User talk:Bablu Baghel

Hi... I'm Bablu Baghel from Bhidauni, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, i love to exploring new and unknown places.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bablu Baghel has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for this specific type of article, you may want to check out our criterion for biographies. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Myspace or Facebook for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Raraya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Can find no sources to support even that this clan exists, let alone that it is a part of the wider Baghela community. Can't redirect in these circumstances.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 13:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Dear vs Bear, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Humpty Sharma Ki Dulhania. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dear vs Bear requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/moviemicro/cast/id/746214. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 08:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Braj Bhasha

added links pointing to Kaman and Bajna

Manoj Pandit

added a link pointing to Love Is Forever

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bablu Baghel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dear vs Bear for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:53, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

after deletion, you reentered the same text. This is not acceptable, and i hqaqvve deleted it. You cannot pcut and paste material from outside sources to make a Wikipedia article. It's a copyright violation.

I notice that considerable portions of the article Bhidauni are also copied from an outside source--I identified some from About Bhidauni by Onefivenine.com and the rest may be also. Please immediately remove all such material, and rewrite it from scratch. DGG ( talk ) 19:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DGG ( talk ) 19:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manoj Pandit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghaziabad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bablu Baghel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Leena Paul for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Brij Sthali Academy, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.brijsthaliacademy.com/bsa/?page_id=34.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Brij Sthali Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.brijsthaliacademy.com/bsa/?page_id=34. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 09:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bablu Baghel. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 11:49, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Bablu Baghel, thanks for creating Dear vs Bear!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Bablu Baghel, thanks for creating PYAAR vs KHAP PANCHAYAT!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bablu Baghel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bablu Baghel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 12:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bhidauni

added a link pointing to Nai

Tyson Paul

added a link pointing to Alone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bablu Baghel/Bablu baghel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 11:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bablu Baghel, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 11:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mira Rajput requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 21:28, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ahamadpur, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.onefivenine.com/india/artic/10767/OverView-Of-Ahamadpur.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ahamadpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.onefivenine.com/india/artic/10767/OverView-Of-Ahamadpur. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Abhaipura Banger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://villageinfo.in/uttar-pradesh/mathura/mat/abhaipura-banger.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:53, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Udhar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.census2011.co.in/data/village/123964-udhar-uttar-pradesh.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bhadanwara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.onefivenine.com/india/villages/Mathura/Mat/Bhadanwara. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sihavan Bangar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.census2011.co.in/data/village/123921-sihavan-bangar-uttar-pradesh.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 22:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pyaar vs Khap Panchayat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyaar vs Khap Panchayat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 23:09, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mant Tehsil

added links pointing to Saur, Sikanderpur, Gonga and Suraj

Abhaipura Banger

added links pointing to Raya and Bajna

Bhadanwara

added links pointing to Raya and Bajna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bablu Baghel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 11:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 17:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Pyaar vs Khap Panchayat. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 17:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policies. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 04:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bablu Baghel/Bablu baghel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:30, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bablu Baghel, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:30, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Meera Thankur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rubbish computer 23:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kewat Nagla

added a link pointing to Raya

Shihavan Bangar

added a link pointing to Raya

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We do not sign articles on Wikipedia, please stop using Template:User Bablu Baghel on articles--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also you are not an administrator, and representing yourself as such is highly inappropriate--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:45, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manoj Pandit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Is Forever. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the Bhidauni article you cite four separate web sites for the PIN code. One citation is sufficient if it is a reliable source, if none of them are reliable sources, citing four does not do any better than citing one. You might find some useful information in the essay Wikipedia:Citation overkill. --Bejnar (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Meera Devi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. . Shlok _{talk .} 12:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pyaar vs Khap Panchayat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please note that Wikipedia:Userboxes are not meant to be added to articles. Thanks, NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mant (Assembly constituency), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shergarh and Husaini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ranjana Baghel.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bablu Baghel. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bablu baghel".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of villages in Mant Tehsil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a list without any sources that fails WP:LISTN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bablu Baghel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arjayay (talk) 08:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article [[B ChandrakalaProletariat100percent (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)‎]] has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on [[|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

A tag has been placed on Veer Arjun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sanjeev Vedwan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FILMMAKER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lovely Joshi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bablu Baghel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Action Raja, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FITINDIA (talk) 03:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sanjay Sriivastava requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FITINDIA (talk) 03:47, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sanjay Sriivastava, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. FITINDIA (talk) 05:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Action Raja has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased Movie that has no significance in the Bhojpuri film industry .

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FITINDIA (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you agree that Rashtriya Inter Collage Surir has the wrong name and should really be Rashtriya Inter College Surir. I'm finding lots of page names with minor problems, and could move this to the 'college' name. Shenme (talk) 06:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shenme Thank you for the lookup over Rashtriya Inter College Surir. I find it's a minor problem. Rashtriya Inter College Surir is know widely range over the local public & student book mention with same, so we can not change the same. if you might think it's needed. you can do Changes or One More Think one of my Village Wiki Page Need to Changes or source with Native Name Bhidauni as Bhidoni both names exists. both names will possible to set over Wikipedia. can I discuss to fix the same. Village Graph Page is on Good Standard.

Thank You!

Hmm, maybe one of us is confused?

I was worried over the word 'Coll e ge', which in the article title is misspelled 'Coll a ge'. 'a' instead of the correct letter 'e'. If you look above, when you typed in the link Rashtriya Inter College Surir it is seen as red, showing that that title name does not exist. When I use the misspelled link name Rashtriya Inter Collage Surir it shows up as blue, because the article exists under that misspelled name.

Can you confirm that "Rashtriya Inter College Surir" is the correct name? Then we can move the existing article to that correct name. I know this is a very small thing, but we want people coming to Wikipedia to find articles as easy as possible. Using the correctly spelled word 'college' might help them. Shenme (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bablu Baghel,
It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.

What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.

Who should join?

• Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
• An editor must have 500+ edits.
• Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017

The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here.
Regards. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:26, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Raria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG also please see previous deletion log Raraya

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sapna Choudhary has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JTtheOG (talk) 04:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lovely Joshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovely Joshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 13:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tyson Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyson Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bablu Baghel and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Enaya Afzal.....📝 (Talk) 07:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tyson Paul has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Enaya Afzal.....📝 (Talk) 16:56, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dear vs Bear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NFILM with no reviews in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article List Of Baghel Gotras has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:LISTCRUFT at best. No significance given and using PROD only because it doesn't cleanly fit a CSD category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RS to see what are acceptable references. Caste websites or random blogs are not acceptable sources. An article about a person with last name "Baghel" is not a valid source for the article on Baghela clan. utcursch | talk 20:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Baghel Society, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sitush (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Baghel clans has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sitush (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bankey Bihari ji Temple (Dewala) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bankey Bihari ji Temple (Dewala) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references. Does not state anything notable about the building. Not every building or place of worship is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I Think you may right as per your point of view If a temple is located in a village and It's to be dedicated to Hindu God Krishna and It's it the Birthplace of God, Every person comes here for worship each morning and there is another temple also, Dewala Mandir is very old and very popular among villagers which is located in Bhidauni Village. as I created Bhidauni Village Page when i was i create it that also need verifiable links but not not required. bcos after day to day i founds so many links related to village and i update these and now Bhidauni village page on good standing. after day to day i will be process it soon. and find the links and books which mention village name.

Thank You Admin. Bablu Baghel

The article Mukesh Dagar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO and WP:NPOLITICIAN there is no inherent notability in being a Municipal councilor of a ward in a medium size city/town in India and almost all the coverage is not about him as a subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FITINDIA (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yogesh Nauhwar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-elected politician fails WP:NPOL and no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to support WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bablu Baghel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Saini Mohalla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear whether this article is about an ethnic group, an organization, a city, etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sudip Pandey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor lacking in-depth, non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 22:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sudip Pandey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudip Pandey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 12:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like an advertisement for the subject, and to show notability , references are needed providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devkinandan Thakur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Devkinandan Thakur, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bablu Baghel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:35, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bablu Baghel. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bablu Baghel. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bablu Baghel|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bhojpuriya Bhaiya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy film notability as written. Does not contain enough information to be encyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sudip Pandey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sudip Pandey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 06:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bablu Baghel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dr Vivek Bindra, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:16, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Bablu Baghel, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bablu Baghel|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, How can you blame me likei this. Its is very serious to me because i have never taken money from anyone. When i watching his videos on youtube I think a impressive Motivational speaker. It is not a good idea to blame anyone like this. Change your own view sir. You have given me a sum of money. Somebody should come and tell me from whom I have got any money. You must have proof before you have any blame.

Bablu Baghel 03:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Apart from paid editing can you please disclose your connection with user Pappuad and M.k.pappu? GSS (talk|c|em) 04:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection with anyone. I usually make edit and changes while I think It's should be on Wikipedia. so I start a article.

I have enough evidence (on-wiki and off-wiki) to prove your connection with user M.k.pappu and paid editing so I'm requesting you once again to be transparent while editing for pay. Please see WP:PAID for more. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:20, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any proof then present it and waste time for idle things, do not take anything personal. Everyone knows Wikipedia is free. I never got money from anyone for Wikipedia.

I have put some new media sources today and please check Vivek Bindra's article Draft.

As you know, Mr. CSS blames me that I do marketing trees or I write wrong on Wikipedia that I have a thinking that I can not change it but I say that whatever I do is with good resources And I do not take any stomach money from anyone. before start any article i check all the facts. 

[19/01 11:30 am] Bablu Baghel: Dr. Vivek Bindra is a well-known International Motivational Speaker and his sayings are very beneficial to the business man and he has articles in every news and large newspapers leave his articles such as Enterprises.com and There are many news papers that are very fast latest and growing newspapers in which their news is spreading whether it is wrong.

I do not have any connection with anyone or anyone else, tell me one thing that I have used for the source Dr. Vivek Bindra, is not it right, do not match the WIKI policy. How can I be insure the links is reliable with living person. if you continue to remove the same article that is person correct information. How you can decide to people have there information on Wikipedia. did you ask for information your own. why should I delete the article without resources.

Tell me how many links in need for a person article or which news paper. why you forget human beings publish the news of any person. I thought Dr. Vivek Bindra have enough media coverage to have a Wikipedia article.

I have viewed the off-wiki evidence mentioned by User:GSS above, and am sufficiently convinced that you are engaged in undisclosed paid editing, and that this account is related to the accounts User:Pappuad and User:M.k.pappu. Consequently, your account has been blocked from editing. Yunshui ^雲_水 11:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a paid editor. I would love to write notability things over internet. I have create Devkinandan Thakur ji wikipedia that also declined and than started Sudip Pandey that is also declined... and finally write a article for Dr. Vivek Bindra that also declined. you gays not suggest me how can i do batter. if all the living people profiles declined how can i earn money from Wikipedia. So I would like to request you that kindly suggest me how can i do batter in Wikipedia. How can I distribute my knowledge to world wide web on behalf Wikipedia.

Kindly Review my Last Article Creation.... you can not fold my hand to do so. I'm free Independent article creator without a valid reason how can you do that. kindly public the evidence if you seen anything if required i will clarify all the things.

The article Baghel Samaj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails GNG and, like many caste organisations, may just be the hobbyhorse of a very small number of caste members

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 13:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unable to edit wikipedia now...someone css complaint against me still I'm unable to edit of modified wikipedia.

Can anyone set the expire date to unblock me... If i made a mistake block is not good idea. I still saying I'm not engage with someone. if I have relation or know someone. how you can block me. what is my mistake. still I'm not clear what is my mistke...

What is My Mistake

CSS if you convince maybe you have personal problem with the person. still waiting for clarification.

you need to answer my last article creation. you guys not replying me. Chor-Chor Mausere Bhai, ye khawat sahi nikli.

if there is someone who can find good enough evidence my for paid editing. what i do wrong.

my article still live on wikipedia. if i had mistake warn me. block is a option is not good for #wikipedia.

I'm Active over wikipedia since 2013 and my first article my my village article Bhidauni, I have also created wikipedia for local celebrities some is deleted and some is exist. Css active since 2015 or 2016. how can a junior gays replace me. He is doing good I'm happy with this but blaming me. How can someone paid me. Sudip Pandey Article still pending I think we have not enough media source to make it live but Dr Vivek Bindra have enough media sources. why you gays not responding me over my last edit. please check given links and my edit article.

Thanks Bablu Baghel

I found that User:M.k.pappu is edited my some articles. which is orgiaannly created by me.

one of "Santosh Mishra ‎" he made few edits. I found this only.

Now my question is if a person edit my article and he is blocked why I'm blocked for following the reason.

• What is my location or what is m.k pappu location - must check ip location
• Why I created Santhosh mishra. (M.k edit this) or Sudip Pandey article
• I don't know m.k pappu
• I don't know why you block me.
• Someone edit my article and blocked or any reason it's not my fault.

Why I created article of Santosh Mishra one of my teacher turned actor Shri Manoj Pandit still his page not exist on wikipedia. said to me to create a article for him, if a person is popular in media for a special work to contribute.

Why I created Sudip Pandey

I meet him in a movie release and we talked nicely and found he is a good enough popular on internet and think to create a article for him. in the article I have not promote someone.

So think all over and my contributed filed.

I'm a social activist and local Contribution of Rural area's I originally mention all about me on wikipedia

• I would like to create article for so many villages in our area and where i went up. basically Editors not create articles for villages.

Farmers and villagers need to attention and Bill Gates the only person who thinks matter like this. but still our area out of reach from Respected Bill gates.

I would to created articles for who deserved. Looking someone help me.

Thank you !

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

"eminent", "energetic" etc

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivek Bindra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vivek Bindra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know that if I bloked by someone by a misunderstanding and if i have done such mistakes in my edits.so i want to know. Without a valid resion kind of think in not good. Bloker person said I'm convinced so mean i bloked. If i have mistke assist me if not stoped than do block.

Thanks Bablu Baghel

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bablu Baghel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption; I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. User:GSS Please re-check my blocking User:Yunshui and set a expiry. I feel very bad after blocking and realized I'm done some cheap mistakes and I promised that I never jump the rules and will always use my best of knowledge to written on trending topics as well unknown facts about real people and place. you also can check that i have created so many article for Indian Rural Village. Kindly look at once and help me to get unblock and resume my writing with best of my knowledge and Wikipedia guidelines.

Decline reason:

You have not addressed the reason for your block which is your involvement with undisclosed paid editing. Please address that in any future unblock request. only (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bablu Baghel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Senior Admin, I pray for well being for you and the people around you.

Dear Admin,

Confession: First of all, I am apologetic and liable for my block. In the past, also i never overlook like promotion at the time but with my content is not false. my all articles which i was created in past they all are live and useful of people. A mess created when i started write a article about Sudip Pandey (a bhijpuri film actor) and a speaker and author Dr. Vivek Bindra but at the time and with my understanding somehow i made a mistake that content i was created look like promotional and got blocked. The block was necessary, and it made me understood do write neutral, now I seek your grace and assure that i will never repeat the same. Kindly grant me a chance to stay a part of Wikipedia.

Reason for block I was not aware that promotional content get me stuck in editing and can not do much biographies of living, but I did it, and it is against the polic Now on i shall take care. admin viewed the off-wiki evidence mentioned by User:GSS above, and he is convinced that I engaged in undisclosed paid editing, and that this account is related to the accounts User:Pappuad and User:M.k.pappu. Consequently, my account has been blocked from editing. Yunshui ^雲_水

If unblocked: I shall start from scratch and contribute constructively and positively. I shall assist a senior editor in learning. I am a web professional and content writer and can participate in editing various topic related to village and towns.

What i will do differently: I will always write neutral point of view. I shall follow the WP:5P, WP:OWN and, WP:PAID. I shall be careful and disciplined. Why this block is bothering me: The block is seriously affecting my self-respect. I was wrong, and i am punished now. And it is a life long lesson for me.

Block is no more required: I had sufficient penalty and learned the lesson. I am hopeful that admin can allow me an opportunity. I am sure i will prove the admin, right.

Best Regards ~~Bablu Baghel~~

Decline reason:

I think you need to explain your connection to User:FMEINDIA and User:Scrumnexus. You're on the same IP address as FMEINDIA, and this person is writing drafts about Bablu Baghel. And there's the obvious issue of Scrumnexus's user page, as below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: Please have a look at this User:Scrumnexus and this edit on Commons. - FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 19:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bablu Baghel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

' Explain I started writing on Wikipedia in 2012, which I created a page with my own name, Bablu Baghel. One day I thought that Motivational speaker Vivek Bindra is very famous and I have to write an article for him and that incident has disturbed my mind and i leaved writing editing over wikipedia. after 2and three year later again i chose to start writing in wikipedia and created a new user User:Scrumnexus and after done some edit i busy in other works and forget this username. After all that i start witn new user name User:FMEINDIA and start editing. who block me A user User:Gss convinced a senior editor User:Yunshui and my user page User:Bablu Baghel was blocked. Humble Request Dear User:GSS kindly look into my explanation and help me to get out from all this. so i can start with a fresh mind. Auth I assure you that you wll not realize you made a mistake after unblock me. I will start traing under seniors and i will dissed ever topics before start... kindly help me to get unblock. Best Regards Bablu Baghel

Decline reason:

This request does not address the concerns that you were engaged in paid editing and/or self-promotion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bablu Baghel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Expatiation: I wrote an article about a living person Dr. Vivek Bindra was about, "The topic sounded like hype because the reliable sources were mentioned in a way that I found that I wrote. This was my biggest mistake, now I am aware of it. Which led to the administration realizing that my editing was a subject promoting and financial sharing. WP:PAID. Now I understand that it was against Wikipedia's policy. I was asked on my talk page connection with User:Pappuad and User:M.k.pappu. All relevant information that my information was correct I have shared on my talk page. Reason for block They felt that the nature of my editing gives an impression that I have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a subject, due to which my user was blocked. Which is just a feeling that there is no truth in it. They claimed that I have broken the Terms of Use violation. A User Yunshui have seen GSS's off-wiki evidence and am convinced. My user account has been blocked since then. Explain Other Account User:FMEINDIA and User:Scrumnexus thease both is my user name which i was started when my original user name blocked and that time I'm not much aware how to Unblock User Name. I bit edited with Scrumnexus and forget the username and i created User:FMEINDIA and create some article with this. when i was creating these i dont know that its also break the rules on Wikipedia. someone ask me connection with thease account and ip and at the time i admit both is my account. After that both account got blocked and articles also deleted. If unblocked: I will start from scratch and contribute creatively and positively. I will learn from the senior editor and help. I am a rustic content writer and can participate in the editing of various topics related to villages and towns.

Decline reason:

Hello Bablu Baghel. I sympathise with your frustration that you have been blocked from editing. However, after reviewing the contributions you have made on this account from 2015, and your two other identified accounts, I note that almost everything you have created on Wikipedia has been deleted. I then looked at the deleted contents and, disregarding notability and promotional concerns, your standard of English writing is fairly weak. While anyone can edit Wikipedia we do ask that people have enough competence to edit constructively and not to create unnecessary work for other volunteers. See Wikipedia:Competence is required. Your English language skills are not quite at the level sufficient for you to be creating articles on the English Wikipedia, and your understanding of our procedures needs improvement. Putting together the concerns about paid editing, the sockpuppeting, and your current level of competence, I see no advantage to Wikipedia, to yourself, or to our volunteers in unblocking you at this time. You have asked several times to be unblocked, and this is your fourth use of the unblock template. Each time you request an unblock, a volunteer spends some time looking into your request. For your own sake, and for the sake of our volunteers, please do not again request an unblock until at least six months have passed. If you do decide to make another request after at least six months have passed, you should put forward an honest and detailed explanation of what has happened, and demonstrate a sufficient ability to edit Wikipedia without causing problems or wasting the time of our volunteers. It might help your case if you agreed not to create new articles, and to concentrate solely on improving existing articles on villages in India. And it would also help your case if you could point to articles you have edited on your native language Wikipedia. SilkTork (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment You are not being forthright about your accounts. You say I bit edited with Scrumnexus and forget the username and i created User:FMEINDIA and create some article with this, So can you please explain this edit on Commons on September 21, 2020 by User:Scrumnexus. - FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 09:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Thank you Fitindia for reviewing my explanation yeah its true as best of my knowledge, I started editing Wikipedia with user Scrumnexus. After remembering a lot, I could not remember my old user Scrumnexus, so I had created a new user ID in the name of the new user FMEINDIA. Then when I could not remember this user Scrumnexus. One day when I was watching Revision History of my oldest article Bhidauni which I edited from User:Bablu Baghel, then I came to know about the Scrumnexus user. Please suggest me what to do so that my user can get unlock. Thank you Bablu Baghel ☎ 21:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bablu Baghel, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

BOVINEBOY2008 11:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change – This SPI case is open. to – A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Hey, I just checked my investigation about sockpuppetry. There is many reason to blocked my user Bablu Baghel and your decision and time also appreciated. Suspected sockpuppets Pappuad (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) Actionraja (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is just a incident as we both edit it on same time. Dear User:GSS I agree with you but you need to give a chance to me for my explanation. I hope all editor look about the starting concor and look again to get my user unblock. I have good faith and Baghel ☎ 10:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that their huge overlap with page titles was in my understanding of the bigger reason so I created several other blocked paid editors that were involved I have nothing to do with the drafts I removed there are no similarities between it I am sorry for this and in future I resolve to make all the pages done by me with pure material and source, please give me a chance so that I can make an important contribution by rectifying my mistake. This case is not old, this matter is under consideration but was confirmed in Sept 2020 based on the tag, so it could be an initiative that Baghel ☎ 10:08, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, user:Yamla. I know very well that I have hoped for unblocked many times but every time I have been disappointed. You must be thinking that I disturb you people by doing this but it is not like that at all, I have no such intention but which mistake I did not That I have served 2 years of his sentence, please tell me only that when can I get the freedom to write on Wikipedia now, I am tired of trying, guide me. Baghel ☎ 09:07, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bablu Baghel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have read and understood Terms of use violation of the Wikipedia. user:GSS showed the off wiki evidence to Mr user: yunshui at that time and prevented me from editing. After that I inadvertently created two user accounts which turned out to be a big mistake of mine and I was made a sock puppet Now I have realized my mistake that it was appropriate to block me. Now assure me I have learned a lot from my mistakes and I have made many appeals which were rejected, please give me some rights now, please unblock this account and help me to work on wikipedia. :::

Decline reason:

You knew perfectly well what you were doing when you created Ibablubaghel, having been previously caught and having previously engaged in discussion about your other sockpuppet accounts. You seem to still be attempting to mislead us. Nor does this remotely come close to addressing your multi-year long history of inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 11:36, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bablu Baghel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked back in January 2019 for suspicion of taking financial stake than committed sockpuppetry for creating multiple user. I have since learnt that such things go against Wikipedia guidelines and I won't engage in activities like this again. I wish to continue making positive contributions in line with what is expected of Wikipedia and understand the outcomes of sockpuppetry. I hope you guys reconsider my unblock request under WP:SO. Thank you

Decline reason:

You again seem to suggest that it was only after the final part of sockpuppeting that you gained the slightest inkling that it was problematic, when that clearly is not the case. Additionally, you don't handle any of the other problematic editing behaviour raised on these long talk pages, and just that "ish to continue making positive contributions" when it was far from a string of positive edits you'd been making. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.