User talk:Rovingrobert

Archives

1, 2

Unspecified source/license for File:Gotye — Video Mirrors album 2011–2013.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Gotye — Video Mirrors album 2011–2013.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gotye — Video Mirrors album 2011–2013.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Aquinas College have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. The Banner talk 09:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Aquinas College. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Banner talk 09:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And who the fuck are you? Rovingrobert (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody who objects against personal attacks from somebody breaking proper links. I have now been repairing your edits twice. There still is no need to remove a proper red link to a college. (But at least your unlinking is less unconstructive than the previous edit linking to the city.) The Banner talk 14:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: Oh, you're that guy. Now kindly explain what you consider constructive about removing my use of the word 'tertiary'. Rovingrobert (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you are talking about. But I am talking about this edit and this edit. To be true, the strange removal was not from your hand. The Banner talk 15:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had written "tertiary" residential college — I guess that was part of the reverted material. On the other hand, I seem to have completely misread the situation. I had no right to react the way I did; please accept my apologies. Rovingrobert (talk) 15:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm.... But the sermon in church yesterday was about forgiving. So I forgive you your sins but please sin no more. The Banner talk 17:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC) At least towards me.[reply]

I can agree to that! Rovingrobert (talk) 02:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Russian_entry_into_World_War_I#Unfortunate_edit Rjensen (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Bill Hader. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All taken care of! Thanks for flagging it! Btw, you can always remove any copyvio yourself in the future. retsacennS (Talk) (Pain and Suffering) 03:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you tell me some more about Adam Gilchrist's role in this TV series please? The article you're editing is a Featured Article, so we need to be really sensitive about what we add and whether or not it's actually notable. A slightly more reliable source would help, but the one you cited seems to suggest it's a guest appearance or something, not exactly a starring role. But I could be entirely wrong. So, what can you tell me? Ta. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding "alternate" players to tennis infoboxes and templates. If you want to change longstanding consensus I invite you to bring it to Tennis Project talk to discuss. I don't agree that alternates deserve an infobox entry or a template change, but perhaps most will think as you do if you discuss it. Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fyunck(click): Not consensus, it’s used in many players’ stats (I won’t tell you which, lest you revert them) – but yes, would be good to start the conversation. Rovingrobert (talk) 23:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have asked for changing your username because you want to "Vanish", but after changing it you continue editing! This is not allowed. If you decide to return back, you must ask for rename again. (see this). --Dr-Taher (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr-Taher: Leave me alone, you’re going to give me a damn heart attack! Far out, I’ll change the username, but you don’t have to be so confrontational about it. Vanished user 1294567 (talk) 11:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy vanishing is granted on the condition that you promise not to return to the project. You're the one who broke that promise. Nardog (talk) 12:40, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, There is a question for you here.--Dr-Taher (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tennis players playing touchtennis has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 15:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm I'm tla. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Frank Arkell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TLA (talk) 08:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]