Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Gilbert (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was IAR Try again‎. Nominator is a sock. Any established editor who believes Gilbert isn't notable is welcome to start an AfD. We're not wasting editors' time here. Star Mississippi 02:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Gilbert

Jennifer Gilbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable event planner, fails WP:GNG. Fhektii (talk) 12:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Best chance is at ACTOR for the "Real Housewives" show, otherwise sourcing is primary. Non-notable career. I can only find some mention of the "Housewives" appearances [1], [2], which I don't think are enough. Second one deals with her son's health issues, first is a "meet the celebrity" fluff article. Oaktree b (talk) 15:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: ATHOR is a bust, can only find one book review [3] Oaktree b (talk) 15:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 18:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Massachusetts, New York, and Vermont. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedural Comment This is one of a series of deletions started by a brand new account that has now been blocked as a sockpuppet. See [4]. Not sure if a procedural close is in order. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:G5 doesn't apply as checkuser hasn't connected them to any master yet. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  G5 is a speedy deletion reason and irrelevant to procedurally closing a nomination made by a banned user. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Oaktree and my WP:BEFORE. WP:GNG is not met. 84.146.2.66 (talk) 11:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC) — 84.146.2.66 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Blocked sock. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 21:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.