Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels/Assessment

Shortcut
  • WP:BRIDGE/A
Assessment links
Index · Statistics · Log
Unassessed articles:
Quality · Importance
Bridge and Tunnel articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 10 14 26
FL 2 2
GA 1 7 26 56 90
B 10 20 59 131 2 222
C 9 27 115 530 25 706
Start 7 63 326 2,605 65 3,066
Stub 1 26 169 3,025 91 3,312
List 4 29 55 325 1 2 416
Category 2 2,494 2,496
Disambig 129 129
File 44 44
Project 7 7
Template 164 164
NA 2 4 57 176 239
Other 6 6
Assessed 32 176 766 6,745 3,021 185 10,925
Unassessed 2 2 126 130
Total 32 176 766 6,747 3,023 311 11,055
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 38,866 Ω = 5.24

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels. This will assist in assessing articles in the scope of the project.

Assessment instructions

Quality

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles)  FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles)  A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles)  GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles)  FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Category
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Disambig
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Draft
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) File
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Portal
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Project
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) Template
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles) NA
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Bridge and Tunnel articles) ???

Quality scale

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion] Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of bridges to the Island of Montreal
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Lincoln Tunnel
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Kingston Bridge, London
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Woy Woy Tunnel
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Silver Street, Cambridge
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Knowlton Covered Bridge
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of bridges in Hubei
Category Any category falls under this class. Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. Category:Bridges by river
Disambig Any disambiguation page falls under this class. The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title. Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title. London Bridge (disambiguation)
File Any page in the file namespace falls under this class. The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content. Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited. File:Lowell covered bridge.jpg
Project All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels
Template Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. Template:Infobox tunnel
NA Any non-article page that fits no other classification. The page contains no article content. Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified.
??? Article quality has not yet been assessed. Articles for which a valid quality rating has not yet been provided are listed in this category. A quality parameter should be assigned according to the assessment department of the WikiProject.

Importance

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles)  ??? 

Importance scale

WikiProject article importance scheme
Importance Criteria Example
 Top The article Bridge, types of bridges, or any article that forms the basis of all information. Bascule bridge, Cantilever bridge
 High Famous bridges, well-known bridges, or bridges that cross a major waterway that carries a major (rail)road. San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge, Benjamin Franklin Bridge
 Mid Bridges that cross a major and/or scenic river/waterway (such as most of the crossings of the Delaware River), well-known demolished bridges, lists of crossings. Poplar Street Bridge, Cross-Harbor Rail Tunnel
 Low Bridges and demolished bridges that are very less-known, but have enough information to be notable. Cape Fear Memorial Bridge
 NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. Category:Bridges
 ??? Subject importance has not yet been assessed.

Requests for assessments

This project now has zero assessments awaiting assessment in the Bridges and Tunnels project. Help keeping it that way would be appreciated by this WikiGnome.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment log

April 27, 2024

Reassessed

Assessed

April 26, 2024

Renamed

Assessed

  • Hercílio Luz Bridge (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
  • Weedon Viaduct (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

April 25, 2024

Assessed

April 24, 2024

Assessed

  • Kamchiq Tunnel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
  • Nzi River Bridge collapse (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
  • Yabakei Bridge (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

April 23, 2024

Reassessed

Assessed

Removed

  • Category:Bridges completed in 1192 (talk) removed.
  • Category:Tunnels completed in 1480 (talk) removed.
  • Category:Tunnels completed in 1679 (talk) removed.

April 22, 2024

Assessed

  • Category:Bridges in Bavaria (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
  • King Louis Bridge (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
  • Ponts Jumeaux (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
  • Puente La Amistad de Taiwán (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
  • Puente de España (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

April 21, 2024

Reassessed

  • Dunedin Causeway (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bridges_and_Tunnels/Assessment&oldid=1026415445"