Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Topless Day (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 13:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go Topless Day

Go Topless Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is exclusively told from an American POV. The first sentence of the article directly states that it "is an annual event held in the United States to support the right of women to go topless in public on gender-equality grounds." All of the info on this page has been directly lifted from Female toplessness in the United States#Political_movements which is the more appropriate place for this information to be presented. As this page is an exact copy it does not warrant an entire page to itself. I suggest deletion. Agent123456789 (talk) 18:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• keep, An annual event held in the United States will be sourced with American references. Nothing strange about that. Christian75 (talk) 07:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  It appears to have been deleted already. Red-linked. Oaktree b (talk) 17:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Sexuality and gender, Canada, and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I see plenty of coverage from a variety of news sources, spanning a decade, so I'm not seeing a notability problem. Moreover, I would like to note that Canada is not, in fact, part of the United States, and the CBC, Toronto Star, Toronto Sun, and National Post are Canadian news outlets, not American ones. -- asilvering (talk) 01:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per asilvering; content which touches on Canadian aspects does not belong in an article about the United States. The assertion by the nominator that this article is an exact copy is therefore either incorrect or can be fixed by normal editing processes. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  23:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- the sources already in the article are much, much more than are necessary to meet the GNG. Perhaps Nom is correct that the info would be better placed in another article, but this can be handled by merge or redirect and is therefore a matter for ordinary editing. Central and Adams (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.