User talk:Warofdreams/2022

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ulster unionism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Ulster unionism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Heanor (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Socialist Action (United States) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialist Action (United States) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Toa Nidhiki05 15:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Warofdreams.

Following a discussion at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard, the minimum activity requirements for bureaucrats have been updated to also include the the recently updated minimum editing requirements for administrators (i.e. at least 100 edits every 5 years). This will be enforced beginning in January 2023. Should you no longer wish to volunteer as a bureaucrat you may request removal at SRP and.or let us know at WP:BN.

Best regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested at the freshly-created bureaucrat chat. Useight (talk) 03:07, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article International Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This group only appears to be notable insofar as its relationship to the International Marxist Group, the article for which already contains most of the relevant information and could easily have the rest moved over to it. Given that this article only has one inline citation, which is a permanently dead link, I propose this article be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WarofDreams - Thank you for creating American Flint Glass Workers' Union. As info, some copies of the union's monthly magazine, The American Flint, are posted online. TwoScars (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded Listed buildings in Dronfield which you created. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a great improvement, always really good to see the articles you create on listed buildings. Warofdreams talk 11:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Warofdreams, I have started a bureaucrat discussion for ScottishFinnishRadish's RfA. It can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ScottishFinnishRadish/Bureaucrat chat. Thanks in advance. Acalamari 01:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The new user tool pointed me in the direction of one of your articles. I noticed you created many articles and I suggest that they be consolidated into your master list as follows I did not want to do anything too radical. Also I could use your input and help..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1040s_in_architecture and others including https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1030s_in_architecture etc...

Merge to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1000s_in_architecture

or

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_architecture

Flibbertigibbets (talk) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 23:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've not looked at those articles in years, but thanks for your message! I think there is too much material to merge to the overall timeline, and 1000s in architecture is about that specific decade, but the articles could potentially be merged to an 11th century in architecture, along similar lines to those on the 10th century in architecture and many earlier centuries. Warofdreams talk 23:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to help me work on it; I am fumbling around a bit (its a bit over my skill level).. Or if you want to leave it alone that is fine too. I will remove the merge tag.. Or I could look to find sources.... or I will just work to consolidate into 11th century architecture. I am more than willing to follow your lead and get some experience points in the process.. PS its good to meet an early Wikipedian regards Flibbertigibbets (talk) Flibbertigibbets (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucienne Abraham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucienne Abraham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LordVoldemort728 (talk) 12:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Warofdreams,

There has been a discussion around whether Cardiff Arms Park should have been split into separate articles or reverted back into one single article (as it was when it became a Good Article). See the original article. I requested comments (RfC) from other editors for this discussion. It was agree with Mn1548 (who made the Bold edit) that 1st December should be the last day for discussions. I am well aware that it can't be an purely an arithmetic calculation as to the final decision, therefore tomorrow, or sometime afterwards, can you consider the pros and cons of the discussions on both sides and make a final decision. I hope you can help. You had welcomed me to Wikipedia on 19 July 2007. SethWhales ^talk 22:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to take a look at it. I will probably have time tomorrow. Warofdreams talk 23:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Warofdreams. SethWhales ^talk 05:45, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} [reply]

Donner60 (talk) 06:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, happy Christmas to you too! Warofdreams talk 21:44, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]