User talk:Jmanlucas

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anderson Varejão has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anderson Varejão was changed by Jmanlucas (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951481 on 2015-11-05T22:27:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nauro Machado for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 02:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kōji Naka for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Musa^Talk ☻ 03:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Claudio Pieri.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Claudio Pieri.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for translating thearticle on Rino Serri. Pleasedo more such articles--and it might help if I gave you some advice for the best way to do such translations: 1. Be sure to make a link to the original wiki on the talk page of the translated article, and also to add the linkage to the list of Languages in the left hand column. 2. Do not rely on Google translate to get the grammar right. it is especially poor with getting the English tenses in the correct idiomatic form. In particular, in translating from Italian, (and Spanish , and Portuguese) remember that we do not normally use the present tense in describing historical events in the past,. 3. Do not rely on Google translate to get yhe names of organizations and other institutions and people in the correct enWP form. The best way to find them is to look for the original language WP article on the subject, and see what is the equivalent English article. That way, the English article can have links to the proper English WP articles. I did most of this for you in the opresent article DGG ( talk ) 01:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Adonis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Gibson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your valuable contributions : DreamSparrow Chat 10:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Anne-Marie Minvielle.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Anne-Marie Minvielle. Note that editors have called attention to some urgent issues with the article's quality. If these issues are not resolved, other editors could call for the article to be deleted. For pointers, follow the links in the notices at the top of the page.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating André Pinçon.

User:Lefcentreright while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article. Please just add categories and more references. Otherwise no other problems.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ekaterina Durova for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Snickers2686 (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my note above from 2018. When you translate from another Wikipedia , you must indicate this on the English article, preferably both as a note at the bottom of the article andin the edit summary. This is an absolute requirement of our copyvio policy on WP:Copying within wikipedia Please go now, right now, and do this on all relevant contributions. DGG ( talk ) 20:24, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If he was born in 1962, that would make him six when he started, if his years active in the infobox is correct (1968-2020). It seems rather young to start a singing career, especially considering that the albums listed only go back to 1983. Editrite! (talk) 21:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alana Filippi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jerod Lycett (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alana Filippi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An obit does not show significance nor notability. No other sources exist beyond the two obits that I could find.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jerod Lycett (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alana Filippi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alana Filippi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jerod Lycett (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles are welcome! Hope you're well!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bernard Grosfilley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Postcard Cathy (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Mercier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Mercier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:02, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Arnaud Marquesuzaa.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You have to improve your sources and add more cites (keep in mind, every fact needs at least one source to make to article verifiable) and your article is way too short. Looked up his life, as a world-class rugby player, sure that there's a lot to write about him. Add oil! Happy editing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

WikiAviator (talk) 01:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating this article. WikiAviator (talk) 03:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Jacques Lesourne.

User:WikiAviator, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Overall OK but expansion could be done.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|WikiAviator}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

WikiAviator (talk) 03:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmanlucas, I have updated Jean Leber and changed the birth year from 1949 to 1939 based on the ref/cit. Can you confirm on 1939 because the French wikipedia still uses 1949. Also, where did he die? A city in France? Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 02:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you, SWP13 for bringing this to my attention. It appears as though French Wikipedia incorrectly cited the birth year as 1949, but according to France Musique and the book D’un coup d’archet… Entretiens avec Jean Leber, he was born in 1939. Because Wikipedia is based entirely off of other sources, I would trust the France Musique article and the book over French Wikipedia. However, I was unable to find a place of birth or death after some research into the interviews of the book or after a Google search. Thank you for your edits and for improving the Jean Leber article. -Jmanlucas (talk) 03:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobio Besse Henri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobio Besse Henri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ².O.^Boxing 20:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas. Thanks for creating Marguerite Derrida. However, There already exist the article Marguerite Aucouturier. So, You can consider merging of new article into old one. Thanks. --Gazal world (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gazal world. Thank you for pointing that out. I have merged the necessary information into the Aucouturier article, yet the Derrida one still stands. Any suggestion on how I can delete such an article. Thank you again. Jmanlucas (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No need to delete it. Just redirect it to Aucouturier. --Gazal world (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Werner Lorenz (ice hockey).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 07:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Jacques Razafindranazy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Jacques Razafindranazy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sérgio Trindade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sérgio Trindade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Melcous (talk) 14:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello You have translated the article Victor Batista Falla from its French equivalent. So could you indicate it in the article in English? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Translated_page

Thank you in advance MissTick242 (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

When you’re translating articles from the French Wikipedia, you’re legally required to give attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Regards. --Thibaut (talk) 05:44, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Please remember to add {{reflist}} in the "References" section: I've added it in several stubs you've recently created, while stub-sorting.

You could also enhance these articles by using {{L}} - you can add the "DEFAULTSORT" and the birth and death categories in just one line of typing, such as {{subst:L|1959|2020|Kassey, Moussa Seybou}}. (If the person is still alive, leaving the death date empty creates the Category:Living people).

Thanks, PamD 07:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmanlucas, can you create an article about Canadian artist and sculptor Gilles Mihalcean. I don't have an account.

Since the 1970s, Gilles Mihalcean is a prominent figure in the sculpture scene of Québec. His work has been shown in several art centres, galleries and museums in Montréal, Canada, the United States and Europe. Throughout his career he has received numerous awards and prestigious grants, including the Victor Martyn Lynch-Staunton (1987), the Jean-Paul Riopelle (2005) and the Prix Paul-Émile-Borduas (2011).

Some of his gallery works can be found here Pavillon Adrien-Pouliot and commons.wikimedia

Here are some sources about him:

• https://artpublicmontreal.ca/en/artiste/mihalcean-gilles/
• http://www.prixduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/recherche/desclaureat.php?noLaureat=433 (includes birth date
• https://www.latribune.ca/arts/gilles-mihalcean-ecouter-ce-que-lon-voit-053c92020e0b8affedb2f7b588f26c3b
• https://collections.mnbaq.org/fr/artiste/600004551
• http://larochejoncas.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Gilles-Mihalcean-CV-2018.pdf (Includes Education and art collections in French
• https://www.concordia.ca/offices/archives/honorary-degree-recipients/2019/June/gilles-mihalcean.html
• https://www.enoac.ca/fr/user/346/public (his awards

Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.15.103.233 (talk) 19:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, 5.15.103.233. I would be glad to to write that article. Give me a few days, as I have some work to do, and then I will be right on it. Jmanlucas (talk) 23:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dalila Ennadre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://fataldeaths.com/2020/Dalila-Ennadre. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ToeFungii (talk) 07:17, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, ToeFungii, I believe you have the order of direct copying wrong. I wrote the Dalila Ennadre article yesterday in my own words based off of a translation from the French Wikipedia article. I was unaware of this fataldeaths.com website until today, and it seems to be copied directly from the article I wrote. Perhaps we should look at the website’s history and see if they have a pattern of copying from Wikipedia articles, and then see if we can justifiably make copyright accusations. Jmanlucas (talk) 17:02, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First, I apologize but had no way of knowing which was the chicken and which was the egg. And they appear to copy a lot of wikipedia articles as I've found/checked 3 different recently deceased and gotten better than 98% match using the copyvio tool earwig. I've looked at the site to try and find some info but it has none that I've been able to see. To the best of my knowledge there's nothing that prevents them from copying WP info so don't think there's anything that can be done. I think I recall that you do a lot of BLP pages so you might want to put in an edit summary when creating the page that it's likely to be copied to stop someone else from tagging your articles. I'm just amazed how fast they can put them out there, but I'm guessing they've got a bot or something that populates the stuff. Thanks for your work. ToeFungii (talk) 04:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Olga Savary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The creeper2007 (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the article is identical to [1]. The text is obviously not older than two days. Could you please explain what is the relation between the texts: ate you the author of both, or was that text copied from our Wikipedia article, or perhaps you have copied it from there to Wikipedia (I hope that the last option is not the case here). Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ymblanter. If you look previously on my discussion page, you can see that fatal deaths also copied an article I had written, Dalila Ennadre. I can assure you that this website has been copying articles that I have written, and not vice versa. As you can see, the layout of this website is the exact same as that of Wikipedia. If there is anything I can do to better protect my articles from plagiarism, let me know. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Jmanlucas (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC) Jmanlucas (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. No, I do not think we can do anything at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tante Gaby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tante Gaby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Michel Roquebert.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add more references (recommended: RS in English) to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 06:50, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Claude Ndam for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:06, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Claire Deluca, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 00:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

You are recipient no. 2424 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guy Beckers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Beckers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  06:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deaths in 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MEP. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Joe Norton (politician). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Joe Norton ), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 09:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC) ]].[reply]

• Same problem with Jean Rosenthal (translator). PamD 11:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Babacar Touré (businessman), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 10:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm surprised that you suddenly think a Facebook page with the title "Jean Martin" is a reliable source. Facebook in general is certainly not reliable, as has been established many times in the past, and there is no way of telling whether the page called "Jean Martin" is an official account or an impersonation account. Therefore, I've reverted the entry to Deaths in 2020 until such time as a properly reliable source becomes available. Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 04:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Ricardo Montserrat.

User:Amkgp, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add more WP:RELIABLE sources as references

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ Amkgp 💬 03:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Simon Gutman, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:25, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for creating the article Paul-Jean Hérault! Just a quick question though, is it a translation of the French version of the page, fr:Paul-Jean Hérault? If it is, could you add a {{translated page}} tag to its talk page, because per WP:TFOLWP, when translating content from another language Wikipedia, this needs to be attributed. If you need any help with that, leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! Seagull123 Φ 21:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Christian Zeimert, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sérgio Trindade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sérgio Trindade (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Carlo Ausino.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add the required missing references. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Amkgp 💬 14:39, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Gordon Brown (sculptor), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Philippe Vigand, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Takao Yaguchi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jaime Daniel Castaño Zacarías, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Louis-Gaston Pelloux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Other than his obits, I can find no in-depth coverage of this person. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yves Laferrière, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, James Bordas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 01:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, László Mindszenti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Moncer Rouissi.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 19:25, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Anatoliy Vishnevskiy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for contributing this article - Vishnevskiy appears to meet WP:NACADEMIC as a member of the Russian Academy. More categories would be helpful!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ThadeusOfNazereth}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 01:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean-Paul Volnay, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yuriy Tuzov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Working actor, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:57, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ernst Schütz, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Élisabeth Burdot.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi thanks for creating the page. One of the most notable things about this journalist is that she won the inaugural prix Bayeux in 1994 - this should be included in the article. Regards

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Goldsztajn (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

—valereee (talk) 12:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Zoran Džorlev, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Alpha Boucher, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 16:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Georg Maier, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dial911 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I see you're quite prolific when it comes to creating new articles. Good work! Please be aware of WP:OVERLINK which says to not link "names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar", for example countries like Canada, Italy, etc. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for "Italian", "French" etc. WP:OVERLINK mentions "nationalities and ethnicities". Robby.is.on (talk) 01:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please do not link "France". Robby.is.on (talk) 23:25, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Robby.is.on, to avoid WP:OVERLINK cases, I have used the names of former existing governments, such as the French Third Republic, and written them as such: France. Would this still be considered an overlink or am I free to format links in this manner? Thanks!Jmanlucas (talk) 03:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would. Linking France that way also isn't very transparent; see WP:EASTEREGG. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're still doing it. Could you please stop? Robby.is.on (talk) 10:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robby.is.on, while I do understand your previous comments and how I must take WP:OVERLINK into regard, I am not quite sure where this is one is coming from. In my judgment, I feel as though most readers would not be familiar with a term such as Kingdom of Italy or French Fourth Republic. Unless an individual was particularly knowledgeable on 20th Century history, the provisions outlined in WP:OVERLINK leave some room for interpretation and an editor's reasoning, as noted in the phrase "try to be conscious of your own demographic biases – what is well known in your age group, line of work, or country may be less known in others". Therefore, I do not feel it is necessary for me to cease linking a page in this manner, as it is quite different than simply linking the countries Italy or France themselves. Only for individuals born after 1946 or 1958, respectively, would I avoid linking Italy or France, as those years established the two republics as we know them today. This is simply my opinion and I would love to hear feedback from you on this issue. However, if we still find ourselves in disagreement, I can assure you such links will be put to a stop. Any personal conviction I have on this issue is not worth any form of dispute and is not that big of a deal. Best, Jmanlucas (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, Jmanlucas. I agree with your reasoning and I want to apologise. I had recently seen lots of links for France after 1958 in articles you created but it turns out that these links were added by an IP editor after you created the articles. I didn't check for that possibility and I regret that. Happy editing and keep up the good work, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Rosetta Barnstar
	You are really doing the Indonesian Wikipedia and Indonesian editors in English Wikipedia a favor by translating articles! You are really helping me in covering notable Indonesian deaths. Thank you! Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 16:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Eddie Kuligowski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra (talk) 07:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you have a draft Request for adminship : Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jmanlucas. Are you planning to take this forward, or do you want to hold back on it? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ritchie333, thanks for reaching out. Initially I left this as a draft as I had planned to come back and sort out some personal goals for myself, but now I believe I’m ready to go forward with this request. Thanks again! Jmanlucas (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Jmanlucas (talk) 13:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Morice Benin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jaume Bassó, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cédric Demangeot, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 (talk) 10:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pepi Merisio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.tumbral.com/tag/Pepi%20Merisio. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Onel5969: (nominator) Jimfbleak (remover), the indicated website (https://www.tumbral.com/tag/Pepi%20Merisio) is a mirror website, so it copies content of Wikipedia, so can the deletion be made undone? SportsOlympic (talk) 14:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Onel5969:. Hello, Onel. Unfortunately, this page was deleted within one hour of the speedy deletion nomination. I do not believe that this post deserved to be deleted by any means. The Instagram post in question was posted two days after the article was originally created. I can assure you that I do not plagiarize or infringe upon copyrights. The article was simply copied and pasted onto an Instagram post, which I had no idea existed until this was brought to my attention. Thanks! Jmanlucas (talk) 14:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Jmanlucas, and SportsOlympic - I have no way of discerning if that is a mirror or not. Regardless, if Jimfbleak takes a look and agrees, I'm sure they'll restore it. I definitely thought it out of character for you, Jmanlucas. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  @Onel5969: No worries! I appreciate your constructive work as an editor and it is certainly important to investigate any instance of potential copyright infringement. Have a good week, Onel. -Jmanlucas (talk) 15:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, when you add people to the Deaths in 2021 page, please note that they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 20:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• My apologies! I've made many edits to Deaths in 2021 so I've known that for awhile, I suppose I just made a careless mistake this time. Thanks for the correction! -Jmanlucas (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder for Deaths in 2022. --Marbe166 (talk) 10:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder for Deaths in 2023. Marbe166 (talk) 20:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christian Zeimert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lone source contains no information about the subject, searching online I was able to find only non-reliable local obituary coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kenjiro Yoshigasaki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenjiro Yoshigasaki. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Claudio Marcatoma Ccahuana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chérif Arbouz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability per WP:NAUTHOR, no significant coverage of the author itself found-able.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Ralph Erskine (cryptologist). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Ralph Erskine), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 19:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Pedro Nel Gil.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs more content to pass WP:BASIC requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cyrille Ndayirukiye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burundian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luca Novac, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Here is a longer biography in English from Liszt Academy, Budapest. Kind regards, --Sir Morosus (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Aleksei Bespalikov.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please do add more sources. Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 20:06, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tava Colo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no automatic notability for supercentenarians. Barring that, does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Vaurie (talk) 10:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Williams Santamaría Valdera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local politician who does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas I have added projects Belgium, Politics, Biography, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. ( To reply click "edit" next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Cheers, --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 04:23, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra (talk) 21:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra (talk) 22:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

scope_creep^Talk 14:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!... I'm very much obligated Kmarius (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jean-Claude Goyon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 22:07, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Yves de Wasseige.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There is a lack of sources through most of the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AmirahBreen}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Amirah talk 17:04, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Robert Desroches, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Alain Richard (monk), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Hamadi Ghawar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:23, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Patrick Verbeke, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean-Claude Goyon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Ludovico Vico.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 21:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Achmad Rizal Zakaria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Deputy mayor is not a notable position

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October songs

Thank you for having started the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Today: memories in friendship --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra (talk) 12:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Michel Robidoux.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please do not use WP as a source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Nightenbelle}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nightenbelle (talk) 14:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Robert Desroches, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 23:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Alain Richard (monk), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 23:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Patricija Šulin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 00:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean-Claude Goyon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 00:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Janusz Bargieł.

User:Celestina007, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Celestina007}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Celestina007 (talk) 20:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Claes Reimerthi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Smart Worachat. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chalard Worachat. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chalard Worachat. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Paul_012 (talk) 21:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Using Google Translate

Sorry for asking bluntly, but does it really not occur to most people that you can't use Google Translate to figure out how a person's name is written in English? At best it will spit out a garbled spelling that's nowhere near the actual name. At worst, as with Chalard Worachat, it messes up the name so badly and outputs a completely different meaning because it has no ability to recognise proper nouns. I've come across quite a few cases of this lately. Is there some page or feature on Wikipedia suggesting that editors do this (use machine translations)? If so, we'll know where the mistake is that needs to be fixed. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, Paul_012. I must admit, and I am quite embarrassed to do so, but this may be my worst blunder in my six years as a Wikipedian. Typically, I check the Wikidata element for any biography that may have an article in English. If not, I double-check to make sure the article meets Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. For an individual whose native language is not written using the Latin alphabet, I can often find the proper spelling in Wikidata. In the case of Chalard Worachat, the English page was not linked to Wikidata, so I had no way of knowing if such an article already existed. Additionally, no spelling was suggested in Wikidata. When I pressed the "translate page" button on Google Chrome, the individual's name was written "Smart Worachat". Still, I wanted to check to make sure that this was the proper translation of his name and Google searched "Smart Worachat", and found this article: https://www.newsdirectory3.com/police-lieutenant-smart-worachat-nicknamed-jormoth-a-famous-political-activist-has-died/. It is now apparent that this was clearly not sufficient in finding a proper Latin-alphabet spelling for Worachat's name, and for that I apologize. I appreciate you letting me know and speaking what you feel; I take this type of constructive criticism thankfully. I hope this explanation helps and I can assure you that I have never been suggested to do this by any Wikipedia page or feature and this error is a fluke amongst the thousands of biographies I have successfully translated on Wikipedia. Best, Jmanlucas (talk) 04:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the detailed response. Please don't worry too much; it happens to us all. I was a bit exasperated in my original post as there seems to be an increasing trend (not only on Wikipedia) of errors like this happening. As Google Translate gets better and people feel more comfortable using it, I'm worried that the collective community may be losing better judgment and forgetting to exercise caution with it. This is compounded by the proliferation of Google-Translated Wikipedia mirrors and junk websites that contain fake Google-Translated articles (like the one you found), and suddenly the web is polluted by nonsensical mistranslations that become so common that people can easily make the mistake of believing them. There's a clear need to raise awareness over the issue, at least among Wikipedia editors, but I'm not quite sure how this could be done. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:30, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I’ve just reviewed a bunch of articles you created. As you may know if material is re-used between different language wikis it needs to be attributed, usually by adding a translation template to the talk page. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 06:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Krystyna Gozdawa-Nocoń.

User:I dream of horses, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Usually, with your number of created articles, I'd nominate for autopatrolled. However, I had to so much work on this one that I decided not to.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 06:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter (talk) 08:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra (talk) 09:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Robert David Steele requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert David Steele (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:03, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Shigemasa Igawa.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs multiple references to meet WP:POLITICIAN for a mayor.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 20:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mccapra (talk) 10:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Abock Busup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmanlucas could you please add Sean Rice to Recent Deaths for January 14 as the page is protected.2A01:4C8:C00:7329:FCF6:EE98:6F7A:DCFC (talk) 04:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• No problem, 2A01:4C8:C00:7329:FCF6:EE98:6F7A:DCFC, it's been posted.

Hi - your article on this topic does not meet the Wikipedia:Notability criteria. Unless you can improve it, including better references and a claim of notability, I will be deleting it later today. Deb (talk) 08:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Silvio Laurenzi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ignacio Cabezón requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://funeralnearme.com/ignacio-cabezon-funeral-death-obituary/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, Onel5969, my first assumption when seeing the speedy deletion headline was that a page I had written had failed to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. However, I was somewhat more surprised to read that the nomination was due to copyright infringement. Reading from the page funeralnearme.com, it appears as though the obituaries posted there are simply copied and pastedd from Wikipedia, not the other way around. Another page I have written, Jaime Serra (politician), falls in the same boat. The page was deleted by Jimfbleak before I was given a chance to respond, although I believe it should be restored given the fact that copyright infringement was not at play here. This has happened to pages I have written on multiple occasions and I think we should compare when the Wikipedia article was written versus when it was copied online; that would solve some of these cases.Jmanlucas (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for ping. The article was created on 6 December 2021, and the obit on 8 December, so you are right, I'll restore, apologies. @Onel5969: for info as the SD nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yvette Thuot, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Viktor Gnezdilov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://funeralnearme.com/viktor-gnezdilov-funeral-death-obituary/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Martin Grüber, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Egon Plümer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dariusz Ciszewski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bernard Dewulf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://muntpunt.bibliotheek.be/en/catalog/bernard-dewulf/waar-de-egel-gaat-gedichten/book/library-marc-vlacc_1513094. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shigemasa Igawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any in-depth coverage of this local politician to satisfy WP:GNG, and small town mayors don't pass WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:47, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Something has gone wrong with the lifespan (dates) at the start of these articles. As you created these articles, I thought it might be worth a look from you. I would have changed them myself, but not sure what needs changing (i.e. on the editing pages). Editrite! (talk) 07:41, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh I see what you mean. For whatever reason, when writing a page on an individual whose native name is Semitic and does not have a specific date, it flips around the birth and death dates. I’m not quite sure how to fix this but when not editing the page, it appears to be fine. Let me know if you have any suggestions. Jmanlucas (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC) Jmanlucas (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you say, the editing pages appear to be correct, but the actual articles aren't. I tried experimenting with an idea, and it almost worked, that is to say it corrected the date order but also included unwanted brackets. What I tried was to put the "lang-ar" immediately after the Arabic instead of before, but was unable to move the short vertical straight line separating (not sure what it's called) and I think that may be the reason it didn't quite work. Editrite! (talk) 05:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure which part of the linked website is considered to be plagiarized? Reading through the website, I could not find a section in which the text in the article matches the text in the link. Perhaps Jimfbleak could take a look but it seems unclear to me. Jmanlucas (talk) 15:38, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this here because we can't have a talk page without an article. I can't now see the copyright violation, which is odd because I checked it and ran Earwig before deleting. I think there are some problems anyway.

I'm not clear what his claim to notability is, there is nothing about awards on anything else. Being a poet and/or a journalist isn't notable in itself, and there is only one reference, his obituary. I don't know if De Standaard is an RS source.

However, looking at the obit, it appears that he may be notable, he's won awards and stuff. In the absence of a clear copyright violation, I'll restore at Draft:Bernard Dewulf for you to expand. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Björn von Finckenstein, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:29, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat (talk) 18:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Karl Homole has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Giorgos Tragas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 15:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nino Filastò, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 16:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you add the death of the Panamanian architect Ariana Lyma Young, who died at the age of 37, to Deaths in 2022, please and thank you. https://www.midiario.com/curiosidades/se-conmueven-las-redes-muere-la-twitera-ariana-lyma-motivadora-quien-lucho-contra-el-cancer-hasta-su-ultimo-suspiro/. 181.197.127.92 (talk) 00:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All taken care of! -- Jmanlucas (talk) 00:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Desroches, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alain Richard (monk), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean-Claude Goyon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jmanlucas: Can you add a couple more references to this dude. He seems to be notable but what is there is not sufficient. scope_creep^Talk 06:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hamadi Ghawar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Ahmed Touili.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references in this article address this person's decease. There is little if any notability in the references about his work as a Tunisian academic. The references do not address the biography of this person.

More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability.

1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
   

Given the mandatory requirements in WP:NBIO (notability of people),, the references in this article do not address the biography of this person. We don't need material about FARK ceremonies. We need references about this Tunisian academic. Kindly attend to the matters above.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Claes Reimerthi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Georges Montillier.

User:TheBirdsShedTears, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article. Please provide additional citations for verification.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TheBirdsShedTears}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lucio Valle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This individual does not appear to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:NBIO).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 03:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shōichi Washizawa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local politician. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Stepan Kupriyanov, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abock Busup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Calvi (author).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Henry Delisle.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating Duncan Henderson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The lead in this article is far too short for this producer's work. Ditto, more references are needed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Silvio Laurenzi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ryszard Frąckiewicz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a non-notable diplomat. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 21:37, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Thank you for creating Anne de Leseleuc.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know if you use machine translations or not when you translate articles from French, but it looks as if you don't really understand French, which results in factually incorrect articles. I recently moved Draft:Jean-Hervé Stiévenart to draft because way too many facts in it were simply wrong, and I now see Chantal Gallia, where you claim that she was a "caricaturist" and "As a caricaturist, Gallia participated...", while in reality she wasn't a caricaturist at all, but an impersonator. Please, either be a lot more careful when translating articles, or don't attempt to translate them, as it is not acceptable to insert falsehoods into our articles. Fram (talk) 12:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yvette Thuot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dariusz Ciszewski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martin Grüber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Egon Plümer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Curbon7 (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Giorgos Tragas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nino Filastò, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dariusz Ciszewski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bernard Dewulf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Andrei Babushkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from www.sysoon.fm/deceased/andrei-babushkin. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:27, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jakez Cornou, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas,

Thank you for creating José García Buitrón.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating, but you should try and expand it and add more reliable and independent sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Idoghor Melody}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:01, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anatoliy Smirnov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 14:09, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Georges Tignard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Lee Yong-hui. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:13, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Stanisław Ciosek. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Vladimir Kulakov (politician, 1936–2022). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mooonswimmer 16:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Camille Ziade. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:57, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stepan Kupriyanov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Charles Nokan. User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This seems to be a translation from the French Wikipedia. When translating articles from another Wikipedia project, please remember to provide attribution as required by WP:CWW. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Spicy}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Spicy (talk) 22:32, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that when creating Adam Zieliński you provided attribution for the translation by placing the {{Translated page}} template on the talk page. Please note that per WP:TFOLWP, attribution must be given in an edit summary on the translated article itself (like I have done here [2]). Placing the {{Translated page}} template on the talk page is optional, but the edit summary (on the article itself, not the talk page) is a requirement. Regards. Bennv123 (talk) 07:25, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Aleksandr Sloboda. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Torben Rechendorff. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:36, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Francis Magny, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean-Jacques Régnier, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 14:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean-Claude Bielitzki, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean-Hervé Stievenart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean-Jacques de Granville, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:19, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Maurice Robert (ethnologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While accomplished, meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ann Stephens (squash) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBAD and would fail WP:NSQUASH if it existed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:19, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bernard Chabbert, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Momo Ayed, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Yuji Nunokawa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean-Hervé Stievenart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Walmor Barbosa Martins, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:25, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Nicola Molè. User:Reading Beans, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating! Could you add more sources?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Reading Beans}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Reading Beans (talk) 05:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Jean Laurent (banker). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Rosetta Barnstar
	For creating/translating many biography articles from other language wikis. Great work. Coldbolt (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Christian Sauvé. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Hopefully you will write more articles! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.[3] In the source there is no Fischlingen. Why did you enter it? Thanks KurtR (talk) 02:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Egon Plümer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Sepp Dürr. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Gulmira Karimova. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Nicole Lattès is a really good article. Well done. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Louis-Charles Bary. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged and hope that you will write more articles! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Nukun Prachuapmo. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Thanks for writing this article. I encourage and hope you will write more! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Kang Seong-mo. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Thanks for writing this article. I encourage and hope you will write more! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Georges Tignard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Vladimir Vlasov (politician), is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jean Pattou, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Serge Christian Guébogo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Alexey Inzhievsky, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Georges Tignard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francis Magny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean-Jacques Régnier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean-Claude Bielitzki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean-Jacques de Granville, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stepan Kupriyanov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Momo Ayed, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anatoly Romanchuk for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nagol0929 (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nagol0929, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Anatoly Romanchuk, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nagol0929}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nagol0929 (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Walmor Barbosa Martins, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean-Jacques de Granville".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yvette Thuot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Walmor Barbosa Martins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Celia Homeford (talk) 11:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jean Pattou, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Serge Christian Guébogo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Gaston Ouassénan Koné. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work! Thanks for creating the article, reviewed!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx (they/them) ⚧ 02:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have nominated Mohammad Esmaili for deletion. You can comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Esmaili. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexey Inzhievsky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Serge Christian Guébogo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Jean Bergougnoux. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:17, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Jeong Si-chae. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Lee Sang-hoon (politician). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Salvatore Distefano. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow • talk 18:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Michel Jager requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. iMahesh (talk) 15:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vladimir Vlasov (politician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Jacques Lucan. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 04:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Jean-Claude Cassini. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 04:22, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. Thank you for your work on Marinette Cueco. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bernard Chabbert".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 02:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In creating an article, Abdullah Shuaib has journalistic articles verified as an article in Wikipedia احمد علي الأحمد (talk) 19:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmanlucas, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Chetsford (talk) 07:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jmanlucas. I appreciate your efforts to publish the page on Abd al-Mawla Naqi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abd_al-Mawla_Naqi). Unfortunately, the spelling of his last name was misspelled in translation from Arabic to English. The correct spelling and pronunciation is "Lenghi" or "Lengi"

It would be tremendously appreciated if this could be updated. Thank you for considering. Molenghi (talk) 00:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salvatore Distefano, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jmanlucas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salvatore Distefano".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]