Wikipedia:WikiProject Netherlands/Assessment

Netherlands pages by quality
Quality
	Total
FA	53
FL	10
A	1
GA	162
B	654
C	2,442
Start	10,688
Stub	16,720
List	790
Category	12,008
Disambig	63
File	220
Portal	9
Project	29
Redirect	348
Template	1,046
Assessed	45,243
Unassessed	643
Total	45,886
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 165,821			Ω = 5.40

Welcome to the assessment department of the Netherlands WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Netherlands related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Netherlands articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Netherlands WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. It is however considered ethical conduct not to assess articles in the writing of which you yourself has been an important editor

Can I rank an article as I like?

No. Every editor can award stub, start, C, and B class. However, the higher quality labels require more. Good Article and Featured Article status can only be awarded to articles that have gone through the official Wikipedia nomination procedures. A-class assessment are reserved for very good articles, and should have received and fairly addressed extensive peer review (from within or outside the project).

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it; if it has indeed been improved; or the rating was unfair, a better quality will be assigned. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

I agreed with the low rating, but I have now improved the article, how can I get my rating up?

Again, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Netherlands}} project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Netherlands articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Netherlands articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Netherlands articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Netherlands articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Netherlands articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Netherlands articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Netherlands articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Netherlands articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Netherlands articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria The article meets the good article criteria: A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counterintuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article meets the six B-Class criteria: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Human (as of April 2019)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ring-tailed cardinalfish (as of June 2018)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues. More detailed criteria The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Crescent Falls (as of June 2018)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of June 2018)

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, you can request an assessment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Netherlands.

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record.

January 28, 2023

Reassessed

• Concert of The Hague (1659) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Ajamu Baly (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Bearded Man with a Beret (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Bianca Stigter (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Jan Lievens (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
• The Raising of Lazarus (Jan Lievens) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:1983 Dutch television series debuts (talk) removed.
• Template:Aruban political parties (talk) removed.
• Els Bendheim (talk) removed.
• Rezaul Kabir (talk) removed.

January 27, 2023

Reassessed

• Self-portrait with the Colosseum (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Catering Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Design Academy Eindhoven alumni (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• OVpay (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Paintings by Isaac Israëls (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Paintings by Jozef Israëls (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• File:Sgpstemmen1.png (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t)
• Wie is de Mol? (Dutch season 1) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Wie is de Mol? (Dutch season 5) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

January 26, 2023

Renamed

• Group of Ten (economics) renamed to Group of Ten (IMF).
• Saïd Hamulic renamed to Said Hamulic.

Reassessed

• Orhan Džepar (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Group of Ten (IMF) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• King of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Marisa Olislagers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Said Hamulic (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

January 25, 2023

Reassessed

• Dutch Association of Railway and Tramway Employees (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Marcel Dicke (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Nieuwmarkt metro station (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• The Vanishing (1988 film) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Arles: View from the Wheat Fields (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Association of Teachers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Catholic Printing Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Catholic Trade Union Federation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Catholic Union of Transport Personnel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Catholic Union of the Building and Wood Industries (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Musical Artists' Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Painters' Assistants' Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Police Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Teachers' Association (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Transport Workers' Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Union of Personnel in Government Service (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Construction Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Industrial Union of Agriculture (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Industrial Union of the Mining Industry (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Industrial Union of the Tobacco Industry (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Metalworkers' Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Printing Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Typographers' Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Union of Domestic Workers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Union of Trade and Office Workers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Union of the Building and Wood Industries (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Heinrich Campendonk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Portrait of Père Tanguy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Siebren van der Werf (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:The Traitors (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• View of Olinda (Post) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Violence against women in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)

January 24, 2023

Reassessed

• Joop Zoetemelk (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Kian Fitz-Jim (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Nicky Souren (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Plantations of Sint Eustatius (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Beauty Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• HNLMS Nautilus (1929) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Hertogin Hedwigepolder (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ships built by Rotterdamsche Droogdok Maatschappij (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Ships built in Rotterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Walrus-class submarine (1953) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

January 23, 2023

Reassessed

• Sumatra's East Coast Residency (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Arts, Information and Media Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Arts Union (Netherlands) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Deaths by horse-riding accident in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Dutch Litho-, Photo- and Chemographers' Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch animated film directors (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch women opera singers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• G. Kolff & Co. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• General Dutch Union of Workers in the Baking, Chocolate and Sugar Working Industries (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Industrial Union of Agriculture and Food (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Industrial Workers' Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Industrial Workers' Union NKV (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Jordy van Workum (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Marcel Dicke (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Mass media in Batavia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Netherlands-swimming-bio-stub (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
• Terrance Pieters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Tijmen Snel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Henk Smits (talk) removed.

January 22, 2023

Assessed

• Category:19th-century Dutch journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:19th-century Dutch male writers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:19th-century Dutch non-fiction writers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:20th-century Dutch non-fiction writers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:21st-century Dutch journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:21st-century Dutch non-fiction writers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Chris Landman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch gay writers (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch male songwriters (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch music journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch non-fiction writers by century (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch political journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch radio journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch track cyclists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch women journalists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Engineers from Amsterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Federation of Dutch Trade Unions (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• G. Ch. Aalders (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Gerard Bunk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Indonesian companies established in 1933 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Journalists from Amsterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Journalists from The Hague (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Julie de Graag (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Matthijs Quast (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Mitchel Bergkamp (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Stan Maas (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Teun van Grunsven (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)