Wikipedia:WikiProject Netherlands/Assessment

Netherlands pages by quality
Quality
	Total
FA	54
FL	14
A	1
GA	170
B	822
C	2,951
Start	11,832
Stub	17,103
List	873
Category	14,412
Disambig	54
File	259
Portal	9
Project	27
Redirect	723
Template	1,106
Assessed	50,410
Unassessed	29
Total	50,439
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 176,389			Ω = 5.36

Welcome to the assessment department of the Netherlands WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Netherlands related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Netherlands articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Netherlands WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. It is however considered ethical conduct not to assess articles in the writing of which you yourself has been an important editor

Can I rank an article as I like?

No. Every editor can award stub, start, C, and B class. However, the higher quality labels require more. Good Article and Featured Article status can only be awarded to articles that have gone through the official Wikipedia nomination procedures. A-class assessment are reserved for very good articles, and should have received and fairly addressed extensive peer review (from within or outside the project).

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it; if it has indeed been improved; or the rating was unfair, a better quality will be assigned. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

I agreed with the low rating, but I have now improved the article, how can I get my rating up?

Again, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Netherlands articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Netherlands articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Netherlands articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Netherlands articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Netherlands articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Netherlands articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Netherlands articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Netherlands articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Netherlands articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion]	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Psychology (as of January 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ball (as of September 2014)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of literary movements

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, you can request an assessment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Netherlands.

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

April 26, 2024

Reassessed

• At Eternity's Gate (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Caesar (band) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Coparck (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Jokinen Plan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Monarchy of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Curaçao (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Drenthe (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Flevoland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Friesland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Gelderland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Limburg (Netherlands) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in North Brabant (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Overijssel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Sint Maarten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in The Hague (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Zeeland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the Netherlands Antilles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Dutch monarchy (talk) removed.
• Frame (journal) (talk) removed.

April 25, 2024

Renamed

• Restitutions Committee (Netherlands) renamed to Restitutions Committee.

Reassessed

• Arne Slot (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dirk van Hogendorp (1761–1822) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:15th-century Dutch Roman Catholic bishops (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:15th-century Dutch bishops (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:15th-century Dutch clergy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:16th-century Dutch Roman Catholic bishops (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:16th-century Dutch bishops (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:18th-century Dutch journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:18th-century Dutch letter writers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:18th-century Dutch women educators (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:18th-century Dutch women journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:1950 in the Netherlands Antilles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:19th-century Dutch women journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:19th-century Dutch women musicians (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:20th-century Dutch women journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:21st-century Dutch women journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ambassadors of the Netherlands to Afghanistan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Defunct sports competitions in Curaçao (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate handball players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch journalists by century (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch lesbian sportswomen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch women journalists by century (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Expatriate sportspeople from the Dutch Caribbean (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacob Algera (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Megaliths in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Nazis assassinated by the Dutch resistance (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Nico van Straten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Restitutions Committee (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sailors (sport) from Amsterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sieges of Maastricht (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

April 24, 2024

Reassessed

• Bingo Players (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• National East Indies monument (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Colombian people of Dutch-Jewish descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch bisexual women (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch gay sportsmen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch male film score composers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch male opera composers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch opera composers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch people executed for witchcraft (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch women art historians (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch women politicians (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Football clubs in Súdwest-Fryslân (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Germany–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Jan Snellinck (III) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Jewish Dutch artists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Meierijstad (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Oss (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Ridderkerk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Veldhoven (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Organisations based in Zutphen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ships sunk by Dutch submarines (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sport in Súdwest-Fryslân (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sports competitions in the Curaçao (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Tennis tournaments in Curaçao (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:World Games bronze medalists for the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:World Games gold medalists for the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:World Games silver medalists for the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:World War II merchant ships of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:World War II ships of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Marnix van den Broeke (talk) removed.

April 23, 2024

Renamed

• Business Is Business (film) renamed to Business Is Business.

Reassessed

• Dutch invasions of Brazil (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• The Feast of Bacchus (Koninck) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:1910s in Amsterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:2024 in Dutch motorsport (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:21st-century Dutch pianists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Algerian people of Dutch descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Artists from North Brabant (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Artists from South Holland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Business Is Business (1971 film) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch-language musical groups from Belgium (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch BMX riders (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Expressionist painters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch abstract painters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch female indoor hockey players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch flower artists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch indoor hockey players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch male essayists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch male jazz musicians (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch military personnel by city (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch modern painters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch people of South American descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch tapestry artists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch women landowners (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:History of agriculture in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:March 2024 sports events in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Martial artists from Amsterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Massacres committed by the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Military history of Amsterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Mothers of Dutch monarchs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Nobility from the Austrian Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Nobility from the Habsburg Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Nobility from the Spanish Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:North American people of Dutch descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Pornography in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Post office buildings in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Rohda Raalte (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Speed skaters from North Holland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Speed skaters from South Holland (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Ter Hooge Castle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Togolese people of Dutch descent (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Westerwijzend (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• 2022–2023 mpox outbreak (talk) removed.
• Category:Dutch pornography (talk) removed.
• Category:Islands of the Caribbean part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (talk) removed.

April 22, 2024

Reassessed

• Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:2024 establishments in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Amsterdam in World War II (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Composition IX (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Deaths from colorectal cancer in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Deaths from esophageal cancer in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Deaths from prostate cancer in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Deaths from stomach cancer in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Dixons (Netherlands) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch electronic dance music DJs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Jop Delemarre (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Manuel Bosboom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Oostkerk, Middelburg (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Reinier Zonneveld (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• De Negotie (talk) removed.

April 21, 2024

Reassessed

• Ambush near the Bay of Manila (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Conflict between Willem Leyel and Bernt Pessart (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Martinikerk (Doesburg) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Skirmish at the Strait of Malacca (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Afghanistan–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Argentina–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Belize-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Bilateral relations of Sint Maarten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Brunei–Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Canada–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Comoros–Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Czechoslovakia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Republic-Habsburg monarchy relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Republic-Holy Roman Empire relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Republic–Habsburg monarchy relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch international relations scholars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:France–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Guatemala–Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Honduras-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ireland–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Kenya–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Madagascar–Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Nepal–Netherlands sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Panama relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-United Kingdom relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Vietnam relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-West Germany relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–Nicaragua relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–Pakistan sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–Portugal sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–Qatar sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–South Africa sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–Tajikistan relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–United Arab Emirates sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–United Kingdom sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–Zimbabwe sports relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Nijenhuis (Diepenheim) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Rens Raemakers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sint Maarten–United States relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sport in Lelystad (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sports clubs and teams in Arnhem (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Sports clubs and teams in Breda (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

April 20, 2024

Reassessed

• National Holocaust Names Memorial (Amsterdam) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Afghanistan-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Albania-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Andorra-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Angola-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Argentina-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Armenia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Armenia–Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Australia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Austria-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Azerbaijan-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Bangladesh-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Barbados-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Belgium-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Benin-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Bhutan-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Bilateral sports relations of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Bots (band) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Bulgaria-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Burkina Faso-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Cameroon-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Canada-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Cape Verde-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Card Players in a Rich Interior (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Celia Diemkoudre (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:China-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Conflict between Willem Leyel and Bernt Pessart (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Croatia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Death of Hans Kok (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Denmark-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dominican Republic-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ecuador-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Egypt-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Embassy of Sweden, The Hague (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Estonia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Fiji-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Finland-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Foreign relations of Sint Maarten (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:France-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Georgia (country)-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Germany-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ghana-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Greece-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Guyana-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Hungary-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Iceland-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:India-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Indonesia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Iran-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Iraq-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ireland-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Israel-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Jamaica-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Japan-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Jordan-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Kazakhstan-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Latvia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• List of best-selling albums in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Lithuania-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Luxembourg-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Malawi-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Malaysia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Mali-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Mauritania-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Mexico-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Moldova-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Monaco-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Morocco-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Mozambique-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Nepal-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-New Zealand relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Nigeria relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Norway relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Pakistan relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Papua New Guinea relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Philippines relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Poland relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Portugal relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Qatar relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Republic of Macedonia relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Romania relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Russia relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Sierra Leone relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-South Africa relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-South Korea relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Soviet Union relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Spain relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Sri Lanka relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Suriname relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Sweden relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Syria relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Tanzania relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Tunisia relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Turkey relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Ukraine relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-United States relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Uruguay relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Uzbekistan relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Venezuela relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Yemen relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Zambia relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands-Zimbabwe relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Netherlands–Philippines relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:The Gambia-Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Lars Ootes (talk) removed.