Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 28

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hatnoted State Kremlin Palace at the target. Jay 💬 10:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Kremlin Palace → Grand Kremlin Palace  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Kremlin Palace" is ambiguous. An attempt by @SrpskiAnonimac: to convert this redirect to a disambiguation page (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1128311709&oldid=19147393&title=Kremlin_Palace) (which I support) was reverted by @Natg 19: with edit summary "undo - longstanding redirect, use RFD", so... Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Normally the "Kremlin Palace" means Grand Kremlin Palace. Can you cite recent instances where it stands for something else? Ghirla^-трёп- 17:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Add hatnote to State Kremlin Palace at the Grand Kremlin Palace article. I think that should still fulfil the function of the dab while keeping the redirect at the same target. --Lenticel ^(talk) 08:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and add hatnote to State Kremlin Palace per Ghirlandajo and Lenticel. Grand Kremlin Palace seems to be the primary topic, no need for a DAB per WP:ONEOTHER. A7V2 (talk) 07:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Untied Plankton Pictures → Stephen Hillenburg#Other pursuits  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelling of the name of the production company established by Hillenburg. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:19, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Although, even when scraping the bottom of the barrel, all websites I could find used the correct name, there's a chance out there that someone might think that the television company was actually called that. After all, the screen that the name appears on only appears for 2 seconds, and that's short enough for misspellings to appear. User:Someone-123-321 (chitter chatter, I contribute) 07:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Jay 💬 12:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 15:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom as an unlikely and sort of ambiguous misspelling. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).