Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 21

December 21

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 21, 2017.

End stage liver disease

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • End stage liver diseaseCirrhosis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this term in the target article. PamD 23:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete vague at best. A stage four liver cancer can be considered at the end stage as well --Lenticel (talk) 00:11, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete page unnecessary. --Treetear (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flashforward (Literary/Cinematic Device)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible disambiguation. -- Tavix (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AngusWOOF: If you think that redirect should be created, feel free to create it. It doesn't have to be connected with the nominated redirect, which was created for a completely different purpose. -- Tavix (talk) 23:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I've changed my recommendation to Delete per nom. Very awkward dab modifier with caps, which is better explained with (narrative) as with Flashback. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 23:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GEneral aUGUsto PInocHet

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • GEneral aUGUsto PInocHetAugusto Pinochet  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete, due to the bizarre capitalization. -- Tavix (talk) 20:15, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lacépède (taxonomy)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 29#Lacépède (taxonomy)

WP:A11Y

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 07:33, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to have come out of the blue. Not related to WP:MADEUP, from which WP:A11 is derived. 108.210.216.40 (talk) 14:45, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Reasonably common abbreviation for accessibility in the context of computing [1], along the lines of the more-famous i18n (internationalization) and l10n (localisation). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 03:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the IP. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tallium

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Killiondude (talk) 06:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • TalliumThallium  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Dubius misspellin. Souns like “tally-um”, not “thale-ium”. Al Engish speakers now te differnce beween “t” an “th”. 108.210.216.40 (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as plausible for the vast majority of wikipedia readers who are not L1 speaker of English (the distinction between the two sounds is not present in most major languages). – Uanfala (talk) 14:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Seems to me that trying to second guess how people (or indeed peepal) will misspell a word sop we need redirects just in case is...well just nonsensical.Slatersteven (talk) 14:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, a reasonable mistake that I might have easily made. And the redirect has been stable since 2004 with no problems. Randy Kryn (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. As Uanfala says, for many non-native speakers these two words would be pronounced identically. Also, according to our own article on thallium, it's pronounced THAL-ee-um, so I'm not sure if I get nom's "thale-ium" point. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 03:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Uanfala. Double sharp (talk) 04:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sruthi Prakash

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:40, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sruthi PrakashShruti Marathe  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this name at the target article - no indication of any justification for the redirect. PamD 13:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Unsourced and not disclosed alternative name. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:33, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wedding dress of Meghan Markle

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 29#Wedding dress of Meghan Markle

Don't Waste My Time (Status Quo)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 December 29#Don't Waste My Time (Status Quo)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_21&oldid=1086346348"