Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 16

June 16

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 16, 2016.

Paříži

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Paříži → Paris  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Paříž → Paris  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN; the language I hit on was Czech. -- Tavix (talk) 20:58, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Already mapped to Czech Wikipedia. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

URESWNI

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • URESWNI → United Kingdom  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete as an obscure acronym. Searching this acronym on Google only gives me ~60 results, and it's not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. -- Tavix (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment As this redirect's creator I don't recall why I thought this would catch on. I'm a bit disappointed that URSWINE didn't take off either. / edg ☺ ☭ 04:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bản mẫu:Traffic law

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bản mẫu:Traffic law → Template:Traffic law  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

We don't use Vietnamese namespace names on English Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete likely typo in adding stuff from namespaces. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Axxter99/San religion navbox

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create subpages to the author's user name in the article namespace and redirect them to templates. Stefan2 (talk) 20:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete user error in creating the template. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Format: Reşiţa Demographics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Format: Reşiţa Demographics → Template:Reşiţa Demographics  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

We don't use Romanian namespace names on English Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete error in transferring template from Romanian Wikipedia. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Templates:Mayo Women's Football League teams

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: extra "s". Stefan2 (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tempate:Hong Kong Kwai Tsing Council Constituencies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing "l". Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Emplate:Current Top 10 WSA Rankings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing "t". Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template Dartford F.C.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing colon. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United Kingdoom

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • United Kingdoom → United Kingdom  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

While this is a misspelling, the use of the word "doom" might be bordering on WP:R#D3 territory due to it's negative connotations. -- Tavix (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tempate:Duffy-Electric Railways

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tempate:Duffy-Electric Railways → Template:Duffy-Electric Railways  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unexpected typo: missing "l". Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template Gribovsky aircraft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as uncontroversial housekeeping. Deryck C. 21:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected typo: missing colon. Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

HBWQ2016OG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • HBWQ2016OG → Template:HBWQ2016OG  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unnecessary cross-namespace redirect and unlikely search term (Wikipedia-invented acronym for "HandBall Women's Qualifiers for the 2016 Olympic Games, in case you were wondering). Target could also use a rename, but that's a separate issue.210.6.254.106 (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Confusing mainspace redirect at worst, WP:XNR at best. Steel1943 (talk) 15:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chief Justices of Commonwealth countries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chief Justices of Commonwealth countries → Template:Chief Justices of Commonwealth countries  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not sure. The template is the closest we have to a "list of Chief Justice positions of Commonwealth countries". We also have Chief Justice which includes a list. But one is an XNR and the other is not an exact topic match... Deryck C. 21:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. This is a viable topic for a standalone article, and hopefully a redlink will encourage article creation. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. In this case the template is the most useful target that we have for the searching user, so the cross namespace redirect is actually useful. If we really want an article, the closer should just copy the template, turn it into a list with the template at the bottom, and do a few wikifications. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. WP:XNR that probably qualifies for WP:REDLINK. Steel1943 (talk) 15:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Barry Bowden

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect must've been meant to link to a section on the player on that page (we use these pages to incubate biographies that are near but not yet notable per GNG). But there's nothing here on this individual as the player has been inactive since 2010. There's no reason to keep this redirect. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Useless redirect for a former minor leaguer. Penale52 (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stanford swimmer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stanford swimmer → People v. Turner  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete This redirect title is too vague. There are dozens of notable Stanford swimmers; to make it be specifically about this subject is WP:RECENTISM. There is already a redirect from "Stanford rapist", isn't that enough? MelanieN (talk) 18:52, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stanford rapist is a BLP problem since the rape charges against Brock were dropped. Him being known as a swimmer is not controversial though. Ranze (talk) 00:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (or re-target to Stanford Cardinal) - highly recentistic. Neutralitytalk 19:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep if you search this phrase it refers to this case. A dozen of our sources use this phrase to refer to Brock. No other swimmers from Stanford have this kind of notability associated with the phrase, try Googling it. If you know of anyone else knoen by the phrase well enough that is grounds for discussion of expanding into a disambiguation page but not deletion. Ranze (talk) 00:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete vague. Needs to be a more specific search like Stanford swimmer rape case. 02:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
    • bad logic, there is no rape case, the charges were quickly dropped. Ranze (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There are a number of famous Stanford alums who are well known for their accomplishments as swimmers (see, e.g., Tara Kirk, Susan von der Lippe, Mike Bruner, and Greg Buckingham). If the Stanford swim team had an article, then we should redirect readers there; anything else will likely WP:ASTONISH once this case is no longer front page news. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 02:08, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • if at some point Brock is no longer the top result then I would be all for redirecting this to what is, or making it a disambiguation page, but that is no reason to empty the space. Ranze (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, not reasonable to assume this term must refer to the criminal.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • why not? He is the top result if you search. By your logic it would not be reasonable to assume "pulse nightclub" refers to the Orlando location. After all I could be talking about the one in Oshawa. Ranze (talk) 08:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Europe/Luxembourg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus is that the current targets are inappropriate and that there is not an appropriate retargeting option available. I think it's reasonable that this consensus should apply to the other redirects currently at Category:Redirects from a tzid, so those will be taken care of also. -- Tavix (talk) 22:27, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Europe/Luxembourg → Luxembourg City  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Andorra → Andorra la Vella  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Chisinau → Chișinău  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Dublin → Dublin  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Gibraltar → Gibraltar  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Guernsey → Guernsey  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Isle of Man → Isle of Man  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Jersey → Jersey  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Mariehamn → Mariehamn  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Monaco → Monaco  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Nicosia → Nicosia  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Podgorica → Podgorica  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Prague → Prague  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/San Marino → San Marino  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Sarajevo → Sarajevo  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Skopje → Skopje  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Sofia → Sofia  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Skopje → Stockholm  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Tallinn → Tallinn  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Tirane → Tirana  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Vaduz → Vaduz  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Vatican → Vatican City  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Vienna → Vienna  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Vilnius → Vilnius  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • Europe/Zagreb → List of tz database time zones  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

What a can of worms! First, I just came across "Europe/Luxembourg". I thought this would be a very old link that just meant Luxembourg, but apparently it's a way of denoting a time zone. Now, with this notation, how does, say, Europe/Oslo differ from Europe/Amsterdam? And they from Central European Time?

It got worse when I investigated the matter further. So far, I've only looked at the European members of Category:Redirects from a tzid. Should these have their own articles, like the ones on Oslo and Amsterdam? Should they redirect to a list, like Zagreb does? Simply to the city they correspond to (I oppose this as unhelpful)? Relevant articles on time in that area? Or should we just delete the lot? --BDD (talk) 17:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Not sure right now, but either way, the nominated redirect seems eligible for WP:G5. Steel1943 (talk) 17:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) with me adding the additional entries. --BDD (talk) 18:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like all but 3 of them may qualify for WP:G5. Europe/Andorra and Europe/Zagreb were redirects created by the ban-evading sock that were converted to articles by a different editor, but were then reconverted to redirects. Europe/Nicosia was created by a different editor than the ban-evading sock. Steel1943 (talk) 18:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Name of Luxembourg

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 28#Name of Luxembourg

Buildings in Denmark timeline

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. This was created for a navbox. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jayme Mathias Rincão

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete most of the other managers are redlinked, it shouldn't redirect to the general template. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

April 27-30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • April 27-30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map → Template:April 27–30, 2014 tornado outbreak map  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Either a file or a template, but not an article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament - OQT Turin Group B table

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament - OQT Turin Group B table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Turin Group B table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Turin Group B table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Turin Group B table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament - OQT Turin Group A table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Turin Group A table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Turin Group A table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Turin Group A table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament - OQT Manila Group A table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Manila Group A table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Manila Group A table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Manila Group A table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Belgrade Group B table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Belgrade Group B table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament - OQT Manila Group B table → Template:2016 FIBA World Olympic Qualifying Tournament – OQT Manila Group B table  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: I've merged similar discussions. -- Tavix (talk) 01:31, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. Confusing and possibly misleading WP:XNRs. Steel1943 (talk) 15:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ademar Pimenta

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Managers without articles should be redlinked or not linked. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oklahoma City Barons roster

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#Oklahoma City Barons roster

April 27–30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Non-controversial maintenance to remove this page. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 19:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • April 27–30, 2014 tornado outbreak/Map → Template:April 27–30, 2014 tornado outbreak map  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:20, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Animation industry in the People's Republic of China

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Chinese animation. JohnCD (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Could maybe be retargeted to Chinese animation or something. Stefan2 (talk) 17:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anatomical terminology series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American University leaders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to List of American University people. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Al-Faisaly FC (Harmah) squad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to Al-Faisaly FC#Players. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support the refined target of Al-Faisaly FC#Players per Tavix below. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2016 in Chinese football

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2016 in Chinese football

2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B3

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B3 → Template:2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B3  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
  • 2015 Pan American Games women's water polo game B1 → Template:2015 Pan American Games women's water polo game B1  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: I've merged similar discussions. -- Tavix (talk) 01:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2015 Toyota Four Nations Cup Philippines men's basketball team roster

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2015 Toyota Four Nations Cup Philippines men's basketball team roster → Template:2015 Toyota Four Nations Cup Philippines men's basketball team roster  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2012 CECAFA Cup scorers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to 2012 CECAFA Cup statistics. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2012 CECAFA Cup scorers → Template:2012 CECAFA Cup scorers  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

See WP:R#D6. {{R with history}}, and retargeted in 2015. Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2010-11 in Egyptian football

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2010-11 in Egyptian football

2009 in Malaysian football

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#2009 in Malaysian football

1996-97 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:R#D6. Stefan2 (talk) 17:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: I've merged similar discussions. -- Tavix (talk) 01:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom.—Bagumba (talk) 01:50, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1974-75 in German football

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 29#1974-75 in German football

Adios Mother

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn/retarget to Long Island Iced Tea#Variations. Steel1943 (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of the redirect is not mentioned in the target article, so the connection is unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The section was deleted at some point. I added it back in. --evrik (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Works for me. I'm going to withdraw this. Steel1943 (talk) 17:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-Strike terms

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Counter-Strike terms → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It's unclear what "terms" refers to in the target article. The article has history as an article, but it seems to just be a list of Internet slang. Steel1943 (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No glossary in the article. Not a slang list. Not a dictionary. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-Strike culture

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect seems misleading since the subject of the redirect (as well as the word "culture") does not seem present in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but the history looks like annex sorry from Pubnoob. (Also currently nominated for RfD.) Steel1943 (talk) 15:41, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to Counter-Strike (series) since the culture surrounding CS is not about the original game, but the series as a whole. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • This option has the same concerns as listed in my opening sentence: [Retargeting the redirect to Counter-Strike (series)] seems misleading since the subject of the redirect (as well as the word "culture") does not seem present in [Counter-Strike (series)]. Steel1943 (talk) 17:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No discussion of a culture in any of the articles. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's a possible target at Cyberculture, but that might be a WP:SURPRISE given the phrase "Counter-Strike". Weak delete from me, per nom. --Izno (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-smack

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Counter-smack → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The term is not mentioned at the target. The redirect has history as an article, but the article looks like a combination of a WP:NOTWIKIA fail and Internet trolling. Steel1943 (talk) 15:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • So, Hoax? Prof. Mc (talk) 22:08, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 11:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Camper-strike

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Camper-strike → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per search engines, the subject of this redirect seems like a parody video game created in 2005 based on the target in name alone. Either way, the redirect is not mentioned at the target. Steel1943 (talk) 15:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • So, Hoax, like Counter-smack? Prof. Mc (talk) 22:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Someone should assess the (few) mentions in [1] to verify whether the noun is interesting. My gut, without review (since I'm at work) is a weak delete (but not a speedy). --Izno (talk) 11:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a slang dictionary for Counter-Strike. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Phoenix Connexion

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Phoenix Connexion → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect seems to not be mentioned or identified in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 15:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. If it has any meaning, that might be lost to the depths of time, since [2] returns nothing. --Izno (talk) 11:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Phoenix Connexion is one of the more memorable enemy models in the CS franchise [3]. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:REDLINK. If anyone can build an acceptable article about one of the most recognizable model sets in CS, they should be encouraged to do so as the current target provide no information. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dust2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:53, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dust2 → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but the article would probably fail WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 15:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:REDLINK to encourage page creation. This is the most famous map in CS, and likely has enough sources to support an article. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 17:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Patar knight, delete. --Izno (talk) 11:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not slang, not glossary, not wikia. Sounds more like a team name. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Female Counter-Strike

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Female Counter-Strike → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It's unclear what this redirect is supposed to identify. So, is there a "Male Counter-Strike"? Steel1943 (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete per unmentioned in article. That said, women in CS has reliable coverage. --Izno (talk) 11:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete more non-notable slang. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pubnoob

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pubnoob → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 15:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - One return on the VG/RS search and it's related to Dota 2... This is pure slang. --Izno (talk) 11:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as slang. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete game slang. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Counter-Strike Spray

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Counter-Strike Spray → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The subject of the redirect seems to not be mentioned in the target article. The redirect has history as an article, but it seems as though the article would fail WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 15:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I feel it necessary to point something out: There are two meanings to the word "spray" -- one as in the history of the article, and the other as in the in-game term which indicates an inability to control a continuously firing weapon. Both actually are represented in reliable sources, so I'm leery to delete this one based on NOTWIKIA. Not mentioned in the article seems a legitimate deletion rationale for now, but I think there's potential there for at least one if not both to show up in that article or others in the family of articles. Weak keep. --Izno (talk) 11:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete-- it's either slang, as per @Izno: or it's WP:NOTWIKIA. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable game slang / kind of like a list of special moves. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Awp delay

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Awp delay → Counter-Strike  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. Per the redirect's history as an article, it looks as though the article would have failed WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 13:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. --Izno (talk) 11:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete game guide, non-notable term. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1996 Port Adelaide Magpies premiership players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6. Jenks24 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1996–97 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2014–15 European Rugby Challenge Cup Pool 1 table

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2014–15 NBL season by team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:43, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2015 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to 2015 MLS Cup Playoffs#Bracket. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2015 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket → Template:2015 MLS Cup Playoff Bracket  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems to have been created in the article namespace by mistake and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support the refined target of 2015 MLS Cup Playoffs#Bracket suggested by Tavix below. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B2

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B2 → Template:2015 Pan American Games men's rugby sevens game B2  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems to have been created in the article namespace (possibly by mistake) and then moved to the template namespace. It's unexpected to find this template in the article namespace. Stefan2 (talk) 11:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bandy clubs from minor countries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bandy clubs from minor countries → Category:Bandy clubs  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Confusing redirect. The target deals with bandy clubs from all countries, not just 'minor'[clarification needed] countries. Stefan2 (talk) 11:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Nothing that qualifies what is a minor country. Is that even a term in that sport? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Antarctica in fiction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:42, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing cross-namespace redirect. I'd expect an article which discusses Antarctica, not a category. Stefan2 (talk) 11:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete to create redlink; I can see this being a potentially interesting article. I should also note that we have an article called Antarctica (novel). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 02:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. If there's critical and literary analysis, an article can be created, but I'm afraid it will end up more like a bunch of lists, of which the Category will already cover. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Buccaneers2015DraftPicks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a template which seems to be related to 2015 NFL Draft. I wouldn't expect a cross-namespace redirect here. A redirect to the article namespace could maybe be expected, but I don't know where. Stefan2 (talk) 11:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - the redirect is a result of a move that put the template into the correct namespace. There is no need for this redirect and there i sno viable target article. -- Whpq (talk) 13:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete technical WP:G6. Not a plausible search term. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as an implausible search term. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 03:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Code of Honor 3: Desperate Measures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any connection between the redirect title and its target. It's possible that the redirect title is a game which was or will be published in the specified year, but the redirect isn't useful as the category page doesn't mention this. Tagged {{R from move}}, but no page with this title has been moved to the category namespace. One page was moved to the draft namespace and later deleted, though. Stefan2 (talk) 11:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete it's either a notable game or it's not. Not strongly tied to the year released. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Matterfall

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 28#Matterfall

Canadian electoral calendar, 2017

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was article created. Thanks to 117Avenue for doing the legwork. -- Tavix (talk) 23:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected target. I'd expect a list article, like Canadian electoral calendar, 2016. Stefan2 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:CRYSTALHAMMER. Calendar articles have gone out to this year. Wait until actual events can be added. Leave it redlinked as with Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/Archives. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Create article. People like to talk about future elections, might as well have a list of them. If you want to bring down the crystal hammer, take a whack at the future election articles. 2017 will happen, and there will be elections in that year. 117Avenue (talk) 00:00, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Deletion at RfD doesn't prevent creation of an article with that title if someone has access to information to include in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Does the RfD prevent me from creating it now? If I do, it wouldn't be a redirect anymore. 117Avenue (talk) 03:09, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • It does not. Go for it, 117Avenue. It shouldn't be too hard with previous year's articles as a template. Once that happens, this would be an obvious keep. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canadian electoral calendar, 2018

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was article created by 117Avenue. JohnCD (talk) 11:14, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected target. I'd expect a list article, like Canadian electoral calendar, 2016. Stefan2 (talk) 11:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:CRYSTALHAMMER. Calendar articles have gone out to 2016. Leave it redlinked as with Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/Archives. Wait until actual events can be added. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Create article. People like to talk about future elections, might as well have a list of them. If you want to bring down the crystal hammer, take a whack at the future election articles. 2018 will happen, and there will be elections in that year. 117Avenue (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Deletion at RfD doesn't prevent creation of an article with that title if someone has access to information to include in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Access to information...like the three elections in the category that the redirect currently targets. Go for it, 117Avenue, make this a keep. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:32, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of A-League players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep as a list. Any request for deletion should now go toAfD. JohnCD (talk) 11:17, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected redirect. I'd expect a list article under this title, not a redirect to a category. This used to be a list article before this change. Stefan2 (talk) 11:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 15:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I turned it back into a list, keep as out of scope, and take the list to RFD AFD rather than deleting it by stealth please. Siuenti (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the list as a list and remove the redirect. GiantSnowman 07:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect There's a lot of issues with this list and I'm not sure if it's notability. The issues I can see are it's not up to date (content hasn't been updated since 2013 or 2014). It's not ordered by family names. I just don't see what it adds when the category and player pages tells the same thing. --SuperJew (talk) 06:18, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment my thoughts as original creator of this list. This list has gotten to a point where it is too long and out of date to ever be completed in its current form. There could/should be a page under this title which limits players included by a certain minimum number of A-League appearances obtained (see for example List of Premier League players), pending decision as to what the appropriate number should be (no A-League player has 300 appearances (as is used in the Premier League list) yet) (200 seems appropriate to me (for now at least)). I don't think a redirect is helpful here. Macosal (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Currently, a list of over-200 caps players will be 12 players, which is 2 more than the current table on the records page. Also I think that there's an issue that there aren't enough editors who will upkeep this. I can probably count on one hand the amount of editors currently active on A-League pages. --SuperJew (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • 12 right now, but likely to become over twenty within the next season (WP:CRYSTAL, I know - but if there were, say 20 or more, would your view change?). Such a list would also contain more detail than the records page list does. I don't think upkeep is an issue here - at minimum, this list would only require one update per season (and I would be more than happy to take an active role in creating/updating this page more regularly than that). But I do agree with you that the low editor number is a consideration in favour of reducing the current list which is far too lengthy to be maintained. Macosal (talk) 09:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep list. If deletion is sought, it's now in the hands of AfD. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

AI accelerator

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move List of AI accelerators to this title. JohnCD (talk) 21:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unexpected target. I'd expect to find an article about accelerators under this title, not a category. Stefan2 (talk) 11:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

information on AI accelerators is thin on the ground at the minute. I was thinking of Movidius VPU, Zeroth NPU, TrueNorth, google TPU (which wasn't even announced when I made the link) - and there's probably more to come. I would certainly agree it would make sense to see an AI accelerator article. How about linking to a glossary def in Glossary of computer hardware terms#AI accelerator? or what about a List of AI accelerators page to bridge the gap? Also at the minute there is no consensus on the 'collective noun'; vendors are trying to claim the space as their own and pushing their own terms; indeed there *are* differences in how they operate, which are better described in specific implementations. It mirrors the evolution of graphics hardware, where there were many accelerators and eventually everyone adopted Nidia's GPU as the "collective noun" (which originally, was a vendor-specific term). I think we should have a wikipedia article dealing with these accelerators under a neutral term before any one vendor claims the entire space. On another note, couldn't the wikimedia platform be extended to handle list-of/categories more seamlessly IMO when there is ambiguity about which to use it points to software features or options yet to be added.. I think glossaries,lists,categories could be unified, e.g. imagine if you had a 'micro article' template that specifies a trivial page is really intended to have its content added to a list, and if regular pages could also mark summary text). Such lists would then benefit from the ability of the software to sort (e.g. intersections) Fmadd (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to a mainspace page article if possible or delete. The creator has convinced me that this title qualifies for WP:REDLINK. At the same time, maybe deleting the category should be investigated as well. Steel1943 (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fmadd's recently created article should be AI accelerator. If it can be developed better with history of the term and have some examples instead of being a big list. Then Category:AI accelerators can then use that as the parent article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:33, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It's a bad redir anyway, the page content was 
    #redirect [[Category:AI accelerators]]
    and you can't make a redir to a cat page in that manner. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • i've fleshed out an prospective article for 'AI accelerators', which is currently sitting in the page List of AI accelerators, this could be moved into 'AI accelerator'. Someone else suggested just making it a redlink Fmadd (talk) 22:41, 17 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • Move "List of AI accelerators" to this page as suggested above. The topic appears notable. If another term becomes prevalent we can rename it. Sizeofint (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move List of AI accelerators to this page over redirect, since it's been created. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

History of Indermark

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • History of Indermark → Indermark  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A person has created the article and has repeatedly been reverted back to this redirect. Indermark, the redirect target, is an infobox and one sentence. Any "history" material can go on Indermak. Bgwhite (talk) 06:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete stub article about a village has no history to warrant a separate article and/or a redirect. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hovito

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hovito → Jay Z  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems like a WP:PTM since Jay Z has a song called "Hola' Hovito." There's another minor use of "Hovito:" a tribe in Indiana Jones. I think search results would be better here. -- Tavix (talk) 06:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Non notable in itself. Is it a significant tribe in the Indiana Jones stories? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Formation (album)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 23#Formation (album)

BEONCE

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • BEONCE → Beyoncé  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. WP:RCAPS combined with a typo makes this an obscure redirect. -- Tavix (talk) 05:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete redirect created by user whose only posts have been adding obscure and unsourced phrases about people with lots of spelling errors. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:19, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eslovênia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eslovênia → Slovenia  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN, the language I'm getting is Brazilian Portuguese. -- Tavix (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Run the World Tour

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 00:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chasewc91 tagged this with R3, which I undid because this redirect was not recently created. However, I agree that it is not a plausible search term. SSTflyer 04:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete no such tour. Or Redirect to Run_the_World_(Girls)#Live_performances but even then none of those promotional events were called Run the World. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:23, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Run_the_World_(Girls). Plausible search term given that it's a popular song, and as the lede to the proposed target says: "Beyoncé promoted "Run the World" with high-profile live performances..." ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:08, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no need of redirecting it to the song. Not gonna be a plausible search term. —IB [ Poke ] 10:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Beaded

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bead (disambiguation). -- Tavix (talk) 23:17, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Beaded → Beadwork  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems to be a bit of an WP:XY situation between Bead and Beadwork. Either delete or retarget to Wiktionary (wikt:beaded). Steel1943 (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment It's a coin toss. Beadwork involves more stitching and sewing, while there's beaded curtains, which are just curtains made of strings of beads. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:56, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Although it appears to be the situation in WP:XY, that essay is misleading as usually disambiguation pages or hatnotes are used (if the title can refer to any of multiple topics), or the redirect is pointed at one of the possible targets (where the topics are closely related and easily accessible from each other, as is the case here), only being deleted when multiple topics are mentioned in the title of the redirect (as in all of the examples). This redirect is more likely to be used by people looking for the adjective rather than the verb, so bead is a better redirect, but it may be better to disambiguate with bead and bead (woodworking) as the primary topic is less certain (either a separate disambiguation page or redirect to the existing one). Beadwork could be added, but I don't know how likely it is; it hasn't been added to the bead (disambiguation) page. Peter James (talk) 21:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget/disambiguate at Bead (disambiguation). Deryck C. 15:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big elvis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pete Vallee (and create Big Elvis). -- Tavix (talk) 23:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Big elvis → Steven Pressley  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Not finding any references of the redirect and the target having any citable connection. Unavoidable WP:SURPRISE because ... Elvis. Steel1943 (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was about to essentially withdraw this discussion with the "retarget" suggestion above, but then I remembered a concern I found while looking up the term "Big Elvis" on search engines. Of course, almost all results were about Elvis, so I wonder if this retarget would still cause a WP:SURPRISE issue. Either way, I now support the retarget to Pete Vallee option slightly over deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It could always be hatnoted to Elvis Presley since of course he's bigger than any Big Elvises. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Three month VfD policy

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus between deleting and retargeting to Wikipedia:VfD renomination limits. This will default to retarget as the alternative to deletion since no one wants it kept as it. -- Tavix (talk) 23:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia:Three month VfD policy → WP:Deletion policy  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete because it might cause confusion. The redirect was created in 2005, seemingly as part of a different policy discussion, WP:GNAA votes for deletion policy (marked inactive) which is the only incoming link to this redirect. The current target does not discuss the matter. Relevant pages, WP:Guide to deletion#Can I recreate an article that was deleted in the past?, WP:CSD#G5 and WP:Recreation of previously deleted pages, do not discuss three months and the latter is "failed" anyway. Sometimes a three-month waiting period is suggested (for example at DRV) but this is only on an ad hoc basis. Thincat (talk) 07:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget Wikipedia:VfD renomination limits, whither the project page originally at this title was moved. VfD renomination limits also contains discussion on "three-month". In general, we should point deprecated or unadopted project-space titles pointing to relevant {{historical}} project pages. Deryck C. 15:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. I was originally going to suggest "retarget to Wikipedia:VfD renomination limits" when I saw the redirect's edit history back on the day this redirect was nominated, but changed my mind after realizing how unhelpful that option would be for readers in "today's Wikipedia", given that the redirect's former target is a failed policy proposal for a WP:XFD forum that technically no longer exists. Steel1943 (talk) 16:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Etre

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix (talk) 23:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion established that it's not a good idea to redirect a french verb to an article on its conjugation. This originally targeted Romance copula, is that a better target or is it best to delete it? -- Tavix (talk) 04:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - they both actually target the section in French conjugation where this verb is conjugated. Also note the discussion link seems to be broken, I'm guessing because of all the collapses on the page. If you click through and end up on the bottom of the page, scroll up a bit to the discussion on redirects from various verb conjugations. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I think that discussion establised that it's not a good idea to redirect from the conjugated verb to an article on its conjugation, but these are both infinitive forms and match the section header at the article (French conjugation#Être). I think that makes them okay. I also think we could hatnote to the essay from the section in the conjugation article, as see-also or related reading. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The infinitives were also deleted: Vouloir, Avoir, Ouvrir, and Pouvoir. (Parler, Partir, and Avenir have other meanings). -- Tavix (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stewart Parnell

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Peanut Corporation of America. -- Tavix (talk) 22:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure what to do with this one. This was created a redirect to Peanut Corporation of America, as it is the name of one of the company's executives. A year and a half later, an IP retargeted it to its current target. There's absolutely no doubt that the Irish leader is primary topic over the peanut executive. But I don't think he was ever referred to solely by his middle and last names. A quick look at "stewart parnell" suggests the peanut executive might be sufficiently notable for a standalone article. For now, I would say retarget to the original article, Peanut Corporation of America, or delete. BDD (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Charles Stewart Parnell is undoubtedly the primary topic here and his name is well known. I looked at Google and saw quite a few results about the peanut executive, but unless someone creates an article on the executive then I think it should stay as it is. If someone does create an article, then maybe a disambig page would be more appropriate. st170etalk 14:44, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Does he go by Stewart though? That determines whether it should be the primary topic. If he doesn't, then the peanut guy should get the redirect and then hatnote to Charles AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a look through Google because I was convinced that some history books referred to him as Stewart Parnell, but in all the sources I've found on the news, Charles Stewart Parnell is always given his full name. Stewart Parnell has quite a lot of extensive coverage, albeit for all the wrong reasons so I think therefore that a retarget to Peanut Corporation of America is plausible with a hatnote to CSP. st170etalk 22:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete to reveal search results for the reader. Deryck C. 15:14, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 01:22, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support retarget to PCA and hatnote since CSP is usually referred to by the full name. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2017 Malaysia FAM Cup

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2017 Malaysia FAM Cup → Malaysia FAM League  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; there is no information about the 2017 event at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 01:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 15:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - lacking content, and per CRYSTAL. GiantSnowman 07:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2017 Major League Baseball draft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; there is no information about the 2017 event at the target article. -- Tavix (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:REDLINK to encourage article creation. Sources for this are starting to crop up now that the 2016 draft is done (see: [4], [5], etc.). ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Patar knight. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 03:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_16&oldid=1141906130"