Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Ford (technologist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Rendering withdrawal with extent delete !vote moot Star Mississippi 20:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Ford (technologist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the sources given are 3P. Additionally, I'm having a bit of trouble finding 3P sources about this individual, seems non-notable. Sohom (talk) 16:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:14, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lots of articles published in Wired written by the individual, but nothing about this person found otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I've expanded the article with some additional details and various new references (mostly 3P). Ford is notable in his field (tech/design, and technology journalism). I do not know him, but I know his work.
Keep. Agree with above commenter - subject is notable in his field. -- asilvering (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw: (as nominator) Per previous commenters, article has been sufficiently expanded and notability has been sufficiently proven. Sohom (talk) 14:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.