User talk:TzarN64

Hi TzarN64! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Sea Cow (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Likely WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Untitled AEW video game and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Untitled AEW video game, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 01:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TzarN64! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 01:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to move the page Kinemaster to KineMaster because i got it all wrong Please dont block me, i am trying to move it TzarN64 (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TzarN64: I fixed it. ChromiumOverload (Talk 📨) 19:45, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Return YouTube Dislike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. EDM fan 2 (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on KineMaster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://gsmzee.blogspot.com/2020/12/kinemaster-pro-apk-download-video.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MarioGom (talk) 08:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TzarN64, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheTechnician27, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Return YouTube Dislike, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return YouTube Dislike .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 22:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Return YouTube Dislike. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Return YouTube Dislike, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return YouTube Dislike until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Return YouTube Dislike. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. EDM fan 2 (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TzarN64! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, About Return YouTube Dislike again, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if anyone has brought this up yet, but you seem to have done.. uh, this on your user talk page. While I'm unaware of the context for whatever that was, it does seem aggressive and I'm concerned about where it was coming from and what or who it was supposed to be directed at. Please remember to assume good faith and not throw f-bombs at other users. (Unless I'm reading the situation wrong and there's some other explanation for that diff.) casualdejekyll (talk) 17:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Needed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elli (talk | contribs) 23:18, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TzarN64, hope all is well. I wanted to highlight a few rules we have at Articles for Deletion (AfD), which you should strive to abide by:

• Per WP:DISCUSSAFD, AfD is not a numerical vote. The result of the discussion is not a vote count, but a determination of the community's consensus based on which arguments hold the most weight. You are expected to produce your own analysis of the nominator's and of your peer's concerns.
• Consequently, arguments that are WP:JUSTAVOTE[1], WP:EVERYONEELSE [2], and WP:ILIKEIT [3] are more likely than not to be ignored by the closer of the deletion discussion. Please review all the arguments to avoid in deletion discussions.
• To have more productive deletion discussions, you should evaluate the claims of the nominator of the discussion. The most common one is WP:GNG.
• You should always sign comments on Wikipedia with four tildes (~~~~), otherwise other editors will have to do that manually for you.

Cheers, Pilaz (talk) 12:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Remains WP:TOOSOON - no evidence of significant coverage currently, so reviews are needed. (Plus, when it actually releases, it will have a real title).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Untitled AEW video game and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Untitled AEW video game, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TzarN64! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, when is it gonna be merged, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw that you were merging the articles proposed for merge in the merge discussion. I'm not going to revert you, however I've requested assistance in closing the discussion since I'd like to make sure I do it properly so if need be, you may end up getting reverted just to it's done correctly. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 16:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. None of those sources are remotely close to meeting WP:RS; the material if not of encyclopedic interest. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TzarN64! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can someone upload some files, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Wii Menu at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... in case you might have seen an editor that personally attacked you.. just want to say sorry about that. The editor has now been blocked. You did an effort and that's great!-- I was once in your position, so don't listen to the bullies and listen to advice from the nice editors. GeraldWL 17:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, if you have issues with any editors in the future, please make someone aware of it so they can be correctly handled, there is alot of guidence on such on WP:ANI. -- 𝒥𝒶𝒹𝑒 ^(Talk) • 𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓎/𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓂]

Huh? TzarN64 (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was a minor incident with a user on WP:TH who said some.. very unnessecery comments. -- 𝒥𝒶𝒹𝑒 ^(Talk) • 𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓎/𝓉𝒽𝑒𝓂]

can i get a link? TzarN64 (talk) 18:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1073605900. Dont worry though, they're now blocked. GeraldWL 18:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Socks arguing with other socks? OH boy. Oaktree b (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Amazon Xbox 360.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.theverge.com/2012/5/29/3050440/amazon-instant-video-xbox-360. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster _talk 14:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TzarN64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i am trying to build an encylopedia and i am sorry, i wont do it again and i think i deserve being blocked for a week or a month. TzarN64 (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. This is not the way we behave here, and nothing in your unblock request convinces me you understand and will behave significantly differently if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for uploading File:YouTube Wii Banner.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Amazonn wii.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect TheTekkitRealm and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 21#TheTekkitRealm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of streaming services for the Nintendo Wii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of streaming services for the Nintendo Wii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slywriter (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TzarN64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled AEW video game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TzarN64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't expect to be unblocked, but yes i do admit i am TzarN64. However, i did learn my lesson and improved Wikipedia for the better. For an example, i made articles Tomb of the Mask Bendgate, and Antennagate. I apologize for my past actions as TzarN64, and TheSecondComing10. (this message was orignally posted to Talk:SMBMovieFan, but if i get unblocked i promise not to make anymore sock accounts. I learned my lesson, and the proof is in the articles i now created. Tomb of the Mask, Antennagate, and Bendgate was suitable in Wikipedias guideline. TzarN64 (talk) 01:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As Liz says, your best bet is to take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no socking. PhilKnight (talk) 06:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TzarN64 (talk) 01:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to see that you still have access to this account. You need to come back in 6 months to file an unblock request. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TzarN64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to first address that yes, I did formerly do sockpuppetery, and i am sorry. I know i've created some articles that's not encyclopedic, but i've learnt from my mistakes and i promise i will never do sockpuppet or do those past mistakes ever again. I am truly sorry. I really wanna help contribute again, so please consider this unblock request and i promise to never do those mistakes again. Thanks, TzarN64 (talk) 06:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed WP:LOUTSOCK. As you have demonstrated you've learned exactly nothing from your prior bad behaviour, this is an easy decline. Yamla (talk) 10:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TzarN64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I haven't used an sockpuppet or logged out edit since Summerslam2022 6 months ago, if there was any edit our my IP then that's not me. Please, just give me a second chance and i will prove why i belong on Wikipedia. TzarN64 (talk) 16:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't believe you're telling the truth regarding recent logged-out edits. Spicy (talk) 02:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TzarN64 (talk) 16:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just leave this for another checkuser to review.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I swore i did not make any logged-out edits. I have made the requirement of common offer and i did research on wikipedia unblock policies and followed them clearly. TzarN64 (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know common offer isn't a get out free card, but i clearly made the requirement and have done no logged out edits. TzarN64 (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has been unblocked under standard offer, I think I classify as someone who can tell you what you need to do in order to be unblocked under the standard offer. The key is to be honest. Tell the checkusers nothing but the truth. Lies will get you in a deeper hole. If you're actually someone who vandalizes just to vandalize and nothing else... I can't help you there. Also, when making an unblock request, don't make it short and effortless. They won't believe anything you say. And I'm not trying to be secret here, I'm just trying to help because I kinda feel bad. I hope I could... help a little bit. Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thatoneguylol101 I know, and that's what i did. I'm making another unblock request soon, i haven't socked since SummerSlam2022, and i really wanna get back to editing since i love editing on wikipedia.

If you have any advice to helping me get unblocked, i'd greatly appreicate it. TzarN64 (talk) 00:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TzarN64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

It's been 3 years since i've been blocked on TzarN64. Back in Feb 2022 when i initially got blocked for WP:NOTHERE, i created KaptianKharisma to try and evade the block. Which obviously failed. Many months go by and i create TheSecondComing10, SMBMovieFan, and Summerslam2022 to try and edit normally again, which obviously failed because i sockpuppeted. This leads to today, 5:22 PM on April 29, 2024, and I am making an unblock request. I understand that using one account to vandalize and one account to do good actions on is not right and the exact definition of sockpuppeting. If I get unblocked, I will be sure to make necessary edits only and not vandalize and sockpuppet like I did 3 years ago. And Summerslam2022 and other sockpuppet accounts will be put to rest. Thank you. TzarN64 (talk) 21:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The account mentined below was blocked 8 months ago, and there is still evidence of logged out editing. If you want to be unblocked, you'll need to take the standard offer here. No editing, logged out or with a sock for a minimum of a year.Do this in good faith, and your next unblock request will be taken in better consideration. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2022 was two years ago, not three as you are repeatedly claiming in your unblock request. I'll also note you were sockpuppeting just months ago with Summerslam2022, not three years ago. --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla It's an grammar error, i obviously meant 2 years ago. And i know that i've sockpuppeted 6 months ago with Summerslam2022, but according to the Standard Offer, it's an minimum requirement for 6 months. I know this isnt a get out of free card, but it's something to consider. TzarN64 (talk) 22:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RickinBaltimore notes more recent block evasion. Please follow the advice offered by RickinBaltimore, above. --Yamla (talk) 22:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't have any sockpuppet or logged out edits since Summerslam2022 which is 6 months ago. TzarN64 (talk) 22:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You'll excuse us if we find it hard to trust you are being honest with us, given your history and given RickinBaltimore's findings. Regardless, I've given you all the information I can. I won't respond further. --Yamla (talk) 22:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... All of my unblock requests has been denied and i don't know what to do now. It's been 8 months since i last sockpuppeted which clearly meets the minimum requirement of the standard offer and i've also promised to never do the things that originally got me blocked in the first place. Will i never get a second chance to prove that i can make helpful contributions to wikipedia? TzarN64 (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We need more than your promise. Many people promise us that they won't do things and then go right back to doing them. We need you to convince us that things will be different in the future and to tell us how. If you haven't already, please see the unblock appeals guide to learn how to craft a request likely to be accepted. 331dot (talk) 21:33, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot I know i need to prove and convince the administrators that i won't repeat what i originally got blocked for under WP:SOCK and WP:NOTHERE. I really wanna prove that i can contribute positively and be given an second chance. I did contribute greatly to Wii U Gamepad, but that was under an sockpuppet and therefore does not count. TzarN64 (talk) 00:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]