Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Oregon Extension

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. in light of article improvements. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Oregon Extension

The Oregon Extension (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Only non-primary hit is from a student newspaper; all other search results are apparently about an unrelated expansion of the national park in which the program takes place. Fermiboson (talk) 00:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, United States of America, and Oregon. Fermiboson (talk) 00:11, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Article author has self-declared COI, see here. Fermiboson (talk) 00:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Oregon Extension is a 48 year old university level education program. Not associated with any one university, it intentionally consists of a small select group of students and faculty. Failing to meet Fermiboson standard of GNG does not equate to unworthiness to be published on this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonDias19 (talk • contribs) 03:02, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I have added sources and content. Some sources are campus newspapers. However, there is an entire chapter in a book as well as signification coverage in an Oxford University Press book. Sources confirm notability. Rublamb (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep in view of the book sources described above that have been added to the article for a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.