Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinkha (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sinkha

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability issues since 2007, can find little not self-published, unable to spot any likely viable merge targets. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts, Comics and animation, and Computing. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: previous debate (in 2008!) seems to have been an easily delete but article was recreated soon afterwards. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 21:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per last time, and maybe salt. Johnbod (talk) 21:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, let's remove niche projects like Sinkha, it's just useless information wasted on mighty Wikipedia Kaminari (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing whatsoever wrong with niche projects or useless information, providing they have some sort of secondary sourcing. This does not seem to be the case, as most of the links seem to be to websites with a COI, and next to none of the material is sourced; all-in-all it's had a good run. Just being snarky doesn't help that, sadly; do you have anything constructive to add to the discussion? BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 14:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find reviews on Metacritic, and BDtheque in French is user-generated, so of no help. There are no reviews that I can see. Oaktree b (talk) 20:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.