Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ateny Wek Ateny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep, especially after article improvements. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ateny Wek Ateny

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing sufficient notability here. No none-routine coverage while he held the press secretary position (not an inherently notable office in itself); all coverage is about him being sacked, for which we get 4x the same press release, one hit piece, and an interview denying said hit piece. Nice gossip but encyclopedic it ain't. (Previously deleted by PROD two years ago, at which point coverage would have been essentially zero) -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete press secretary isn't notable, the rest is gossipy spam stuff. Oaktree b (talk) 23:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - strictly speaking there have been several national press articles which have profiled the subject and in my opinion meet the GNG. That said, there are things in the article that need immediate attention which I'm going to tidy now. JMWt (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the non-trivial coverage. Bruxton (talk) 15:48, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. His Press Secretary career made the news, so did his appointment and his dismissal, there is multiple significant coverage. I added it in. CT55555(talk) 21:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Based on what I can see in the sources, coverage here is non-trivial and the subject satisfies WP:GNG. Shawn Teller (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.