Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 24

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• BS Super Mario USA - World 1 → Super Mario Bros. 2#BS Super Mario USA Power Challenge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• BS Super Mario USA - World 2 → Super Mario Bros. 2#BS Super Mario USA Power Challenge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• BS Super Mario USA - World 3 → Super Mario Bros. 2#BS Super Mario USA Power Challenge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• BS Super Mario USA - World 4 → Super Mario Bros. 2#BS Super Mario USA Power Challenge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• BS Super Mario USA - World 5 → Super Mario Bros. 2#BS Super Mario USA Power Challenge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is no information about the specific worlds in the BS Super Mario USA game in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 22:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as WP:NOTWIKIA and WP:GAMECRUFT #7 (levels) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unless some particular area within a game has attracted disproportionate, notable attention, there's no reason to have these kinds of redirects. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Jill Alexander Essbaum. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 08:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hausfrau → Housewife  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:RFOREIGN -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Jill Alexander Essbaum since one of the author's most notable works (maybe notable enough to have its own article) has this title. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Jill Alexander Essbaum as suggested. If there are other notable media items, then it can be a dab with a wiktionary box. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:58, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Super Mario Bros.#Super Luigi Bros.. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:10, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Super luigi bros. → Super Mario Bros.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As much as I like Luigi, I also think that this {{R from incorrect name}} is rather unlikely. The target article is very notable for its actual name, and calling it by the redirect's name is incredibly unlikely. Also, when looking up the redirect using third party search engines, the only precise results that are returned are for an fan-made Flash game. Steel1943 (talk) 21:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No such game._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget to New Super Luigi U. It's the only game I can find that matches the "Super Luigi Bros." theme. List of Luigi video games also may be of interest. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refine to Super Mario Bros.#Super Luigi Bros. per the below. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Nominator comment: For the record, I oppose retargeting this to List of Luigi video games since I think readers who look up this title are looking for a specific game rather than a series of games. (I'm stating this since this opinion does not match my opinion about Super Luigi.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking more closely there actually is a Super Luigi Bros. It was a mirrored version of the orignsl game form NES Remix 2 which replaced Mario and there is also a section in the existing target article about this at Super Mario Bros.#Super Luigi Bros..--64.229.165.48 (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep since the game does exist and is mentioned in the target article. Or redirect it to NES Remix. PaulGS (talk) 03:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Nominator comment: Wow, it is mentioned at the target article. In that case, retarget to Super Mario Bros.#Super Luigi Bros.. Steel1943 (talk) 11:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Old Super Mario Bros. → Super Mario Bros.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Probably not a plausible search term. Many of the titles in the Super Mario series could be considered "old"; in other words, "old" is vague. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not a plausible redirect._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the original game may be old but I’ve never heard it called that.--64.229.165.48 (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The vague, unhelpful label "Old" makes this worth deleting. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is about as useful as Original Super Mario Bros. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was direct delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Super Mario Bros. (direct series) → Super Mario Bros.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unclear what "direct series" represents. Either way, the target article is not a series of any kind. Steel1943 (talk) 21:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - "Direct series"... direct to what? This doesn't seem helpful. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I think the searcher might be looking for List of Nintendo Direct presentations but it isn't grouped by Super Mario Bros. there so it isn't particularly useful to have a disambiguator. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo (Forerunner tech) → Halo (megastructure)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As the edit history for this redirect says, the disambiguation is "inherently meaningless". It has no reason to be a redirect. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:17, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as jargonistic WP:GAMECRUFT. More useful dabs would be Halo (megastructure) or Halo (superweapon) or Halo (space structure) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:53, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Body Manners → Utopia (Björk album)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this at the target page, no other likely targets showing either. Richhoncho (talk) 17:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator. No article on Wikipedia mentions anything by this name. Web searches show there's a book with this title, but neither the book nor its author appear to pass WP:N. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 11:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Mario Revolution → Super Mario Galaxy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I'm not able to locate any references that refer to Super Mario Galaxy as "Mario Revolution" or any variation of that phrase. The closed title match I could find with the redirect (in regards to existing subjects on Wikipedia) is Dance Dance Revolution Mario Mix. Steel1943 (talk) 16:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I'm guessing it refers to Nintendo Revolution AKA the development name of the Wii. But it doesn't make sense so, delete._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doing some digging with article histories the Wii name was officially announced before Galaxy was shown to the public meaning its highly unlikely that this was ever known as Mario Revolution.--64.229.165.48 (talk) 00:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Mario 7 → Super Mario Galaxy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per Super Mario#Games, it is unclear how the target has any connection with the number 7; it's not the 7th title in the series chronologically or otherwise. Steel1943 (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The redirect really doesn't make any sense... As you said, it's not the 7th. VibeScepter (talk) (contributions) 16:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete could just as easily referee to Mario Kart 7 or Mario Party 7.--64.229.165.48 (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mostly per Tavix, also noting the potentially nonstandard capitalization ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Boost Mode → PlayStation 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect seems like it's reaching in terms of vagueness. "Boost mode" can also be a trait of video game vehicles, or maybe real life ones for that matter. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Zxcvbnm, its true that it is vague but there is not much anything else on wikipedia to also claim this word so far.--Crossswords (talk) 01:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Boost%20Mode&title=Special%3ASearch&fulltext=1

• Comment Has Sony trademarked this term? It's discussed among Super Mario Bros. Wii U as a feature as well. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate to Push-to-pass, which is also referred to as boost mode; and Nitrous oxide engine, where you use nitrous injection systems for nitro boost or boost mode in illegal street racing -- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 05:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Neither of those articles MOS:DABMENTION "boost mode", so the disambiguation page would be cleaned up to be empty. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep unless/until other topics for "boost mode" get coverage on Wikipedia. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate Mentioned in New_Super_Mario_Bros._U, JHunterJ Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per tavix, there are too many possible meanings. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to reveal search results. The current target is unhelpful as there is no discussion of "boost mode" there (it's briefly mentioned at PlayStation 4 system software, but not enough to identify what it is/does). As pointed out above, a few games have a boost mode that's mentioned on Wikipedia, including: Slither.io, Guilty Gear Isuka, DoDonPachi DaiFukkatsu, etc. Other search results using Wikipedia's search feature include everything from hardware to vehicles to exhaust hoods. I can't see a disambiguation catching all this, as the uses don't really cover what disambiguations are for. We'd have to have a list of video games that have a boost mode, as well as several other extremely minor uses. With 35 results for "boost mode", it seems easier and more efficient to simply let the reader search. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 02:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 30-verti → Icosidodecahedron  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don’t think this polyhedron is known as a "30-verti". LaundryPizza03 (talk) 06:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - harmless. It's a polyhedron with 30 vertices, and a useful rhyme if someone finds it useful. There's little evidence of that, though: the redirect had 10 hits in the 90 days preceding the nomination. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• But it's not the only polyhedron with 30 vertices. Small icosihemidodecahedron is one example. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The name is accurate (if unspecific), but no one seems to use it. I would be persuaded to switch to a weak keep if some evidence that this name is used elsewhere is produced. Double sharp (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Tavix's observation/comment regarding the ambiguity of this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• W. Homer Axford → d:Q47462594  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Several days following my comments at Talk:W. Homer Axford without response, I'm posting this redirect here for discussion on the grounds that I see no reason to have a soft redirect to a Wikidata entry, something that appeared to be unique among articles in Category:Wikipedia interwiki soft redirects (though, since then, the same author has created 15 or so other of these, and it looks like he created one before this one). (Conversely, if we think this is valuable, would it make sense for someone to create a bot that will find all biographical entries at Wikidata that don't already have corresponding articles on Wikipedia and create soft redirects for them?) Largoplazo (talk) 12:53, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Created as one of a dozen choices for an open RFC on how to link to Wikidata for people that appear in Wikipedia charts, where the biographical data is too thin for a standalone article. The debate is at WP:MoS on the talk page. Wikidata uniquely identifies this person and would link to other Wikiprojects that may have more information, such as Wikimedia Commons. The Wikidata Q-number can also be used by external sources to uniquely identify him. VIAF links to our Wikidata system and the Library of Congress links to Wikidata from their image identification project at Flickr Commons. The urls listed at Wikidata for W. Homer Axford link to an image, and to his obituary in the New York Times and to him in the draft registration at Wikimedia Commons. If the amount of material grows, a full Wikipedia article can be started. --RAN (talk) 13:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:REDLINK since that's traditionally how promoting article creation happens here. Steel1943 (talk) 03:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The RfC over at MoS seems to be heading towards a consensus not to have soft redirects like this. This style also goes against our tradition of using redlinks to encourage article creation. Deryck C. 15:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Per AngusWOOF's work ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Game of Bones → Game of Thrones  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An xxx parody of Game of Thrones - The GOT article makes no mention of this so as such it seems rather pointless keeping, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 22:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment If there's a particular film company that produced this, and it has a list or a mention, it could redirect there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment maybe it can be directe to the film's director Lee Roy Myers's page? It seems that most of his filmography focuses in similar parodies. --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• the pageviews seems to suggest this is a frequently clicked on article so this could be readers searching for the movie or people searching "Game of" and then randomly clicking the article to investigate ? ... Either way it seems the redirect is being made use of so I agree with retargeting it (Again have no idea how to close RFDs so shall leave this to someone more clueful than myself). –Davey2010^Talk 16:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add but I'll also add Lees filmography, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:54, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the filmography table to Lee Roy Myers (which includes this title) so redirecting should now make sense to those not familiar with the porno or the guy himself, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)(updated 19:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC))[reply]

• Retarget to Bones (disambiguation) or Bone (disambiguation). There are several games nicknamed "bones", such as dominoes, or dice. There are also several games that use actual thrown bones called "bones" as well. -- 70.52.11.217 (talk) 05:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Bones is mentioned at Dominoes so I'd support retargetting there but personally I think redirecting to a disab wouldn't make much sense. –Davey2010^Talk 18:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Theoretically it could be its own DAB page for the alternative name for Bunnock and all the other WP:DABMENTIONs (David Donachie novel, Kitchen Casino episode, Mutt & Stuff episode, and the Game of Thrones parody, with Dominoes and Bone Game in "See also"). If someone else thinks it's a good idea, then I'll draft it, but I'm not convinced of it myself. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm drafting a dab for this given that none of the ones listed can really claim primary topic. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be arsed to strike everything but having looked at the dab I think this is the best thing for this - No doubt many editors over the years will retarget it anyway so to save the flaffing around I think a dab page is the best solution here. –Davey2010^Talk 20:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Bunnock? It seems to be an alternative name. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That seems more like a neologism phrase applied to bunnock or the Bone Game. bones games can redirect to Bones (disambiguation). It would need some secondary sources that call it a "game of bones" prior to GoT. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I stand corrected, there's a youtube video dated 2007 that used the phrase "the game of bones". [1] (GoT premiered 2011) but the phrase is probably now stylized Game of Bones because of the show. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Y'know, there are the books, and the book was released in 1996.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Dabify seems fine enough I guess Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Defunct → Discontinuation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Defunct has been a redirect to Wiktionary for most of its history. There's an article at Defunct (video game). Not sure what to is best to do here, but continuing to redirect to discontinuation is not appropriate. Plantdrew (talk) 19:50, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate There's no way it could redirect to the video game, per WP:ASTONISH. So, disambiguation seems like the best option._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  If readers are ASTONISHed to find that we're WP:NOT a dictionary, it's a good time to show them that. If the video game is the only encyclopedic topic by this name, it may be appropriate to have it at the base title (it's true we wouldn't want this redirecting there, since that would be unnecessary disambiguation). --BDD (talk) 20:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are also dozens of "List of defunct X" (airlines, restaurants, hotels), that would merit a disambiguation page._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, that would violate WP:PTM. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 19:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Move Defunct (video game) to Defunct. While "defunct" is a common word, it is also important to recognize that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. That being said, I would support a hatnote to the Wiktionary entry to catch those looking for the definition. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Move with hatnote to Wiktionary, per Tavix. It might be mildly astonishing to not be taken to a general-concept or even disambiguation page, but that's what hatnotes are for. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 13:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Well, most of the meanings of this word are too generic (and too dictionary-like) to try accommodating here, but at least one is specific and encyclopedic enough to enter into the equation: the computing one covered at Zombie process. Why not create a dab page? – Uanfala (talk) 22:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've just drafter one below the redirect: it contains two proper entries, a wiktionary link and a "see also" pointer to Category:Defunct, the portal to all things defunct. – Uanfala (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • That seems a bit more helpful than my proposal. I would support that. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:47, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate per Uanfala's draft. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 08:18, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate per Uanfala's draft. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DID 5 → Dance India Dance (season 5)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No sources to indicate that this is the common abbreviation for the show. No DID 2, DID 3, DID 4 either. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DID 5 is an abbreviation of fifth season of Indian dance reality television series Dance India Dance.

Just like:

Serial no	Show	abbreviation
1	Dance India Dance (season 1)	DID 1
2	Dance India Dance (season 2)	DID 2
3	Dance India Dance (season 3)	DID 3
4	Dance India Dance (season 4)	DID 4
5	Dance India Dance (season 5)	DID 5
6	Dance India Dance (season 6)	DID 6

But there is no separate article of these shows without Dance India Dance (season 5). All the shows are redirected into Dance India Dance, that's why there is no pages for DID 1, DID 2, DID 3, DID 4 & DID 6. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sishaykh (talk • contribs) 21:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and create the remaining redirects. Several reliable sources used on the main Dance India Dance page use the DID acronym, including The Indian Express ([2] [3]) and The Times of India. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 05:21, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Indian Express and India Times references only show they are called DID and DID L'il Masters. It does not show that the seasons are named DID 3. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DID 5 has been redirected to Dance India Dance (season 5) again and other pages have been created too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sishaykh (talk • contribs) 18:32, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're only making the issue worse with these neologisms WP:NOTNEO. Now you have to show references that each of the seasons are referred to as such. Please provide news articles showing use of DID 5 (and DID 1, DID 2, DID 3, DID 4) DID Season 4? Yes [4] but not DID 4. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep all. Dance India Dance does seem to be the primary topic of "DID number". [5] Unless somebody has another topic in mind that might compete for this acronym, it feels okay to have these redirects. Deryck C. 15:00, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Refine to Faith Hill#2011–2015: Unreleased studio album and Las Vegas Residency. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Illusion (Faith Hill album) → Faith Hill  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at Faith Hill discography, could find little reliable source coverage, my best bet is that it was never even released. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 22:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an error; "Illusion" is a song (and a single), not an album.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  22:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep / Refine target to Faith_Hill#2011–2015:_Unreleased_studio_album_and_Las_Vegas_Residency where it discusses the album including that it was named Illusion and the singles that ended up being unreleased. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:45, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Angus. There is a bit of discussion of the unreleased album there, so I feel a redirect is appropriate. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Planet Zebeth → Metroid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible redirect, "Zebeth" is a mistranslation of "Zebes" that nobody uses. Barely gets any hits - delete. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per Shoy's comment in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 May 13#Planet Zebeth regarding translations. Seems this is similar to the Final Fantasy VII Aeris/Aerith translation issues. Steel1943 (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• I still don't see why we now need redirects from every Engrish version of a word that was long since properly translated. "Aerith" is arguably a lot more significant as that is *literally* the Japanese translation of her name, and she is often still referred to as "Aerith" in the modern day. "Zebeth" is just a mistranslation and "Zebes" is the Japanese name, it hasn't been called "Zebeth" since the original Metroid._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep along the same lines as Shoy and Steel1943. This DuckDuckGo search shows that "Zebeth" is commonly used to refer to a certain fictional location in Metroid, even though some pages think that Zebeth is an alternative spelling for Zebes and others think that Zebeth and Zebes are two related entities in the same fictional universe...! (Also I closed the previous batch RfD that included this redirect, but I don't feel strongly about its outcome. In fact I forgot about it altogether until I started looking at this discussion.) Deryck C. 14:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, or technically, withdraw. I figured I may as well close this since the results would be same either way. Steel1943 (talk) 13:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Aurora (Sleeping Beauty) → Sleeping Beauty#Variants  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It seems that in only the Disney version of Sleeping Beauty is the Sleeping Beauty character named "Aurora". For that reason, I suggest retargeting this redirect to Aurora (Disney). Steel1943 (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Princess Aurora mentions another Aurora related to The Sleeping Beauty (ballet) by Tchaikovsky. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There's plenty of Aurora in The Sleeping Beauty (ballet), and that 1890 ballet came out several decades before Disney's 1959 film. She has no name in Perrault's story but her daughter is called "Aurore" – or L’Aurore (French for “The Dawn”) – if Princess Aurora is accurate. – wbm1058 (talk) 02:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As stated above, the identification of the character as "Aurora" took place many years before the Disney film was released. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Trump#Arts and entertainment. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 08:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Trump (comics) → List of Marvel Comics characters: T  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not point to anything in target PRehse (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - This may be a reasonable redirect to the comic series "The Unquotable Trump", being a title shortening. I'm not sure if that series is notable, though. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine to List_of_Marvel_Comics_characters:_T#Trump which has an entry. A hatnote to Donald Trump in popular culture#Comics can be added and expanded with entries like The Unquotable Trump [6] There's also a non-notable manhwa/webcomic series by Lee Chae Eun called Trump.[7] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC) updated 20:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• comment there's also a Trump's Titans comic book Argento Surfer (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine per AngusWOOF. feminist (talk) 16:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've turned this into a two dabs as neither of these has primary topic. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That dab would violate WP:INCOMPDAB since there is a "(comics)" disambiguator. To resolve this, Trump (comics) could redirect to a disambiguation page, most likely Trump. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Retarget to Trump (disambiguation) and add entries to comics section. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Trump (disambiguation) as {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Characters in the Metroid series#Etecoons and Dachora. Redirects are cheap, and there's some crufty history here. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Shinespark → Metroid  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the article. Unnecessary redirect - delete. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It is mentioned in Characters_in_the_Metroid_series#Etecoons_and_Dachora as some ability Samus learns but it isn't a key element ot the game to be mentioned in an article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Characters in the Metroid series#Etecoons and Dachora where someone would be able to find the most relevant information Wikipedia has on the ability. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Distilling the Shinespark down to "an ability taught by the animals in Super Metroid" would be misleading since it's an ability that can be used in many Metroid games. I think it's just better off deleted as only the Metroid Wiki could give an accurate idea of what it is._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 06:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 18:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Fusion Suit → Metroid Fusion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too vague to be a redirect. Should be deleted and let the search function do its job. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 03:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment it is mentioned in the video game's article, but I don't see the concept applied to other articles so would this be primary topic? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • When you consider Iron Man's Arc Reactor on his suit, I am not seeing Metroid Fusion being primary topic. I think it's best to delete as overly generic._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I also believe that this is too vague. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is discussed at the target so someone searching using the term can get an understanding of what it is. My search is dominated by Metroid so I believe it to be the primary topic for the term. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:19, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Plasma grenade → Covenant (Halo)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The concept of a plasma grenade is not unique to Halo. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, definitely too vague. They can be found in Warhammer 40,000, for example. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 14:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• United Nations Empire → Factions of Halo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Nowhere is "Empire" mentioned in the article with regards to the UNSC. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Referring to the United Nations as an imperial agent or otherwise using the term "empire" in reference to them is something out of the New World Order (conspiracy theory), and this exact term seems to be correlated enough... but I'm not sure. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no indication that it is ever referred to as this term and it can equally apply to any other fictionalized United Nations. In the unlikely event anyone searches for "United Nations Empire", I doubt they'd be expecting to find a Halo subarticle. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Page history suggests there's some desire to dabify, as Tavix hints might be possible one day, so no prejudice against this being reborn as such. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:27, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Flash clone → Factions of Halo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at all in target article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, yeah it's pretty vague. Flash cloning in the Halo sense is only mentioned briefly at Characters of Halo#Catherine Halsey, but that's too narrow to merit a redirect. There is an episode of The Flash (1990 TV series) where The Flash has an evil clone named Pollux. I've also seen a few hits for a software clone of Adobe Flash, but no discussion of it (AFAICT) on Wikipedia. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:11, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• The Eighth Wonder (film) → Simon Kinberg#Future projects  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Target section is no longer at the target, and the redirect is not mentioned in the target article at all. Failed WP:CRYSTAL. Steel1943 (talk) 03:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - The exact title 'The Eighth Wonder' is strongly associated with an Australian opera, which apparently has been broadcast as a tv-film although it's hard to find details. At the same time, though, the opera's page might be a stretch as a redirect choice. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the previous discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was remove redirect from category. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 08:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:Boarding schools in Darjeeling → Mount Hermon School  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Confusing cross-namespace redirect caused by the creation of a duplicate article in the category namespace. (The article about the school is correctly categorized in Category:Boarding schools in West Bengal and Category:Schools in Darjeeling district.) Delete. - Eureka Lott 03:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural close The redirect should be removed, the school added to this category, and then you can CFD it for being WP:SMALLCAT or WP:NARROWCAT or develop it into a useful category. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Maybe someday ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Beneath the Deep (film) → Andrzej Bartkowiak#Upcoming projects  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Beneath the Deep → Andrzej Bartkowiak#Upcoming projects  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Time to revisit these redirects. The target no longer contains information about this film, and the targeted section (via the previous RfD discussion) no longer exists. These redirects are now failed WP:CRYSTAL. Steel1943 (talk) 03:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the previous discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:13, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Dawen Under Heaven → Factions of Halo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No particular reason why this specific typo is a redirect. Dawen redirects to a singer. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - As far as I can see (not that familiar with the games, personally), the actual Dawn Under Heaven craft in the series' lore isn't that important of a story point. This is a typo as well... I'd rather that we just be rid of this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. as unopposed. Deryck C. 14:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Early Halo universe history → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems like an implausible redirect, and based on the pageviews not a very useful one. There's also nothing about the section it redirects to that is specifically "early", as it details the series' entire history. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - "Early" is pretty vague. It's not the place of Wikipedia to contain long, detailed summaries of fictional story-lines anyway, so I also support deletion. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete as unopposed. Deryck C. 14:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Halo Story Bible → Halo (series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article contains nothing re: the story bible of the games. Was created as fancruft before being redirected, but is unnecessary. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete the three remaining redirects. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:29, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Bowser Junior's Robot Reactor → Super Mario Galaxy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bowser Jr's Robot Reactor → Super Mario Galaxy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Honeyhive galaxy → Super Mario Galaxy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirects to Super Mario Galaxy (arbitrary break)

These redirects represent either stages/levels or quests/missions in Super Mario Galaxy. They are not mentioned in the target. Their subjects' existence on Wikipedia would be considered a WP:NOTWIKIA/WP:GAMEGUIDE violation. Steel1943 (talk) 14:43, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: After I started nominating some of these redirects, I noticed that most of these redirects were all created by the same editor ... who turned out to be a sockpuppet. However, these redirects were created before the master account was blocked/discovered, so these redirects aren't technically eligible for G5 speedy deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They seem G5 eligible to me since these are from 2014. The sockmaster account, Bambifan101~enwiki (talk · contribs), was blocked in 2008. I think you were looking at Bambifan101 (talk · contribs), which was created after SUL in 2015. I can run my script to get a list of all redirects created by MadisonGrundtvig and then batch-delete them. That should help figure out what, if any, is left to discuss. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tavix: Per your discovery, by all means, WP:G5 them. I think the only three that were not created by that sock are Bowser Junior's Robot Reactor, Bowser Jr's Robot Reactor and Honeyhive galaxy (lowercase "g"); the first two were created by LukeSurl and the last one by Junotoad. Steel1943 (talk) 17:47, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I got 534 results, and they can be found (for now) at User:Tavix/MadisonGrundtvig. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:08, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete everything that is left - Per WP:GAMEGUIDE. I agree that all the 534 deleted redirects previously are all implausible and should remain deleted._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:45, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Just to note, not all 534 redirects are related to this discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:55, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.