• Before 29 October, 2023: Complete Registration [3] of Each language Wikipedia.
• November 1st, UTC 00:00 to December 31th, UTC 00:00, 2023: Running the Campaign. (Find your local campaign for the actual event date.)
• January 1st to March 15th, 2024: Auditing of each language Wikipedia.
• March 30th, 2024: Deadline of reporting statistics and eligible editors to the International Team
• April 1st to May 15th, 2024: The international team distributes Barnstars and Certificates to eligible editors of each event.

For your information, the main page of Wikipedia Asian Month is currently undertaking a reconstruction for archiving purpose. For the 2023 event please bookmarked this page. We hope you will enjoy Wikipedia Asian Month! If you have any inquiry, feel free to contact us by info@asianmonth.wiki [4]. We look forward to your participation.

Cheers!!!

WAM 2023 International Team

[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Asian_Month_2023

[2] https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfPLz8kvSP_0LlI4vGRHAP2ydJPnLY__1hb9-p8AsRcS2R2NQ/viewform?usp=sf_link

[3] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Asian_Month_2023/Join_an_Event

[4] info@asianmonth.wiki

Hi, at the Jimi Cravity afd I read that you thought the sources I gave were unreliable. I have to disagree as the three christian music sites are listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian music/Sources and AllMusic is regarded as reliable by most music editors hence its inclusion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. Also. it no longer seems to have an entry at the perennial sources list, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oaktree b,

I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We chose to reach out to you because you have been highly active on various discussion pages.

The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.

If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.

If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.

Thank you for your consideration.

--- Jonathan at CornellNLP (talk) 17:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'll try it out! Oaktree b (talk) 19:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Đại Việt quốc (talk) 00:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Keep, so please go ahead to add in your sources. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	Wikipedia Asian Month 2023 contest
	Oaktree b Thank you for your additions in Wikipedia Asian Month 2023.5 of your articles have been accepted. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 09:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like you mentioned, at Manish Doshi's 2nd Afd nomination, the use of news coverage about a medical device not make it notable person, even though it's certified by the FDA. FDA certification is necessary to sell medical items in the USA, but it doesn't automatically make something or someone notable. This same idea was used in the nomination of Concept Medical. I am really doubtful how news and coverage about a medical devicee can make the company manufacturing it notable. Even though the AfD discussion is closed and I don't plan to nominate it again, mam curious to know if my nomination was incorrect. If it was, how should someone evaluate such articles? Charlie (talk) 11:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD for the the subject article was closed as merge on October 10. Since you started the discussion, I wanted to remind you about it because it has not yet been merged. I realize there is no hard requirement for an AfD starter to complete resulting merge work, but I hope you will consider doing it. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 02:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you have some spare time, could you participate in the AFD for Civil Police Officer? It is not getting enough participation. Thank you in advance. 2409:4073:114:4E4C:4D26:ABA5:4290:7758 (talk) 15:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Flying Fish of Fashionability
	Noticed your 20 year status and wanted to congratulate you for chuggin' along! Also, I noticed the Canada 10,000 project in your template bio and am intrigued, so thanks for hooking me on that. Cheers! UnexpectedSmoreInquisition aka USI (talk) 07:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pham Ngoc Thao CIA file.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:25, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you previously participated in a deletion debate for this article which was deleted due to not enough RS. I have found some more sources for this article and would appreciate it if you could contribute to the follow up discussion at User talk:Sionk#James Mason (wrestler). Thank you. Romomusicfan (talk) 08:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Clarence Birdseye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote at this afd was tampered with. I have restored your original vote. Hope you don't mind that. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 05:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no, that's ok. Thank you for the heads up Oaktree b (talk) 16:19, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	For consistency and diligence in working through large volumes of articles at WP:AFD. As someone who does a pretty fair amount of nominating, you show up to check with remarkable consistency. BrigadierG (talk) 13:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it! Oaktree b (talk) 15:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... How are you doing? Jutos222 (talk) 21:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine thank you. Oaktree b (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Just saw your contribution to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Burrows (producer) (2nd nomination), which says how much work you put into it. And I often see you be the third or fourth opinion in low participation AFDs. That's a lot of value added where it's sorely needed. Thank you! Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. Oaktree b (talk) 04:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd ask that you resurrect John Paczkowski's page, as continues to be a very well known andrespected journalist. His reporters have won pretty much every award in the business (Livingston, Polk, Pulitzer, Mirror, SABEW). And he's completely resurrected Forbes tech reporting, which has led the industry on TikTok reporting: https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilybaker-white/2022/11/28/tiktoks-china-problem/?sh=550c549c1ee4

Before moving to editing, he interviewed Apple CEO Tim Cook and broke all manner of news about Apple and other big tech companies.

Forbes announcement: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbespr/2022/05/26/forbes-names-john-paczkowski-executive-editor-of-innovation-and-technology/?sh=218988244539

Twitter scoop: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnpaczkowski/2023/11/19/linda-yaccarino-x-twitter-elon-musk-antisemitism-urged-to-resign/?sh=1f24a0e13929

Day of announcement Vision Pro review: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnpaczkowski/2023/06/07/this-is-what-its-like-to-use-apples-new-vision-pro-mixed-reality-headset/

Buzzfeed News Archive: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/author/johnpaczkowski

Kara Swisher announcing Paczkowki's column: https://www.vox.com/2014/4/28/11626138/john-paczkowskis-back-with-daily-codered-column-on-recode

Paczkowki's allthingsD archive. He was Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg's first editorial hire: https://allthingsd.com/author/john/index.html

Tim Cook interview: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/johnpaczkowski/twenty-minutes-with-tim-cook

AirPods scoop: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/johnpaczkowski/inside-iphone-7-why-apple-killed-the-headphone-jack# AliceTheGoon (talk) 17:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have the ability to do so, you can ask on the Teahouse here for help on how to do that. But most of these sources still don't look notable enough to build an article. Oaktree b (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you remove the added template since the relevance Noam Bettan was demonstrated and I was adding more independent and reliable references about the French Israeli artist The user has not yet responded to the different calls but the relevance is demonstrated Acartonadooopo (talk) 02:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this person should have a wikipedia article, the notability is not demonstrated. I've nominated it for deletion. Oaktree b (talk) 03:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on giving it more notoriety, I should recognize that the artist does have an established career, of course he is still emerging but that does not diminish his importance.--Acartonadooopo (talk) 14:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, because no one has yet issued an opinion on the relevance of the article Noam Bettan. I think that if a maintenance template already existed you did not have to open this query I am waiting for a response And the relevance and notoriety is more than proven.Acartonadooopo (talk) 16:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it would get deleted, regardless. Oaktree b (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The great notoriety of this article is currently being debated Maan Abu Taleb with only 2 sources and no notability other than a sold book. Acartonadooopo (talk) 14:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Resilient Barnstar
	I am warding you this Barnster for your resilience and dorsile will in AFDs. Thanks for helping out in nominating and adding votes when necessary. 👏👏👏 Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Much appreciated. Oaktree b (talk) 22:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]