Talk:Nagpur orange

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

edit
history
watch
purge

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a cultivar infobox be included in this article to improve its quality.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Merge discussion

Doesn't look like there is consensus to merge the two articles. --regentspark (comment) 23:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nagpur orange is a variety of citrus fruit recently recognized with a geographical indication, and the city of Nagpur is nicknamed "Orange City". Furthermore, there are a few publications that discuss the oranges of Nagpur, such as A Dictionary of the Economic Products of India, first published in 1889 and still in (digital) print. Nevertheless, the article is currently a stub with decidedly non-neutral point of view. I found several publications calling Nagpur "Orange City", but only a handful describing the fruit itself. The fruit might be notable, but in its current state I think the article could best be merged to Nagpur pending better sourcing and expansion. (Alternately, it could be merged with Mandarin orange, which currently lists several cultivars.) Cnilep (talk) 02:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was agreeing at first, but it looks like it is an informally named but distinct and popular variety of the mandarin orange, Citrus reticulata. Here are 2 searches with lots of results for fleshing out the article: 1 2. So one possibility might be to keep the article and rename to Nagpur mandarin, and set Nagpur orange as a redirect there.--Tom Hulse (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as is or move to Nagpur mandarin (although in common parlance it is typically referred to as NO, but scientific publications tend to favor the NM name) or if a merge is absolutely necessary then the target should be Mandarin orange, not the city. There are a fair few scientific publications dealing with this particular variety: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] etc etc as well as mainstream coverage of research and development around this variety: [6] etc, it also has a Geographical indication tag [7] etc, there's sufficient coverage to improve it, but I can't make head or tail of biological terms, so I'll let someone more capable do that. —SpacemanSpiff 18:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As is often the case with foodstuffs, it's not clear exactly what the term refers to. It seems to be a group of cultivars grown around Nagpur rather than a specific cultivar. I would myself favour deleting the article, but otherwise merge with Mandarin orange. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good description. Perhaps a cultivar group that has not been yet formally described, but is very widely used. I would lean towards trying to keep something here, since I believe there really is a distinct group of plants here with definable characteristics per voluminous sources, and it is an important Asian crop with quite a bit of serious scientific study done on them. --Tom Hulse (talk) 17:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm against the merger. I think it has it's own notability. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree too that both are different topics and should trade under different page names. --sanketholey (talk) Sanket 00:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the merger. Both topics are distinct. Piyushdan (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.