Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivian Hunt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vivian Hunt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article-subject has requested deletion per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. She is often quoted, mentioned, or included in roundups and blurbs, but is not the subject of significant, in-depth coverage. COI disclosure: I am affiliated with her employer and have been asked to start a deletion discussion on her behalf. CorporateM (Talk) 15:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep That only applies to "relatively unknown, non-public figures". I don't think she qualifies due to the in-depth sources about her. Philafrenzy (talk) 15:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article should stay. She does not seem to qualify to deletion per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE as she is not "relatively unknown". Gianvito Scaringi (talk) 16:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as above, she is subject to in-depth coverage and is not relatively unknown. Million_Moments (talk) 08:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: well-sourced article on a public figure. PamD 09:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, agree with above editors about indepth coverage and 'good' sources meeting WP:BASIC, also, doesn't having a DBE usually qualify for an article? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:34, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete We actually lack the indepth coverage that would consistute a true pass of the GNG. Even if we didnt, nothing about Hunt causes her to be so notable that we should have an article on her against her own wish not to have such an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources are enough to establish significant notability. Smartyllama (talk) 13:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources pass GNG. If this article is deleted then other notables such as Nancy Griffeth should be deleted as well.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.