Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru/Assessment

Peru Project‑class

This page is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. WikiProject Peru To-do: edit history watch purge Assess and prioritise articles (log) Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate Create: Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Peru national football team GAN: Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate: National University of San Marcos Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention

Can you please reassess the page Hector Bejar? I disagree it is of low importance, thanksLibertyofcourse (talk) 14:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I actually just found a pretty major error. For whatever reason, stub-class Peru articles are put into Category:Unassessed Peru articles instead of Category:Stub-class Peru articles. I don't know how to fix that. --Descendall 17:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. --Descendall 17:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has become apparent that we need standard criteria on how to establish importance for Peru-related articles. That way articles won't be continuously changed between top, high, mid and low importance depending on who reviews them. As a first step in that direction, AgainErick and me have developed a proposal on criteria for Top importance articles, you can check it out at Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Assessment/Top. This proposal is up for discussion, we hope to get as much feedback from members of this wikiproject so at the end we'll have the broadest consensus possible. --Victor12 03:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can start by looking at the criteria in other Country Wikiprojects--Andersmusician VOTE 03:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, we got some inspiration out of Wikipedia:WikiProject Argentina/Importance but tried to keep the number of top articles to the minimum. --Victor12 12:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]