User talk:Tawker/Archive 1

The userbox template on your page is empty. Did a vandal delete it, or is this on purpose? --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 06:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI that a discussion is being made to change the TOR link on this template here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on open proxies. If you have any thoughts, your input would be appreciated. SkierRMH (talk) 06:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, previously you expressed interest in participating in the Wikipedia:Admin coaching project. We are currently conducting a reconfirmation drive to give coaches the opportunity to update their information and capacity to participate in the project. Please visit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to update your status. Also, please remember to update your capacity (5th table variable) in the form of a fraction (eg. 2/3 means you are currently coaching 2 students, and could accept 1 more student). Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 09:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'd be happy to be part of the podcast. I'm scheduled to do a radio show on Wednesday the 5th; someone might want to see if that includes anything interesting for the podcast: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/bcradio/ -- John Broughton (♫♫) 22:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and, if possible, discuss :). Thanks, Martinp23 18:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Discospinster you mentioned a support regarding bots, so I presume you mean the Cobi RFA, unfortunately, it's been closed. Just thought I'd inform you. Rudget. 16:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster _talk 23:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and I hope you're good! - I thought I'd drop you a line with a couple of questions - firstly to see if you had any idea when / if Mediawiki might have RSS capabilities at all... I'm presuming the answer is that it just can't do it, and it's not on the horizon - but it's worth asking anywhooo, I guess. It also leads me to my more cheeky question - which is to see if you would be at all interested in creating notthe.wikipediaweekly.org at all, and maybe hosting an mp3 file or two? - my small efforts in encouraging community chit chat are intended to be complementary to your own esteemed 'round tables' and interviews - and I've had a few emails from people asking about an RSS feed - which I think is a good idea in principle, but lack the clue to implement / deliver.....

give some thought, and let me know if something like kicking in for the hosting costs might be appropriate, or if you've got any questions at all.... cheers - Privatemusings (talk) 02:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Thank you for your support in my RFA. The passed with a final count of (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 18:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to Wikipedia and I am trying to create a legitimate article. You wrote a sarcastic comment on why the page should be deleted. I am just learning the ropes here, please allow my article to stay up as I aquire all the neccessary information and references to be a relevant, informative and important article on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nra4ever5585 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there any level of protection on the article Jimmy Wales, yet there are few other biographies of living persons on Wikipedia that are so protected? Is it because you and Jimmy don't trust the "wiki way" to produce responsible, accountible reference pages related to living people, but you extend the courtesy of "protection" to those who are on the "inside"? It just doesn't seem fair. Like a Chevy salesman who won't let his family drive anything but BMW's. You seem like a hypocrite, just like Jimmy. - Six Eleven (talk) 22:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1]--Filll (talk) 02:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Vancouver Inactive list. The WikiProject Vancouver is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Vancouver/Inactive and move your name over to the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Vancouver/Members list. Also the WikiProject is currently discussing some proposed changes on the talk page. Thank you for your time. Mkdw^talk 08:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to see relevant discussion here. GreenJoe 04:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree, in principle. However, it has not been officially announced. Seeing how that is the most impportant thing here, its probably safe to wait. After all, if all is true, it will only be about 12 more hours or so. Kaiser matias (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about that. I protected both Vancouver Canucks and Mike Gillis until Wednesday night, Vancouver time. Should keep the pages stable until everything is sorted out, officially. Kaiser matias (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Meetup Please come to an informal gathering of Vancouver Wikipedians, Monday, May 5 at 6:30 pm. It will be at Benny's Bagels, 2505 West Broadway. We'd love to see you there, and please invite others! Watch the Vancouver Meetup page for details. This box: view • talk • edit

Regards, Mkdw^talk 22:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, is seems redundant. :) Can we remove it? REgards, NonvocalScream (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is redundant yes - and yet in the interests of transparency it makes sense to make it stand out that we're writing about something closely associated with the site. I took the idea from Wikinews - basically keep it as a disclaimer notice. I'm not going to edit war over it - it just seemed a good idea to me -- Tawker (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like a good enough reason to me. I'm not set on reverting anyone. :) Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 01:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikimediaMention has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Cenarium (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a mini-RFC over at Template talk:Csa and I'd love your feedback. Thanks. GreenJoe 12:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, sorry again on the C-61 bill, I can remove the criticism part if you want. I'm not really that good at editing wikis, and you're probably better than me, so I'll stop instead if you want. Noian (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you say the page would follow under

This article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. Feel free to improve this article or discuss changes on the talk page, but please note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

or not?Noian (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay this is just me (sorry to bother you again) but do you know how to multi ref the same thing? I think there was something like that when I was reading how to do references a while ago, but I guess, the same resource is used twice and the second time the cite note click doesn't work because it brings it to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_C-61#endnote_http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/06/12/tech-copyright.html

instead of:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_C-61#cite_note-0

and replacing the brackets with the greater than and less than method of ref just creates duplicates in notes

(well, as far as I know on my browser), just something trivial Noian (talk) 21:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do you know what caused it?Noian (talk) 18:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do what was done with the $20,000, say that "since bill 61-c doesn't apply to all" (or maybe we can combine both together), the following will happen based on previous legislation:

listlistlist

in addition, other legislation (like ACTA) have been proposed to make the following changes:

listlistlist

See main article acta

or something like that (really roughh outline) Noian (talk) 18:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created, PUMA Pac, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 02:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since I didn't read all of the PDF, is the criticism about the poll in the PDF cite or not? Depending on the answer, I might move the cbc one to a earlier spot and leave the PDF one there. Thanks ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 23:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for me to get the AntiVandalBot's Source, thanks, T^heDJA^tC^lubR^ock :-) ^(T/C) 20:03, 25 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I'm curious about the reasoning behind this move - I added a note on this here: Talk:The Spirit#Move/name. (Emperor (talk) 00:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Concur with Emperor — please discuss before making such a drastic change. Wiki policy is not to begin article names with definite (e.g. "the") or indefinite (e.g. "a") articles.

If you would go to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (definite and indefinite articles at beginning of name)#Other cases, in fact, you will see Joker (comics) used as an example of proper naming. He's the Joker, as Denny Colt is the Spirit. "Joker (comics), "Spirit (comics)". Thanks, -- Tenebrae (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Spirit_(comics)#Move.2Fname -- Tawker (talk) 05:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When deleting pages Tony Dadson please remember to delete the redirect pages as well Tony dadson, thank you Dbiel ^(Talk) 22:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You recently deleted Paul M. Warner--would you please move the article to my talk page so I may work on it--it is a crucial article in relation to a current FLC. Thank you. --Eustress (talk) 15:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the approval on my bot task request. I wasn't even done filing it and it was approved. :) Rockfang (talk) 19:13, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for granting me the rollback capability, I'll make sure to use it wisely! Deamon138 (talk) 02:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a small change on your userpage ,so that the category is sorted properly instead of "U" for "User:" . Hope you won't mind. :) -- Tinu Cherian - 07:55, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://stashbox.org/v/151705/madeworseincanada.mp3 (I scanned with AVG, didn't make it, but no guarantees) ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 16:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the BRFA, Can you approve atleast 25 edits ? That is the minimum number of categories needed ( without intersection) to build the category tree properly. -- Tinu Cherian - 05:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Task Trial is completed. Kindly have a look. Thanks in advance -- Tinu Cherian - 05:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at the references I provided at here please? I edit conflicted with your closing of the AFD. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came here about the same thing. A popular global website has just linked to this article, your deletion of this article was rather unfortunate timing. I would suggest immediate reinstating of the article in keeping with common courtesy to the large volume of potential hits. JayKeaton (talk) 10:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In any case thank you for not locking the page too. I do not plan on recreating it myself, as I cannot commit enough time and research to it (and because the edit history has now been deleted so there is nothing to build on), but by not locking the article you can allow someone else with more spare time to recreate the article. JayKeaton (talk) 12:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still hit or miss - I've restored it pending a full AfD -- Tawker (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - is your website down temporarily or permanently? I can't access http://tawker.com/tutorials/ or the root site. Thanks. Cormaggio is learning 14:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is, I switched servers and it never really got put back up. I should fix that sometime. -- Tawker (talk) 17:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tawker, can you be more specific about your tag. I have no problem re-writing more, and I do see some sentences that read too much like a brochure. But some more specific feed-back from you would be helpful, and if you take a look at the comments section, I did give ample time to comment about proposed changes.Nocandu1976 (talk) 12:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you... ...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff 22:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason for the deletion? Your summary did not provide one. I had plans to update it with new content sometime this week but the page did not meet any criteria for deletion. Thanks --Patrick (talk) 05:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah there are a few good articles that I found on Nexis that shows notable but only have access to that at work. They have been involved in a nifty little lawsuit against the Kentucky government that attracted some attention. It's also one of the oldest weekly newspapers in the country. --Patrick (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great thanks. I'll try and update it this week. Since I have you, do you mind moving a talk page. I moved the project page since there was a discussion on removing Economics from the project title, since we already have a economics wikiproject, but the talk page isn't moving.

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business and Economics to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business. Thanks --Patrick (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you restore the talk page too? - PennySpender1983 (talk) 03:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Lampman (talk) 01:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tawker, I'm going to revert your last edit to CFS regarding the mandate issue. I'm also reminding you that I would like you to remove the paragraph you added as you know it is not sourced and not relevant. Nocandu1976 (talk) 19:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first has been reviewed by another party and edited to that extent. The second paragraph is entirely relevant given the legal papers served surrounding using "CFS" to describe a provincial chapter which brands itself as "CFS." The section has been directly cited and additional cites available via simple web searches. I'm not removing it. -- Tawker (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tawker: With the first sentence, your second edit to that is fine, although I saw no reason to tinker with the sentence in the first place. my mistake I just got mixed up between that and your first edit which wasn't so neutral sounding.

With the second paragraph, it's relevancy is in question, it is not notable, and it is an non-constructive edit. Howcome you didn't bring this up in the discussion page like you are supposed to. You are on wikipedia long enough you should know this.

Also, you added another unqualified edit to the 2008 referendums section. We talked about this didn't we? You and I, I don't understand why you'd go ahead and insert "independent elections administrator." We were talking about this for days but then you try to sneak it in the backdoor. Be upfront and reasonable, let's talk this shit out or the page is going to continue to be crappy, marred by bad grammar, spelling mistakes, and non-neutral language.

Nocandu1976 (talk) 21:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is that? The template looks messed up. Also, imo, I wouldn't rate the article B until the criticism section gets revised, but I'm not really sure what's the line between C and B....ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 21:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cause the subject was re:CFS, and it also mentioned C-61, so I'm confused as to if you did it accidentally sending it to the wrong person or if the subject was just entered incorrectly. I replied, btw, assuming you were referring to C-61ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 22:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

editWhat I meant by criticism revised is a prose revision to make it more 'readable', not to remove things. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 22:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of University of Windsor Students' Alliance. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Me-123567-Me (talk) 00:43, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, as I've been going thru the list of users with the ACC flag, you've given this seemingly long inactive bot IPBE, ACC and rollback. Can they be removed? If there's some pressing need to leave it with those rights, then disregard. cheers, –xeno (talk) 21:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Scandalpedia, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scandalpedia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. rootology (C)(T) 22:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Head of Skate, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Head of Skate is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Head of Skate, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

State valid reason for article "Uppcon" deletion. Failure to comply will result in recreation of article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.76.87.120 (talk) 10:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

A page you created, Simon the Unicorn, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. LeilaniLad (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

== Wow, I figured Simon would get more than 10 minutes :D ==

It's just not Wikipedia without Simon the Unicorn. Imagine the horror if we deleted one pokemon article :D -- Tawker (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am certainly not one that needs convincing that there are far too many non-notable subjects with articles on Wikipedia, but I can only handle what comes across my "desk" as it were. LeilaniLad (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A deleting admin has refused several requests to userfy some deleted articles. The articles were discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William McCracken and I would like them userfied to user:Paulmcdonald/articlename -- you can see a reference to some of the progress made on improving these articles at User:Paulmcdonald/deletedcoach and an essay about the importance to userfy them at WP:CFBWEST. Thank you for your attention.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noted that you semi-protected the featured article of the day, until midnight tomorrow. Considering that an edit spree like this is probably some crazy 4chan idea, wouldn't it be better to have only semi-protected for an hour or so, tops? Do you think that you could drop the protection?

I'll be offline for a while now, but please think it over. Thanks :) NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tawker. You have new messages at NuclearWarfare's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Ball, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Elizabeth Ball seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Elizabeth Ball, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just re-created this redirect to North American Water and Power Alliance and can't see the whole of your reason for deleting it previously, which to me makes no sense as this is one of the various acronyms for this idea/project/whatchamacallit; [[NAWPA[[ and NAWAPTA being two others....what was your reason?Skookum1 (talk) 14:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks; I'm not sure if the current North American Water and Power Alliance article content is copyvio or not; I adjusted some wording and added refs as there was an "unreferenced" tag on it....most online stuff seems to have to do with one Lyndon H. LaRouche and I hadn't actually known he was a promoter of it; I associate it with Simon Reisman on this side of the border; there's a similar plan for diverting waters flowing into Hudson/James Bay into the Great Lakes....a climactic disaster waiting to happen in my estimation; I'm not sure what it's called....there should be a Category:Proposed diversion projects or Category:Proposed hydroelectric projects to put on it/them, but I'll take that up at WP:WikiProject Energy and wherever else...thanks for the explanation anyway; not a series of articles I'm interested in spendign time on, I'm more a history and general geography guy but it was linked off an article i was workign on, i.e. as NAWPA but as I found out when typing/linking NAWAPA article you'd previously deleted it etc; apparently it was just an article-title before; it never shoudl have been an acronym as there's at least three acronyms for this project that I know of....Skookum1 (talk) 18:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an oldie but goodie. I am entirely unfamiliar with the case, but you were the blocking admin, so I thought I would let you check it out... See User talk:66.170.10.34 --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you were listed in the Coaches for reconfirmation section of the admin coaching status page. Could you please update your status, and if you are still interested, drop me a note on my talk page? Thanks, Genius101^Guestbook 22:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC) This message was delivered semi-automatically by AutoWikiBrowser.[reply]

Greetings, I'm just trying to get a current feel for who is still active in the project and if anybody would object to cleaning out inactive users of the verified user list. Thank you for your time. Q ^{T C} 03:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was notified that you was the one who deleted our company page about Greenbyte. Could you please clarify why you did this so we can fix whatever was wrong and put it back up? /Fredrik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredrik84larsson (talk • contribs) 07:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted for notability concerns, please take a look at Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Commercial_organizations . In addition, the article had no links to references, especially to ones that Wikipedia considers to be Reliable sources which help indicate notability/providing independent verification of facts. Furthermore, if you are associated with / paid to edit the article, Wikipedia generally frowns upon writing about yourself, if you're paid to edit the article (as part of your work duties) it's considered taboo. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Autobiography for the correct procedure to use for when you have an article you have a potential conflict of interest in. I hope that helps - -Tawker (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We have references to some companies that wrote about our product. You delete the page as "Advertisement", but we had those references to companies that really use our software and write about it on the web-sites and blogs. How we can prove that we are not advertising our product?

kind regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:230:0:0:E4AB:71BF:6746:1A8B (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Template talk:EnPW. I see that a dozen or more pages had that acknowledgment removed "per Danny". A violation of license, on the face of it. Robin Patterson 18 Feb 2007

I assume you are the one who deleted the article on Master Nan. I can't understand why you did that as the sources were cited and corrections were made to avoid copyright infringement. Moreover, at the time the only tag on the article was for the article to be cleaned up. All I did was try to reiterate some facts on a famous buddhist scholar and all the work put into it has been deleted in a flash and without warning. I cannot claim to be tech savvy enough to know whether you are directly responsible, but if so, it makes unfamiliar and new contributors like myself have a strong sense of distaste that there is not even the chance for correction. What's the point of trying to establish an article if it keeps on getting deleted before it's done. If you could please give specific reasons why it was deleted as the article was rewritten to avoid copyright infringement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Studydoc (talk • contribs) 14:18, Mar 14, 2007 (UTC).

Why deleted? regards densbtly

Hi,

I noticed you apparently deleted the "Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency" (MIGA). How come? Is there a copyright infringement (I'm guessing that's what "copyvio" means)?

I should point out I work for MIGA.

Thanks, Michael Durr [email protected] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mikedurr (talk • contribs) 14:08, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

Mercury has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jeff Macpherson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Jeff Macpherson.

The Helpful One is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

The article B. C. Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to be curt, but can you please be careful when you add items to ITN. There was a grammar mistake, no bolded item, the incorrect date, and an obviously unnecessary acronym in the Winter Olympics item. -- tariqabjotu 03:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I removed, and you may see my explanation here. Also, please check at WP:ITN/C bedore placing items in the future. Happy editing, and if you have any other ITN questions, feel free to ask. Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 03:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking through the coaches at Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Status and saw that there are a lot under "reconfirmation".

Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)

If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When you put "user..." as USERNAME's block reason, what does "user..." actually mean? Keyboard mouse (talk) 02:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Gay Nigger Association of America. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. riffic (talk) 14:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I case you were not yet aware, it seems the domain name expired User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Wikipedia:WikipediaWeekly. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 23:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for alerting me to the use of my picture! It certainly is gratifying to have my work re-used. I was driving to my planned Wiki subject when my car was stopped by the flagger. I intuitively thought this might be interesting, if not useful, particularly because of the stoic stance of the flagger. Thanks again. Dwight Burdette (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted the Exsite Webware (software) as soon as we took it out of the sandbox. I've been answering the notability concerns but you're deleting faster than I can type. Can you restore Exsite Webware (software) so that the notability section can reappear? Also the logos and graphics were being verified while you were speedy deleting. I thought I'd have more than 1/2 hour to answer your questions, but it seems not so. Please restore the article so that all the pieces can come together. Thanks. Santamoly (talk) 03:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I didn't know about the "keepon" tag. Haven't learned that yet :-) Santamoly (talk) 03:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mark Donnelly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable as a singer or actor.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Larkspurs (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Donnelly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Donnelly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Larkspurs (talk) 22:13, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was no justification for you to have speedy deleted this file. It was a perfect svg representation (not "older" as you claim) of the Scouts Canada emblem. Nothing was significantly different from the smaller, lower quality logo being foisted now. Please restore it, and consider the Scouting WPMOS, which is aiming toward svgification of all Scout national emblems. Again, a discussion was warranted before you did this unilateral move. The emblem _was_ in use. Please restore.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:22, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page w/ explanations and relevant policy -- Tawker (talk) 03:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tawker,

I understand you have deleted the Handheld Culture page for promotional/advertising reason. I will create another one with proper citation and edited content. Please kindly review. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninisuet (talk • contribs) 16:03, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, please be reminded to write in a Neutral Point of View and cite your sources. Usually the company's website isn't the best source for a lot of stuff -- Tawker (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tawker, I saw you deleted the above page, I assume because of the nomination for Speedy Deletion. As I do agree that the content of the page could be interpreted as advertising (although there were for sure some 'negative' remarks on it and it only contained information what they are doing: nothing in that they are 'the best' or whatever) I still do think that they are notable and a page on that company should be possible on Wiki. Although I did say on the Talk page of that article why I think they are notable (and if they are not then I can find many other ISP's that are having a page on Wiki that can be deleted). Is it possible to give me feedback on the things I brought up on the Talk page (in regards to why I think that this company is notable). Even if you didn't read it before deletion: as Wiki admin/mod you have access to deleted content; so you can read it. Your feedback will be much appreciated.

A long story about my link between I3d and me, myself and I: This is however not important for I3D being notable or not, its just given as background info:

As said: I'm not having any interest in that company and I'm also not involved in any gaming community: so even from that end I'm not interested in any advertising for this company. I was via my work involved at one moment in time: this company has chosed to use the (imho very low-end) PCT55xx series layer 2 switches and these switches had the 'feature' that after 49.7 days uptime (just do the maths and see when a 32 bit counter in miliseconds reaches the end and does a roll-over to 0 again) this switch lost his entire MAC address table and didn't relearn. This cause huge delays in traffic and because this was still not solved when the Battlefield 3 launch data was approaching customer got nervous. The vendor of these switches (=Marvel) and also Dell became a bit nervous (not for this customer, but in general: the only thing people knew so far was that the switch could loose its MAC address table but Dell nor vendor were able to reproduce the issue. As I was involved in several service requests from customers (and I3D was one of them) and also involved in the vendor escalation I had a great interest. During a weekend when I was once again analusing data I did see that an uptime of aprox 50 days could be an issue and then did the maths: how dows 49 - 50 days uptime look in binary form. Once I found out that there was a roll-over possible on a 32 bit milisecond timer the software guys in Tel Aviv were able to fix the issue in 1 day (and this case had been escalaated to them some 2 months earlier).

Looking forward to your reply, cheers, Tonkie (talk) 00:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the article again, it does appear that it also failed WP:V verifiability - pretty much every reference was to company resources and pages. If you could provide some more reliable sources I'd be more than happy to restore page -- Tawker (talk) 00:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reply. I admit that the references were nearly all the guys themselved. Often when I do initiate an article I do get started with a very select number of sources and once published I do try to find other -external/neutral- references to replace refs from the subject themselves. Hoewever: if the article is tagged for Speedy Deletion after 6 minutes after first placing I didn't want to invest any effort in it before it was either deleted or that the SD Request wasn't accepted. I'll have a look at it myself and if I do find enough external -reliable- resources I'll consider a re-writel. Thanks again for quick reply. Tonkie (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Tawker a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 22:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you record the pronunciation of the word "garage" in the audio please ? Fête (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard "haskatchewan" in the file Media:En-ca-Saskatchewan.ogg. Fête (talk) 00:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amqui (talk) 00:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Scouts Canada.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scouts Canada Camps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silver Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PhoneFactor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhoneFactor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 07:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've repeatedly undone edits as to the constitution of the provincial/regional Councils yet you do not offer even a hint at how the Councils are appointed and leave it unexplained. You claim the BoG/CC does not appoint ANY members of the Councils ... and then to contradict yourself you say BUT. I suggest it is your BUT plus, not only the majority, BUT all Council members that are directly appointed or like the Council Commissioner are ex-officio members by their appointment to other office by the BoG/CC. Please add your explanation of how the members of the Councils are appointed.101.171.42.149 (talk) 01:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether if Stu Klitenic should be deleted or not. The conversation will be held at the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stu Klitenic until a consensus is held and everyone is welcome to join the conversation. However, do not remove the AfD message on the top of the page. Ashbeckjonathan 03:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:West Vancouver NASA World Wind Community Landsat 7.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tawker,
the PGP-key you provide on your user-page was revoked. Could you please add a new one? Also it would be great if you could send me your new key-ID by wiki-mail or leave it on my talk-page. Thanks :-). --DaB. (talk) 21:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scouting and Guiding in British Columbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SCUBA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tawker,

This is just to let you know that I created a new version of the Kernel adaptive filter article you just deep-sixed. It doesn't have any of the original prose in it and it is written in my own words, so should have none of the copyvio problems in the previous version. --Mark viking (talk) 04:36, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, thanks for creating it! It sounds like it's very much a valid topic, we just can't have copyvio issues on the site :) -- Tawker (talk) 04:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for declining the CSD and taking Skweez Media to Afd for discussion. As an admin, can you please, check the Baci Lingerie page also which is tagged with multiple CSD criteria as I do not believe a company which has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources can be eligible for a speedy deletion. I have already contacted the admin[2] who previously deleted it and then re-created with more neutral tone by removing the promotional text pointed out by the admin[3]. Thanks.--Talpatra (talk) 18:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for asking about the page which I think needs notability review. I really appreciate any and all help you can give. On your Google searches of the subject, please be sure to search his name and town of residence as given in the article using a plus sign in between the name and the town. He has very few online references, the name+place search will bring up the only other local reference I've found on the man. The North Coast Journal story as a reference only references that he was in the NYT, nothing new, and the other refs on the page are to RV blogs and product reviews. I don't see notability here, but I have tried to have it deleted and failed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tawker. I'm not sure if you saw it, but there was a recent consensus at AfD to keep this article. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Roxxi. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:02, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't see it, so restored and tagged for cleanup, thanks for the heads up -- Tawker (talk) 17:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I understand that you removed the page off ZVL Leiden? May I ask what the reason was for this? ZVL is a sportsteam, competing in the dutch and European competitions, with several national players. They won 3 times in a row the national cup, 2 times the supercup and ended in the final four of the eurocup, to name a few. As I see other waterpolo clubs on wiki as wel (including dutch teams) I wondered what was the reason not to acceprt a page on ZVL. Also because they are also mentioned on other pages. Grasyerba (talk) 07:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was requested for speedy deletion due to notability concerns. On the article itself there were no links to reliable third party sources indicating the relevance and notability of the club. If you've got reliable sources / more documentation for the article I'm more than happy to restore so it can be improved :) -- Tawker (talk) 17:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, ZVL Waterpolo has a website and FB page (both in dutch) and is mentioned on the LEN page (European federation)as competitors in the LEN and Euro league. Also there are several directions on wiki itself to ZVL, for instance with the international players Biurakh Hakhverdian and Iefke van Belkum as wel as on the page with LEN competitors (that is why I originally initiated the page, so there would be more background on that. How can I make clearer that this page is not commercial but only to provide extra information on european and dutch waterpolo? Grasyerba (talk) 07:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tawker, Please explain deleting the short article, including at least six references, on conservative anti-union consultant Peter List. Please provide a copy of my submission that was deleted. Thank you```` YrreTTerry.

Tawker, Please explain deleting the short article, including at least six references, on conservative anti-union consultant Peter List. Please provide a copy of my submission that was deleted. Thank you```` YrreTTerry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YrreTTerry (talk • contribs) 22:44, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I or the speedy delete requester could tell, the references did not establish notability of the subject and many were at best, one line mentions of the subject, not detailed biographical information. It's not the number of references, it's the content of the references that is key. If you wish, I can restore the article and put it to Articles for Deletion, although I suspect the end result will be the same -- Tawker (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, are you sure you meant speedy delete when you closed this? Seems a little out of procedure, especially with no CSD cited. ansh666 19:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given the lack of discussion and the fact that the article could fit A7 or G11 on CSD it didn't make sense to close as no consensus or relist, likely with no activity again.) With that being said, I have no problems restoring and putting up for relist if you so desire -- Tawker (talk) 19:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, no, I was the nominator, so I don't have a problem with it; I'd just suggest writing out the actual CSD in the closing result next time so that others won't complain. (And, as far as I can tell, AfDs with no participation like that are closed as uncontested PROD-like deletes mostly.) Thanks, ansh666 19:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about the criticism, it is not personal. Another admin was put through the ringer over premature posts recently. Had there been at least four supports and no objections and no article issues no one would have objected. I think I am the only oppose, so assuming there's still no issue with the article itself no one will complain if it is posted after a decent interval. μηδείς (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, it's Wikipedia's front page, the holy grail, people will put people thru the ringer over just about anything, I didn't take it personally. It's somewhat funny how rules based we've become over the "if it makes sense do it" that existed when I started here. Heck, you should have seen the opposition I got back in the day for starting the idea of having a bot handle vandalism reverts. ITN wise I've seen highly highly experienced admins get a ringer for posting major major news with a substantial length article because it "was too soon." - so it can happen to just about anyone. Now, I'm not foolish enough to undo my undo, could you imagine the s**tstorm that would stir up (even if ultimately the rationale is completely valid/sound.) Feel free to undo my undo if you think it's warranted.

It does raise an interesting point though, is it really more relevant after waiting 12 hours than after waiting 4 or 5? Just an interesting observation, as all actions are easily reversible, and if there turns out there's a late change in consensus, it's easy enough to revert -- Tawker (talk) 00:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please create the page Thomson Geer for me. See all verifiable references and language I need replicated from Thomson geer. For some reason you have blocked and deleted the content despite it being similar in tone and language to every other law firms page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Australianeditor (talk • contribs) 06:49, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• -- The above user recreated the page using lowercase G Thomson geer I advised that whilst I will leave it for now I cannot guarantee another will add a speedy deletion notice.

--KaraokeMac (talk) 07:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has been moved/recreated. Please be advised it was deleted for notability concerns and may not survive the articles for deletion process. -- Tawker (talk) 00:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I cited plenty of things in my article, if people would actually take the time to read every website I cited, people would get the bigger picture that I was telling the truth about the person I was writing about. I put lots of hours into writing that article, spent a whole night with no sleep. LitaRodi is a real Christian Rapper, and he is an evangelist in terms of doing positive rap in schools to tell people about his life story and what Jesus did for him. I would like your help, please, in restoring my page so the world can see who LitaRodi is, he isn't a nobody, he is noteworthy and notable enough as a person to have a Wikipedia written about him, if Trae Tha Truth can have a Wikipedia then LitaRodi should have one too! --Bmnolen (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted based on the discussion at AfD. I cannot speak to the notability of Trae Tha Truth as a comparable as it has not been nominated for deletion nor have I reviewed the page. With that being said, my closure reflects no judgement on the individual himself but rather addressees the question of Notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. With that being said, I have restored the article to your userspace at User:Bmnolen/Litarodi - please feel free to source additional material to indicate notability either as a musician or as an evangelist as per Wikipedia's policies. -- Tawker (talk) 00:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvel Disk Wars: The Avengers

Hardly a consensus with only 4 editor involved in the discussion. I have seen 6 to 2 votes not considered consensus do to lack of participation. Rammin wanted to go on its merit of what was there. The keep argument was based on the inability of any one to tell if the Japanese source were significant.

1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Man: Rise of Technovore (2nd nomination)

User talk:Mystipedian closed this discussion when there was no consensus either and more so than Disk Wars. The original position of it being a section (subarticle) at Marvel Anime should be the result as it was the original position before the argument. Which should be the case or a relisting. I don't know why Mystipedian thinks when he has been registered on WP for only 3 days that qualified him to close AfDs. Spshu (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given the low participation in AfD these days, 4 editors in a discussion isn't too bad actually. I could have closed it no consensus or keep, both in effect have the same end result. I do note that the close was intended to be without prejudice, if upon further review there is information to suggest notability has not been established. As for new users closing AfD's, I would suggest it may be a little odd (most new users would have no idea about AfD let alone how to close one) and there may be something in play, but I would recommend we WP:AGF on the matter. -- Tawker (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my page of 'my Jolly Sailor Bold' ? I had just started it when I got a message that it was deleted! Can you PLEASE explain your reasonings? Also, please keep in mind that I'm a beginner and maybe it was a little bit too harsh to delete my page, without first telling me AND to give me advice! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IBCPirates (talk • contribs) 19:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone had tagged it for speedy deletion as the article consisted of one word, 'My' so I think they (and I) thought it was an accidental post. I restored the article to your userspace (basically your own set of pages) at User:IBCPirates/My Jolly Sailor Bold where you can work on it without risk of someone deleting it -- Tawker (talk) 19:18, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry if I got a little, you know, mad. heehee....now I can see why you thought it was an accidental post! I would've, too. Thanks for putting it back up. --IBCPirates (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates--IBCPirates (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tawker. Since it looks like you're pretty nice person, could I have some advice on Wikipedia from you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IBCPirates (talk • contribs) 20:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - what can I do to help? -- Tawker (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Um.... just answer this question.....HOW DO YOU UPLOAD IMAGES??????? IBCPirates (talk) 23:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPiratesIBCPirates (talk) 23:51, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard - just be careful with the images to ensure they are either free to use (as in license wise free) or a fair use rationale has been produced for the image. The wizard should walk you thru the steps. -- Tawker (talk) 23:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay....thank you. Hey, like, no offense or anything, but you kinda mispelled thru, as if would be 'through' in this case. --IBCPirates (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates[reply]

I need more coffee :) -- Tawker (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, XD. Hey, I know this is off topic, but do you like Johnny Depp? --IBCPirates (talk) 00:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates[reply]

Whats up! You know how I was working on My Jolly Sailor Bold? Well, I need help. Is it allowed to write lyrics in a page? Because the lyrics go like this.......

Upon one summer's morning I carefully did stray Down by the walls of wapping Where I met a sailor gay

Conversing with a young lass Who seemed to be in pain, Saying, William, when you go, I fear you'll never return again

My heart is pierced by Cupid I disdain all glittering gold, there is nothing can console me But my jolly sailor bold

His hair it hangs in ringlets His eyes as black as coal My happiness attends him Wherever he may go

From Tower Hill to Blackwall I'll wander, weep and moan All for my jolly sailor Until he sails home

My heart is pierced by Cupid I disdain all glittering gold There is nothing can console me But my jolly sailor bold

My father is a merchant The truth I now will tell And In great London City In opulence doth dwell

His fortune doth exceed 300,000 gold And he frowns upon his daughter Who loves a sailor bold

A fig for his riches His merchandise and gold True love has grafted my heart Give me my sailor bold

My heart is pierced by Cupid I disdain all glittering gold There is nothing can console me But my jolly sailor bold

Should he return in pov'rty For o'er the ocean far To my tender bosom I'll press my jolly tar

My sailor is as smiling As the pleasant month of May and often we have wandered Through Ratcliffe Highway

Many a pretty blooming Young girl did we behold Recling on the bosom Of her jolly sailor bold

My heart is pierced by Cupid I disdain all glittering gold There is nothing can console me But my jolly sailor bold

My name it is Anabel A merchant's daughter fair And I have left my parents And 3,000 pounds a year

Come all you pretty fair maids Whoever you may be Who love a jolly sailor That plows the raging sea

While up aloft in storm From me his absence mourn And firmly pray arrive the day He's never more to roam

My heart is pierced by Cupid I disdain all glittering gold There is nothing can console me But my jolly sailor bold

My heart is pierced by Cupid I disdain all glittering gold There is nothing can console me But my jolly sailor bold — Preceding unsigned comment added by IBCPirates (talk • contribs) 23:49, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly not, the main concern is copyright - putting the full lyrics of the song on an article would likely be considered infringement -- Tawker (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Point. But it's a really nice song. It's about a woman and a man who love each other but the woman's dad wont let them marry and they secretly love each other, and in the end, the man dies while out at sea. --IBCPirates (talk) 00:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates[reply]

IBCPirates stands for IcyBlackHandofdeathClub. It sounded piratey, so I added 'pirates' at the end, Just in case you were wondering. Nice speaking with you. <3 --IBCPirates (talk) 00:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates[reply]

Hi, Tawker. Remember how you almost deleted my page, 'My Jolly Sailor Bold'? Well, I've been working on it and since you're really good at deleting things, I wanted to see if you think it is worth being submitted. IBCPirates (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates[reply]

It's a good start but I'd really look at reliable sources as well as your first article guide. Right now I'd suspect another user would tag it for deletion citing notability and the citation concerns. Take a look at that guide, it should help quite a bit -- Tawker (talk) 02:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But how do I get good sources? They really aren't that many reliable sources unless you count Amazon, the official website and youtube. So how would I get reliable sources? IBCPirates (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2014 (UTC)IBCPirates[reply]

There lies a problem. It may cause other editors to suggest the song by itself is not notable - as external sources is one of the criteria people use to evaluate articles. Try hunting around a bit more, sometimes some searches help! -- Tawker (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks.Do you have any ideas where I could start my hunting? -talk (IBCPirates)❤T☮C☺IBC☺ — Preceding undated comment added 21:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping I could get you to change your mind regarding the speedy deletion of this article. WP:NFOOTY requires that a player not only be signed to but play (i.e. in an actual game) for a fully pro club. Additionally, Ford had already signed for the Sounders two years ago when the last afd took place, so his signing there was taken into consideration. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick search and it looked like he played a few games in the MLS Reserve league which as I understand it, is a fully professional league being integrated with USL Pro which NFOOTY recognizes as a fully pro league. I'm just a little loathe to speedy an article where it appears a case could be made for inclusion within guidelines. It does look like some of those games occurred since the last AfD... -- Tawker (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account of mine is mainly retired and I rarely log in anymore. I saw your note on my talk page about the pending speedy deletion of IMP Group much too late to object. Why was it deleted? It is one of the more longstanding, prominent companies headquartered in the Halifax Regional Municipality.

I have only a vague recollection of the contents of the page, but I believe I wrote only a simple description of their business activities, as well as mention of the 2004 nationally publicized incident when their hotel property in Moscow was illegally seized. I don't think the article had a promotional tone – at least, it didn't the last time I saw it. I am not affiliated with the company in any way and had no reason to advertise it.

Genuinely confused. I don't believe the article met either criteria for speedy deletion that you specified. Sprocket (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was tagged by someone else for notability concerns, if you take a look at WP:CORP it has some more info on notability for corporate entities. I was just the one who "pushed the button" - if you'd like I can restore to draft namespace or your userspace to expand/review the article to see if it can meet notability criteria -- Tawker (talk) 15:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for closing the above discussion, and for recording this on the article's talk page. For some reason the information box you have posted there links not to the recent discussion, but to an earlier deletion debate from 2006. Is there any way to correct this, please? RomanSpa (talk) 06:44, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed - I forgot to update my talk page -- Tawker (talk) 16:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion copied from here: Hi, you recently deleted my Cal South article because there weren't any primary sources. I don't know how to undelete an article. Could you please do it for me so I can add sources? If they don't fall under Wikipedia guidelines, then you can feel free to delete the article. Also, I will make sure to note the significance of the article. Thanks.--Bowser2500 (talk) 07:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restord to User:Bowser2500/Cal South - please feel free to edit there and move to the article space once completed. Please pay special attention to the notability criteria as right now notability hasn't been indicated. Cheers! -- Tawker (talk) 16:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Bowser2500 (talk) 18:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you justify your close of this AFD - admins should not be IARing in AFD closes, and should not be allowing CRYSTALBALLery either. Furthermore I don't see how 5 editors (6 if you include the nominator) stating that GNG is not met, and 2 who say it is met (but unable to properly verify their claims), is a "no consensus" result... GiantSnowman 09:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking, I'd be happy to. First of all, I wouldn't consider it a IAR close. AfD is not a vote, it's a consensus reaching discussion. A no consensus (resulting in a keep of the article) is radically different than a keep close. The individuals suggesting deletion for the most part agreed the subject failed NFOOTY by not playing in a fully professional league. Those advocating keep are suggesting there was considerable media coverage (with some links in foreign languages that I was able to keyword scan/machine translate on) Given the apparently valid viewpoints of both sides I reached a no consensus determination. As a no consensus decision it bears no prejudice for future AfD discussions and appeared to be the only logical choice. My comment regarding CRYSTALBALL is somewhat coincidental, to me, the AfD stood on a no consensus regardless of what may happen in the future. The only options would be to relist or close as a no consensus. I hope this helps -- Tawker (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Would you be willing to re-open and re-list? GiantSnowman 08:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would be, however I'd recommend giving it a couple weeks. Back to back AfD's tend to result in lower discussion / discussion apathy. -- Tawker (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll ping you in a few weeks then. GiantSnowman 17:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) GiantSnowman 15:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Though you deleted the article, by basically ignoring my comments that it had enough sources to comply with GNG... I'm asking you to userfy this article so that I can later work on it, if there's anything that it needs to improve... Thanks. Küñall (talk) 05:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied to User:Küñall/Cheer_C.P.S. - I definitely didn't ignore your comments when determining consensus. Remember, consensus is consensus, it's not necessarily votes nor is it any one argument trumping all. What I did is I looked at all of the discussion and the balance of comments and considered the arguments, the general consensus was that high school sports teams, regardless of location did not meet notability criteria. -- Tawker (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was about to create a page for The Kinks song, Live Life, when it said that a page with the same name was deleted by you. I was wondering whether it would be alright for me to create said article. Also, the article was seleted under qualification A7, which "applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." If we are talking about the same "Live Life", it does not list under A7. — Thanks, Beatleswhobeachboys (talk • contribs) 20:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the one I deleted was for a different band/different song with the same title. -- Tawker (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for responding! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatleswhobeachboys (talk • contribs) 20:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are listed at Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles and since I don't want to inundate the people whose names start with the letter a, I have jumped to the Ts (given my username). I have made a request at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive262#Userfication of deleted and salted content. The article has been deleted through AFD twice and the first time was upheld at DRV. The first version was 49KB readable prose, while the second version was 33KB readable prose. Although many have argued the second was a recreation of the first, two separate admins reversed their own WP:G4 deletions upon further review. It seems that a third admin speedily declined another G4 although I am unable to see the history right now and did not notice this during the second AFD. I have a long history at successful recreations (12 articles now at WP:GA are formerly deleted articles that I have recreated, including "Cat Daddy" which was deleted 4 previous times). The second AFD seems to be an indictment against any future recreation of the article, which is befuddling to me. I would like to learn something from this seemingly odd result. I have requested a userfication that includes history and talk page so that I can investigate policy/guidelines. So far the best userfication offer was by Floquenbeam to restore it for a fixed 2 week expiry. I have stated that 2 months would be more appropriate than 2 weeks because no policy discussion can be guaranteed to conclude within 2 weeks and I have several that I would like to pursue. Floquenbeam, has stated his hesitance is based on assumptions of bad faith regarding my intentions and that I have made a phantom "refusal to agree not to bug people about tagging or edits they made to the article prior to deletion" which I never made (I was actually concerned about the 2 week expiry and forgot to assent to the request). I am unable to discuss things with Floquenbeam who has not edited in 3 days (since 20:43, 28 May 2014). As a frequent recreator of content, I would like a chance to become a better editor by examining the various policies related to this outcome with the content available for illustration and instruction.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, Tony has forum-shopped this request at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2014_May_6 and then Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Userfication_of_deleted_and_salted_content where he received answers he disliked. He has since requested on 9 different admin talk pages, including: User_talk:TParis, User_talk:Thingg, User_talk:Titoxd, User_talk:Thespian, User talk:Tawker, User talk:The Placebo Effect, User talk:Thehelpfulone, User_talk:Toon05, & finally User_talk:ThaddeusB who restored the article on request to User:TonyTheTiger/Jabari Parker's high school career. I apologize for spamming this message, but since Tony has failed to let you know that he has forum-shopped to successfully get the outcome he wanted, I felt you all deserved to know that you do not need to respond to his request. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 16:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tawker, I would appreciate your review of these notes in response to Wiki committee's concerns re: Mary Elise Hayden's page (created in 2007). Thank you, Page Originator

RE: NACTOR

Although American, Mary Elise Hayden played Kate's sister Pippa Middleton in WILLIAM AND KATE, which aired on Lifetime. Whether or not it is "an underwhelming TV movie," as a reviewer suggested, it remains that Hayden played a noteworthy figure. When the movie aired, Hayden's Wiki page received over 100,000 hits April-June 2011 as people were interested in finding out about the actress who played Pippa. (Please see traffic stats from that period. The page continued to receive hits from interested searchers until its removal.)

Hayden has had 2 film leads in two award-winning features. Moreover, her specific lead performance in WE ARE THE MODS was lauded in Hollywood's premier entertainment magazine VARIETY by film critic Peter Debruge as well as in FILMMAKER MAGAZINE, THE EDGE/Boston, THE PHILLY CITY PAPER, among others.

Hayden has had 2 recurring roles in prominent shows on ABC (10 THINGS I HATE ABOUT YOU and RAVENSWOOD).

Hayden guest-starred on A&E's LONGMIRE last night, June 9, 2014.

Hayden has appeared in over 40 music videos, many of these leads for major musicians, has had lead and supporting roles in many shorts, both experimental and traditional, along with other TV shows/films and live performances.

Of the 6 million people listed on IMDB, Mary Elise Hayden is ranked among the top .0025 (1/4%).

RE: Documentation As I can no longer see the listing, it is difficult to determine which citations are problematic. Insufficient ones could be updated.

RE: PR In essence, biographical articles on any online site could be considered PR by their very nature as those searching learn about individuals and their achievements. This listing is no different re: potential PR than any other. If something is offensive, however, I would be happy to remove it.

RE: Page Creation Page originators of living actor pages not created by Wiki editors are often written by management or public relations sources (possibly even by the actor himself or herself when that was permitted) as they are most familiar with the actor's history. Wikipedia's call for content creation at its inception inspired the original page, not PR. It was not created until there was something noteworthy to include in the article. Since that time, as the talent continued to garner critical and public recognition, facts about the subject were added as indicated above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fltola (talk • contribs) 21:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Saleem Technologies. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

@NawlinWiki, Nick-D, and Lankiveil: as you participated in the deletion discussion, you may be interested as well.

@Mdann52, Itsalleasy, and Ireneshih: as you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saleem (Company), which resulted in the current draft being moved out of the main encyclopedia, you may be interested as well.

@Rahfatsalman, MurtazaHus, OccultZone, and Safiel: as you have edited the current draft either before or after it was moved to its current location, you may be interested as well. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• At least for now, there is probably no need to create a page about it. You know that there are only 2,000 results. Facebook, twitter have dominated most of it. Notability has not been established. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you deleted the Institute of Refrigeration page on 19 April - I found this out on 25 April when looking for some information and immediately contacted "Launchballer" who had flagged the article for deletion. Launchballer has confirmed to me that this is because he thought that the page was a repeat of the page for the International Institute of Refrigeration, which is not the case. He also suggested that the page was an advertisement, in contravention of the rules for content (G11) with the comment "what makes it notable?"

The Institute of Refrigeration is not the same as the International Institute (which is an intergovernmental body headquartered in Paris). It is a learned society and is the oldest refrigeration institute in the world, founded in 1899. It is internationally recognised as a thought-leader in refrigeration technology and has members all over the world. It is a registered charity operating on a not-for-profit basis. If this constitutes grounds for deletion then I suggest that other pagers (for example the Wikimedia Foundation or the Institution of Mechanical Engineers) should also be deleted.

Please reinstate the page - it does not contravene any of Wikipedia's guidelines. It is notable and it is not an advertisement.

Dr Fridge (talk) 22:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I most certainly did not say that! I asked if it was the same thing, because I wasn't sure. I had already AfDd it at that point because I couldn't see why it was notable. However, if only one person comments on a AfD, then it should really be closed as no consensus. Thus, could you restore it so I can get a wider hearing on it?--Launchballer 23:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have put up a new version of Peter Deunov, which was deleted during April. As I said in my comment, there are not many reliable sources in English, but the initial motivation for the delete seems to me unjustified, because (a) Peter Deunov didn't create a "sect of Steinerism" and (b) he really was a notable Bulgarian figure, and so definitely deserves a Wikipedia page. However, I agree the previous version of the article was very poor, and this new version tries to be proportional to the references. I would be happy to discuss the article if you wish, but I don't think it warrants a delete anymore. Quartz (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just noticed the Wikipedia page for a Non-profit charity I work for, 1-800-Charity Cars, was deleted. Can you tell me why the page was deleted and what can be done to have it reinstated? I was not the person who created the page initially. I can provide links to other references. 71.42.57.9 (talk) 16:10, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The page was deleted for notability concerns after an articles for deletion nomination process. If additional references and sources can be found to indicate notability you may want to put the article on articles for creation as you have stated, being your employer you have an inherit conflict of interest with editing the article. I hope that helps, sorry for the slow response, I've been away for a while -- Tawker (talk) 19:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I can provide links that will make an article on Aquapod (bottle) notable. Before going through the deletion review, it said to contact the administrator who deleted the article. SNS (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

mintcoin is alive and controlled by the general public thru Trello and other public community tools. The coin has recently run a campaign with Keepod to help bring personal computing to low income children. Additionally it trades on over 8 exchanges and around the world. I ask that you allow this page to be opened back up so I can update it. I can provide references to the mentioned Trello, Keepod, and 8 exchanges if needed. Additionally I can provide better sources. I would like to see proper documentation on many cryptocurrencies on Wikipedia. Thanks. Tawker FLOat1NGP01NT0O1 (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have User:Tawker/protectlist cascade protected, but it's currently completely non-functional, since it doesn't transclude anything. Can you remove cascade protection from that page, and if you did want those titles to be protected, then salt them as normal? Thanks, Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect BeaconGate. Since you had some involvement with the BeaconGate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can I revive this deleted article? Mr. Arena is now the CEO of Foodshare. (see http://www.courant.com/hartford-magazine/features/hc-hm-james-arena-derosa-foodshare-20151201-story.html). Stagophile (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tawker!

Hello Tawker, Snoupy147 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Following your message, I would like to contest the speedy deletion of the page "Ledger Investing". (I could add more source and change the wording/verbiage in order to clarify the company description). However the page do not have such button. Please could you give me more information regarding how to proceed to recover the page? I am totally open to rewriting it differently. Thanks a bunch! Snoupy147 (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Hey there, I filed a report about an IP vandal whose edits look like they go back at least to 2014 mutilating cites and also adding them in. I only first caught them when they started updating ancient cites to DOI format. I honestly have no idea what to do with the information I found, can you help or direct me to someone who can? Ogress 03:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tawker. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tawker.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tawker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, April 2017

Greetings! The BAG Newsletter is now the Bots Newsletter, per discussion. As such, we've subscribed all bot operators to the newsletter. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: Arbcom Magioladitis ARBCOM case has closed. The remedies of the case include: Community encouraged to review common fixes Community encouraged to review policy on cosmetic edits Developers encouraged to improve AWB interface Bot approvals group encouraged to carefully review BRFA scope Reminders/Restrictions specific to Magioladitis BRFAs We currently have 27 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing! Discussions There are multiple ongoing discussions surrounding bot-related matters. In particular: RFC on COSMETICBOT Efforts at WP:CHECKWIKI to identify cosmetic fixes Requested move for the Bot Owners' Noticeboard A phabricator ticket T162685 has been made to have a "bots" tag, so issues related to bot frameworks can be tracked New things Several new things are around: A BAG Guide has been created (WP:BAGG, discussion). Users now have the option to hide AWB from their watchlists via a script (WP:HIDEAWB, discussion) The guidance on how to deal with bot issues has been overhauled (WP:BOTISSUE, discussion) The bot policy has been updated to clarify that bot operators are required to register accounts. (WP:BOTACCOUNT, discussion) Wikimania Wikimania 2017 is happening in Montreal, during 9–13 August. If you plan to attend, or give a talk, let us know! Thank you! edited by:Headbomb 11:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply] (You can unsubscribe from future newsletters by removing your name from this list.)

Bots Newsletter, July 2017

Greetings! Here is the 4th issue of the Bots Newsletter (formerly the BAG Newletter). You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: BAG BU Rob13 and Cyberpower678 are now members of the BAG (see RfBAG/BU Rob13 and RfBAG/Cyberpower678 3). BU Rob13 and Cyberpower678 are both administrators; the former operates BU RoBOT which does a plethora of tasks, while the latter operates Cyberbot I (which replaces old bots), Cyberbot II (which does many different things), and InternetArchiveBot which combats link rot. Welcome to the BAG! BRFAs We currently have 12 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing! Discussions Efforts at WP:CHECKWIKI to identify cosmetic fixes are still ongoing. The RFC on COSMETICBOT has concluded with "a clear consensus exists to adopt the proposed language". The new wording is now live. The venue for bot appeals and reexaminations has been changed from WP:BRFA to WP:BOTN (see discussion) The Wikipedia:Bot owner's noticeboard is now the Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard (see discussion). New things A historical correction was made to WP:BOTPOL (see discussion). WP:HIDEBOTS now mentions how to hide all bots from your watchlist, not only specific bots. The phabricator ticket T162685 is now closed, and we now have "#Bots-Framework" tag, so issues related to bot frameworks can be tracked. Wikibits.js has been removed (see discussion). 21 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). WP:BOTISSUE has been updated to mention that BAG members can act as neutral mediators in bot-related disputes. WP:INTERWIKIBOT has been updated to reflect the post-February 2013 practice of putting interwiki links on Wikidata, rather than on Wikipedia (see discussion). Upcoming HTML Tidy will be phased out in June 2018, or possibly earlier. This may affect some bots (see FAQ). Wikimania Wikimania 2017 is happening in Montreal, during 9–13 August. If you plan to attend, or give a talk, let us know! Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply] (You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IFHT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFHT until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Derek Andrews (talk) 23:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tawker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bots Newsletter, March 2018

Greetings! Here is the 5th issue of the Bots Newsletter (formerly the BAG Newletter). You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: ARBCOM Magioladitis 2 happened, leading to further restrictions on Magioladitis (decision, summary). Betacommand 3 was proposed to be amended to lift the indefinite ban on Δ, but was unsuccessful (decision). A motion concerning Crosswiki issues (mostly concerning Wikidata) was passed (see discussion). BAG Hersfold was removed from the BAG due to long term inactivity. BRFAs We currently have 6 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing! Discussions While there were no large-scale bot-related discussion in the past few months, you can check WP:BOTN and WT:BOTPOL (and their corresponding archives) for smaller issues that came up. New things WP:BOTDICT, a dictionary of common bot-related terms (see discussion). 6 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey happened. Two bot-related proposal passed, #6 deploy Article Alerts to other languages and #10 Commons deletion notification bot, although other entries may affect bots as well. Category:Wikipedia bots and its subcategories has had some cleanup. Bot-related pages that were historically important but are no longer of interests can be found in Category:Wikipedia bots (historical) The edit summary limit has been increased to 1000 characters (see T6715). If a bot you operate relied on the old truncation limit (255 characters), please review/update your code, as overly long summaries can be disruptive/annoying. If you want to use extra characters to have more information in your edit summary, please do so intelligently. You will soon be able to ping users from the edit summary (see T188469). If you wish to use this feature in your bot, please do so intelligently. Upcoming HTML Tidy will be phased out in June 2018, or possibly earlier. This may affect some bots (see FAQ). Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 03:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply] (You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Hey, one of the pages I created named 'Syed Shah Abdul Haq Gilani' was recently deleted after nomination for speedy deletion. This person who nominated it for speedy deletion had no sort of know-how on the subject and accepted the fact too. It is a request if the page is restored or the content's emailed to me for improvement so I could make a new page regarding the same person.

Thanks! Zaydbinumar (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bots Newsletter, August 2018

Greetings! Here is the 6th issue of the Bots Newsletter. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: ARBCOM Nothing particular important happened. Those who care already know, those who don't know wouldn't care. The curious can dig ARBCOM archives themselves. BAG There were no changes in BAG membership since the last Bots Newsletter. Headbomb went from semi-active to active. In the last 3 months, only 3 BAG members have closed requests - help is needed with the backlog. BOTREQs and BRFAs As of writing, we have... 24 active BOTREQs, please help if you can! 5 open BRFAs and 3 BRFAs in need of BAG attention (see live status). 54 approved bot tasks since the start of 2018. Of note, Community Tech bot 5 (the #10 Wish on the 2017 Community Survey) was approved to notify users concerning problematic images and files from Wikimedia Commons. Also If you're a bot operator that can help with Tidy/Linter error cleanup (see discussion, discussion), please file a BRFA! 8 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion, discussion, discussion). Discussions These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active. Use of tags by bots – Exploring the use of a new 'bot' tag. Mass page moves – Bot policy question/clarification about mass moves. Creation of redirects – Bot policy question/clarification about the creation of redirects. Guidance on disruptive use of semi–automated tools? – Related to meatbots (see also MOS discussion, which resulted in small addition to MOS:VAR). Discussion concerning WP:BOTFLAG/WP:RC – A reminder that bots should use the bot flag when it makes sense to use it (see also VPT discussion and CREATEBOT update). Out of curiosity... (to all bot operators) – BotPasswords vs OAuth usage amongst bot operators. Introducing Toolhub – Toolhub is looking for feedback. New things {{Automated tools}}, a new template linking to user-activated tools and scripts has been created. It can be used in articles previews, and can be placed on any non-mainspace page/template (e.g. {{Draft article}}) to provide convenient links to editors. AWB 5.10.0.0 is out, after nearly 20 months without updates. If you run an old version, you will be prompted to install the new version automatically. See the changelog for what's new. Note that the next version will require .NET Framework 4.5. Many thanks to Reedy and the AWB team. BotWatch, "a listing of editors that have made >2 edits per minute [without] a bot flag", is being developed by SQL (see discussion). Massive updates and improvements have been made to Citation bot in the past few months (see discussions, discussions, discussions). You can activate the bot here, amongst other methods. HTML Tidy has been phased out (see Tech News #28). {{Newbot}} has been reorganized a bit (diff). In particular, it links to previously approved BRFAs (see discussion). Wikipedia:Bots#See also has been reorganized a bit (diff). The bot dictionary has two new entries, context bot and context-sensitive edit. The bot request header has been updated to include better guidance (see discussion). The subcategories of Category:Wikipedia bot requests for approval have been sorted in a consistent manner to make past BRFAs easier to find. Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 15:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply] (You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Hello, Tawker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tawker,

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Bot_Approvals_Group#Bulk_inactivity_removals regarding our new activity requirements based on the recent RFC. This will impact your BAG membership, unless you meet the activity requirements in the next 7 days. SQL^{Query me!} 00:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dylan Stephen Jayne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [4]. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 14:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Greetings! Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: ARBCOM Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it. BAG Several (1 + 12 = 13) users have been retired/resigned from the BAG due to inactivity, per our new activity requirements (discussion). BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG. Two BAG members retired Madman (talk · contribs) retired. BU Rob13 (talk · contribs) vanished and retired. Three new BAG members have been voted in, welcome to the BAG! Primefac (talk · contribs) joined on 2018-12-12 (RfBAG). Primefac operates PrimeBOT (talk · contribs) which does a plethora of tasks. TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) joined on 2019-01-21 (RfBAG). TheSandDoctor operates several bots including DeprecatedFixerBot (talk · contribs). Enterprisey (talk · contribs) joined on 2019-08-07 (RfBAG). Enterprisey operates EnterpriseyBot (talk · contribs), which does a plethora of tasks, RemindMeBot (talk · contribs) which posts reminders, and codes several scripts. We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary. BOTDICT Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary Editor-hostile wikitext – describes wikitext structuring that is editor hostile, even if it renders correctly Spectrum of usefulness – describes how tasks are deemed useful or not BOTPOL Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC). Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality. Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION. BOTREQs and BRFAs As of writing, we have... 20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can! 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status). In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied. Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied. 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion). New things All bot-related discussion pages now have a centralized and searchable archive box (see discussion). Discussions are searchable per noticeboard, or globally. {{Bot}} now supports |status=expired (see discussion). This led to the deletion of Category:Indefinitely blocked Wikipedia bots as useless (see discussion). WP:BOTREQ now mentions WP:SCRIPTREQ and WP:AWBTASKS as alternatives to bot requests. The bot creation guide now mentions bot flags, and two new languages Awk and MATLAB. Other minor tweaks have been made. AAlertBot has received major code updates. In particular, WP:AALERTS will now report splits, mergers, and AFC submissions. Citation bot has received several updates (User talk:Citation bot/Archive 10/11/12/13/14/15/16/17). In particular, the bot stopped the automated removal of |publisher= from {{cite journal}}, and stopped the automated addition of CiteSeerX links, and now uses OAuth to authenticate those who make requests of the bot. Other discussions These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active. Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Adminbots requests page Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Double-redirect tagging (2019) Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Long and Winding Road to Parsoid Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Bot-like user scripts Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#WP:URLREQ Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Wikipedia:Bots/Status Wikipedia talk:Bot Approvals Group#Minimum edits Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Minor update to WP:BOTISSUE Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Semi-automated Portal creation Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Clarification on "Bots operated by multiple users" Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Bots triggered by multiple users Wikipedia talk:Bots#How to use Special:ApiFeatureUsage See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard. Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply] (You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sentinel school library.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:DFD. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Wikipedia:DFD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are receiving this message because you have either contributed to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests in the past six months or are an active editor listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/verified users. I have started a discussion regarding the project's current status at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on open proxies#Reboot, you are invited to participate in the discussion. If you are not interested in the project, no action is required on your part; this is a one-time notification and you will not receive any further messages. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC) (on behalf of User:GeneralNotability)[reply]

Hello! I noticed you've made edits to Ricky Martin articles. I thought you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Ricky Martin We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ricky Martin and his discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

آرمین هویدایی (talk) 16:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, December 2021

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. BRFA activity by month Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Wikipedia's Bots Newsletter, your source for all things bot. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots. Our last issue was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots. Overall Between September and December 2019, there were 33 BRFAs. Of these, Y 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful (N2 3 denied, ? 3 withdrawn, and 2 expired). September 2019 Y Monkbot 16, DannyS712 bot 60, Ahechtbot 6, PearBOT 3, Qbugbot 3 · N2 DannyS712 bot 5, PkbwcgsBot 24 · ? DannyS712 bot 61, TheSandBot 4 TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput: Beeblebrox noted that the bot for maintaining on-wiki records of UTRS appeals stopped working a while ago. TParis, the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Wikipedia", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While OAuth was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot [...] but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, SQL ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019. Article-measuring contest resumed: The list of Wikipedians by article count, which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by GreenC following a bot request. October 2019 Y OAbot 3, DannyS712 bot 47, Pathbot 2, PearBOT 2, DannyS712 bot 59, DannyS712 bot 62, HasteurBot 14, PearBOT 4, WOSlinkerBot 4, MilHistBot 5 Curb Safe Charmer adopts reFill: TAnthony pointed out that reFill 2's bug reports were going unanswered; creator Zhaofeng Li had retired from Wikipedia, and a maintainer was needed. As of June 2021, Curb Safe Charmer had taken up the mantle, saying: "Not that I have all the skills needed but better me than nobody! 'Maintainer' might be too strong a term though. Volunteers welcome!" November 2019 Y BHGbot 4, YiFeiBot 2, DannyS712 bot III 64 · ? PearBOT Old bots do new tricks: DannyS712 bot III 64 prowled redirects, YiFeiBot 2 archived GoCE requests, and BHGbot 4 removed links to portals deleted at MfD (until its authorization was revoked in January at operator BrownHairedGirl's request). December 2019 Y DemonDays64 Bot, DannyS712 bot III 66, Bot1058 6, Monkbot 15, MilHistBot 6, PearBOT 5, DannyS712 bot IV 65 · N2 SportsStatsBot · Xinbenlv bot, SteveBot 8 Redirects to be autopatrolled: A RfC took place at WP:NPP, closing with unanimous consensus that new redirects should be automatically marked as patrolled by bot. DannyS712 wasted no time, and submitted DannyS712 bot III 66 the next day; it passed two days after that. 200,000 bios get short descs: Along a similar vein, Bot1058 6 was approved to remove disambiguation pages from Category:Monitored short pages and a new bot (DemonDays64 Bot) changed lots of http links to https using JavaScript Wiki Browser. One particularly neat task, PearBOT 5, automatically generated short descriptions for more than 200,000 biographies. In the next issue of Bots Newsletter: What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers? What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page? What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild? Will reFill ever get fixed? What's up with ListeriaBot, anyway? Python 3.4 deprecation? In my PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!) These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the January 2022 Bots Newsletter. Tune in, or miss out! Signing off... jp×g 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] (You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)