Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balti wine (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 22:56, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Balti wine

Balti wine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page appears to completely fail the notability guidelines for companies, and the organisation behind the brand also seems to have vanished, having not been notable in the first place, IMO B800h (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Wine, Companies, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No coverage for this wine, it's all foods to eat for Christmas now that pop up. Lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Original Nominator here. Delete: I'm convinced that this wasn't notable to begin with, just the result of some good PR. There were a cluster of articles when the brand launched. It now appears to have been defunct for a long time. B800h (talk) 21:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• B800h, I have relocated the above text which was above the heading, and struck the "delete" opinion, as your nomination already provides that. AllyD (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: There were substantial Keep opinions in the 2007 AfD (and also opinions worth reading on the article Talk page). The original firm seems to have ceased 13-14 years ago (Companies House), though there were several similarly named subsequent firms. I feel too much was resting on the Manchester Evening News interview with the founder, which would be discounted under the later WP:NCORP standards, and too much was riding on the firm's own claim that their Argentinian wine branding was a market innovation and on expectation of a great future for this distribution / branding start-up. There was also a sponsorship deal [1] but again, such are insufficient for current notability standards. AllyD (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.