Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 6

March 6

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 6, 2021.

ඞ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ඞ also looks similar to the Among Us character 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as is. The script that uses this character as part of it's alphabet is of greater long term significance than a passing resemblance to a character from among us in my opinion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. If understand correctly, the nom's point is that this letter from the Sinhalese script visually resembles a stylised representation of a playable character from the popular video game Among Us. Well, targets for "correct" meanings of redirects always have precedence over those that follow from visual similarities: that's why ツ doesn't point to Smiley and Ameria isn't a redirect to America. – Uanfala (talk) 23:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Some readers might even be from that place with the script. To them, this would be much more important than some video game. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snow keep. The nominator's reasoning is silly. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. This redirect is mentioned at the target, and there is no valid reason for deletion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 01:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fourth Coast

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 20#Fourth Coast

Sonnenaufgang

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While there is a chapter of Thus Spake Zarathustra called Sonnenaufgang, it is also just the German word for sunrise, and there are several other uses on Wikipedia. Unless evidence can be found demonstrating that the chapter in TSZ is the primary topic, deletion seems like the appropriate course of action. signed, Rosguill talk 20:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete – Obscure, marginal, possibly misleading. Unsurprisingly, it doesn't have any incoming links. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or change target to the translation Sunrise, but we are no dictionary. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to ‘Sunrise’ or delete, no strong preference. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete as vague --Lenticel (talk) 00:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as ambiguous. I oppose retargeting to Sunrise because there's no specific connection between sunrise and the German language so a German language redirect would not be appropriate in my view, per WP:RLOTE. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hubless hweel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hubless hweel → Centreless wheel  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This looks like a typo for hubless wheel. It's not something people are going to search for. 172.58.171.245 (talk) 15:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Implausible; we don't have hweel either. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It does average a couple of page views a month, so it doesn't seem to be a completely implausible typo to me. Also a google search for "hweel" will find it popping up in a couple of other places on the internet. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per 1234qwer1234qwer4. Only useful for poor typists and/or people who struggle with spelling. Rhythdybiau (talk) 18:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Space Marine Vindicator

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This should be the last 40K vehicle redirect. This is supposed to be pointing at a section of Vehicles of the Space Marines in Warhammer 40,000 which was deleted in 2011. There is no mention of the vindicator in the target article, but it does have a name drop in Space Marine (Warhammer 40,000) in a list of example vehicles. I propose retargeting there or deletion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fubbi Quantz

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fubbi Quantz → Eckankar  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Fubbi Quantz is not mentioned in Eckankar or in any other article. Leschnei (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete — kashmīrī TALK 13:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Appears to be a spiritual figure associated with the religion but not mentioned anywhere in the encyclopaedia. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sentinel (Warhammer 40,000)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another broken 40K vehicle redirect, this is supposed to be pointing at a section of Vehicles of the Imperial Guard in Warhammer 40,000 which was deleted in 2011. The sentinel does have a couple of name drops in Imperial Guard (Warhammer 40,000) as an example of a walker vehicle. I propose either retargeting there or deletion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Basilisk (Warhammer 40,000)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another 40K vehicle rediret, this is supposed to be pointing at a section of Vehicles of the Imperial Guard in Warhammer 40,000, which was deleted in 2011. No mention of the Basilisk at the target article and I couldn't find anywhere else to point it. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Griffon (Warhammer 40,000)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More broken 40K vehicle redirects, this is supposed to be pointing to a section of Vehicles of the Imperial Guard in Warhammer 40,000 which was deleted in 2011. I can't find any mention of this vehicle anywhere in the encyclopedia. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Creating List of winners of the Gold Medal, Senior Piobaireachd and Former Winners' MSR at the Argyllshire Gathering

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Created when fixing a page created in the wrong location. Thryduulf (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneously created under this title, moved six minutes after creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Creating Locomotive Services Ltd.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - clearly created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 21:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A web search for "Creating Locomotive Services" returns no results. Locomotive Services Ltd. was created a couple minutes later by the same user, so this seems to be created in error. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Creating 1977-78 United States network television schedule (Saturday morning)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 - clearly created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This implausible redirect was moved one minute after creation (in violation of WP:MOVEREDIRECT) instead of being CSDed; I propose deletion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Pointless, confusing, unhelpful. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Creating National Cabinet (Australia)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Thryduulf (talk) 21:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A web search for "Creating National Cabinet" returns no results, so this looks like an erroneous creation. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: I mean, I personally wouldn't call a redirect that was created ~11 months ago 'old'. I imagine that at the end of the day this is going to be SNOWy. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 14:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These could probably be WP:G6'd as "Deleting pages unambiguously created in error or in the incorrect namespace.". 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ItsPugle It's not recent either. I think normally the border is set to be 6 months. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ItsPugle and 1234qwer1234qwer4: there is no firm cutoff for R3, but "recently created" is almost always taken to end after a matter of weeks not months. Thryduulf (talk) 21:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of BattleTech characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's no list of characters in the targeted article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, because I'm already not editing the article anymore. Oh, and I created the redirect. -iaspostb□x 08:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, possibly G7 per above. No list in the article and I couldn't find an appropriate target in any of the other battletech articles. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 22:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no list of characters anywhere on Wikipedia. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Non-nutritive cereal varnish

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how useful this is. It's a redirect from a minor plot element, and this topic doesn't seem to be discussed anywhere on enwiki. Related to Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_August_17#Crunch_enhancer this August 2020 discussion that closed in delete for another redirect referring to this same fictional product. Hog Farm Talk 06:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Quitter (social network)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 09:32, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quitter (social network) → GNU social  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target or any other article, with the exception of citations. Having raised this at the target's talk page in December, there doesn't seem to be any interest in adding a mention to the target. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Quitter should be mentioned in the article but that is no reason to delete the redirect in the meantime. The situation about all the different versions of GNU Social is pretty complicated, messy, and not-well-documented in RS, so it's understandable that adding a mention wouldn't be the easiest. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 13:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Pretty clear case for deletion: if you're familiar with Quitter, you're probably familiar with GNU social and could find it on your own. If you're not, the redirect will just be confusing. --BDD (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per BDD. It would be disappointing to be seeking out specific information on Quitter and end up somewhere that does not have that information. -- Tavix (talk) 21:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per above. This seems misleading. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 07:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article doesn't mention Quitter so the redirect becomes confusing. It doesn't mention, as there seems to be little RS. Looks like a clear situation. – K4rolB (talk) 20:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kalininia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm Talk 19:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kalininia → Kaliningrad Oblast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. The edit summary for this redirect's creation, Possible redirect that matches the Baltic countries that all end with the sound "ia", doesn't seem like an adequate justification for creating this redirect in the absence of any evidence that this term is actually in use. Searching on Google Scholar, I found a few people that have this as a surname, but no references to Kaliningrad. signed, Rosguill talk 21:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please keep since it is a harmless redirect, I just think that it fits the "R with possibilities" tag but I do not know fully. Otherwise delete if other editors overwhelmingly insist in deleting it. PyroFloe (talk) 04:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unlikely redirect target to a non-existent political entity. Also not sure why it would redirect to Kaliningrad Oblast, instead of to the city of Kaliningrad, itself. Ejgreen77 (talk) 11:58, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_March_6&oldid=1138583296"