Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 24

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Political decay#Political instability. (non-admin closure) feminist (+) 10:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Political instability → Failed state  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Political stability → Failed state  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Political instability may occur whether or not the state is failed. So delete this redirection to create a page on this topic. 2409:4061:2DCF:43B5:D910:79AE:97FC:F310 (talk) 09:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I've looked at the related article Political Instability Task Force and it seems that partial and total state failures are considered as periods of political instability --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Retarget to Political decay#Political instability. MB 20:11, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Political decay#Political instability with {{R to section}}Coastside (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Political stability also redirects to failed state. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 07:04, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Bundled for the reason that Political stability was initially created as a redirect to the redirect Political instability ! Jay ^(Talk) 19:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MB and Coastside: Any suggestions for the late addition to the nomination? — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 02:13, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't really want to put this in writing, but retarget the same place and leave it to the reader to surmise that political stability is the opposite of political instability. Unless anyone has a better suggestion. MB 02:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's totally fine. Just tag it with {{R from antonym}} in addition to {{R to section}}. You can get away with a lot with the right tags...

• Comment. The nom was blocked two days after making this nomination. The redirect creator was not notified; I have done that now. The IP appears to be a useful editor; pinging Drmies who has done the block. Jay ^(Talk) 13:57, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jay, there is an enormous amount of disruption and socking going on in that range; CU has been run maybe a hundred times in the last three years, and the log shows at least half a dozen SPIs are involved. Drmies (talk) 14:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep 30 Billion Gang, delete the others. Thryduulf (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• O.B.O Clothing Line Ltd. → Davido Music Worldwide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 30 Billion Gang → Davido Music Worldwide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Obama Music Worldwide → Davido Music Worldwide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Aloma Music Worldwide → Davido Music Worldwide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 30 Billion Gang as discussed in pulse.ng [1] Legit.ng [2] globaitimesng.com [3] The Obama and Aloma ones need more mainstream news discussion. OBO clothing isn't clear and should be mentioned in Davido's article if it is a major brand. OBO can refer to his album. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 30 Billion Gang per the above. Princess of Ara 07:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep 30 Billion Gang and delete the rest per above. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:09, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Forge (level editor)#Legacy. ✗plicit 00:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Grifball → Rooster Teeth#Grifball  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unneeded redirect; links to a now nonexistent section EthanGaming7640 (talk) 19:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Forge (level editor)#Legacy which covers this. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 03:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Forge (level editor)#Legacy._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Postcore → Post-hardcore  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I have never heard or read someone use this term in clear reference to this genre. The term is not mentioned at the target article. It is unclear, and could also possibly be confused for or refer to a mix of post-metal and metalcore from the likes of bands like Spiritbox and Loathe. dannymusiceditor ^oops 15:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - per above. Not a likely search term, as evidenced by its average of 0 daily views. Sergecross73 msg me 16:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per above two. Jonjonjohny (talk) 07:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Paige Butcher → Eddie Murphy#Personal life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Paige Butcher has been in a relationship with Eddie Murphy since 2012, and they were engaged in 2018. However, she has been independently notable - she was on the cover of Maxim in 2003 and 2004, and had a part role in Big Momma's House 2 in 2006. The current target is only about her part in Murphy's life, and doesn't do justice to her modelling credits, and would suggest to Delete. Jay ^(Talk) 05:51, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Per WP:NOTBROKEN and redirects are not harmful. Also, see the various lists under Category:Playboy lists. Models who don't have their own articles redirect to these lists. Paige Butcher should be in a similar position. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not understand. By saying Paige Butcher should be in a similar position, are you suggesting to retarget to one of the lists? Jay ^(Talk) 06:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Unless and until someone writes an article about her, the content we have is better than nothing. Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of people on the cover of Maxim magazine#2004 {{R from person}} {{R from list entry}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coastside (talk • contribs) 14:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  She is listed for 2003 as well. Jay ^(Talk) 05:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now. Nothing prevents anyone from adding some brief information about her modeling career at the current target or turning the redirect into an article. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Simult → Simultaneity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I see no evidence anywhere that this is actually a word. The only reference I see on the internet are copies of the original posting at this page (see [[4]], which got transwiki'd elsewhere. If readers search for simult they will find the proper pages anyway, so this non-word redirect has no value but to confuse. Note that SIMULT is a key on a TI calculator for simultaneous equations. But that's different.) Coastside (talk) 05:21, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Skalmantas of Sudovia → Skomantas of Sudovia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. This originated from a bad series of moves/redirects that conflated two articles: Skomantas of Sudovia and Skalmantas (Gediminids). The two articles are unrelated. Conflating the two in a misspelled redirect just causes confusion. It even resulted in an unnecessary and spuriously entangled attempt at a disambiguation page to tease the two apart. Coastside (talk) 03:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.