Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Drummond (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 08:17, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Drummond

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

User:Frgewhqwth attempted to nominate this for deletion, citing its first AfD. I fixed the tag. —Ignatzmice ^talk _contribs 00:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While the first AfD resulted in a Delete, the actress has been active since then. I believe the article therefore has merit. Note that my opinion is colored by Frgewhqwth's actions, which I see as in bad faith (or at least reckless and rude). —Ignatzmice ^talk _contribs 00:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Until reputable sources are found. nerd fighter 00:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It/she's notable. Davey2010 Talk 21:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – a) Procedural: no reason provided by nominator; lack of good will. b) As pointed out by Ignatzmice, five years after the previous AfD, she's accumulated some notable roles in notable shows as required by WP:NACTOR. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.