Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Knox (businessman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (consult) @ 19:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Knox (businessman)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable executive. No indication of significance to the wider community, independent of the companies themselves. LS1979 (talk) 09:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have since expanded the page, which now includes his appearance in a newspaper article listing him as one of South Australia's most influential people. Also added a section re: salary controversy and another showing membership of various organisations, boards etc. More to come... I may have launched the page prematurely but I hope I can justify its existence. Danimations (talk) 12:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:07, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Whilst I can't seem to find a WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE guideline, he is a long-term CEO of an ASX 50 company, so I would think some form of assumed notability would apply. Basic google searches are difficult to find specific features on him due to the many quotes of him in his capacity as CEO, but articles like these from The Age, Adelaide Now and SMH are about him as much as the company. The-Pope (talk) 10:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for much the same reasons as The-Pope. The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.