Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 July 28

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by slakr. (non-admin closure) – Paine  10:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Ryan Beatty → Ryan Beatty  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:CNR; he has nothing to do with the Wikipedia namespace. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete housekeeping; this was moved to the wrong pagename by accident at the end of 2012 which ws corrected at the beginning of 2013 -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:20, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CNR. Rubbish computer 15:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete WP:G6 - botched page move. It was a declined AfC submission which was then moved anyway by a user called "Miller Public Relations". Anyway the history is intact so the redirect is pointless. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Tidal stream generator → Tidal stream generator  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Wikipedia namespace redirect to an article whose subject has nothing to do with Wikipedia --Richard Yin (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:XNR created for no discernable reason -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete That is horribly confusing. Rubbish computer 15:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC) I don't just mean that WP:IDONTLIKEIT, it unnecessarily creates confusion. Rubbish computer 15:13, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment:WP:CNR covers this. Rubbish computer 15:14, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:XNR per nom. Apparently created by a user who didn't understand how wikilinking works, but did understand how to create a redirect. Hrm. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 15:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Charya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University → Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible typo, but created as result of move so not WP:R3 Muhandes (talk) 20:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete:From an implausible typo. Rubbish computer 18:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted G6 by Verrai (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• GlassFrog (disambiguation) → GlassFrog International Aid Organization  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It doesn't appear that either the redirect page or the target was ever a disambiguation page, and a disambiguation page isn't needed, so I think this redirect should be deleted. Calathan (talk) 19:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is useless and confusing, so it should be canned per d2 and d5. – Paine  21:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. I've tagged a few of these over the last week as G6 with the rationale: "this redirect has a "(disambiguation)" qualifier and its target is not a disambiguation" and I haven't been declined yet. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per Tavix's point. Rubbish computer 14:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• First football game ever played → Football  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

If you're searching using this name, you're going to have a bad time. The article doesn't really address this, especially because there are so many codes and the evolution of the sport is such that you can't really pinpoint which game happened to be the "first" ever. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:XY mostly. In addition to nom's rationale, which football? If it was "first NFL game" or "first FIFA match" then we could probably find a target; "first football game" is just far too vague. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:40, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete extremely vague -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-Causes only confusion, fails to lead to anything like a target, gives the false impression that there is an article or section conclusively addressing this. Rubbish computer 14:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Ambiguous to which "football". No conclusive information on this anyhow.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 22:04, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete, G5. --BDD (talk) 17:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RFD#D8, implausible search terms created by a sockpuppet that seems to like creating junk redirects. Check out Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 May 17#John, Paul, George 'n Ringo for more details. G5 could apply here but I'd rather play it safe and take it here. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all and mass rollback the user's contribs. They are a banned user and not welcome to contribute here. I would tag all of these with {{db-sock}} but I'm busy at the moment. {{db-sock|TyrusThomas4lyf}} for anyone else who wants to. If any of these redirects are useful, another contributor will recreate them. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I totally would have done that, but it was much easier for me do it this way using {{rfd2}}. Besides, now we have a record of it and anyone who sees a plausible search term can identify it. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was 'delete. --BDD (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• The References of the Article Mahatma Gandhi → Mahatma Gandhi  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• References for the article Mahatma Gandhi → Mahatma Gandhi  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

For some reason, the references from Mahatma Gandhi were split out for a brief period in 2005. This redirect was left over from that. I don't see this as a likely search term and I don't think someone would want to search for just the references in the first place. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete references sections don't need redirects pointing to them. All articles are supposed to carry references sections at the end. Looks like a fork and rollback -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per 67.70.32.190's points. Rubbish computer 15:20, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Just Chilling (talk) 19:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Pokemon lyrics → Pokémon  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

We have a List of Pokémon theme songs, but it doesn't include lyrics, and it never should. BDD (talk) 15:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTLYRICS --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not there, and should not be per WP:NOTLYRICS. Rubbish computer 15:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Untitled Man of Steel sequel → Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete per WP:RFD#D2, confusing. This is an "untitled" redirect pointing to a project that has a title. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: That film originated as a Man of Steel sequel; but it is now a separate entity. Still, MoS actor Henry Cavill has stated that a sequel could happen, so this redirect may stay. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - it has a title. If Cavill is speculating on a sequel, it's trivia that fails WP:CRYSTAL, but a brief mention in the film's article is probably ok. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as implausible redirect because the target already has a title --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFD#D2 Rubbish computer 17:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Untitled New Edition Biopic → New Edition  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled NFL concussion film → Concussion (2015 film)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Muppet Project → A Muppets Christmas: Letters to Santa  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Mary Kom biopic → Mary Kom (film)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Marc Lawrence film → The Rewrite  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Marc Lawrence Project → The Rewrite  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Marc Lawrence/Hugh Grant Comedy → The Rewrite  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Lonely Island project → Conner4real  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Lindsay Lohan Project → Lindsay Lohan  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Untitled Lance Armstrong Biopic → The Program (2015 film)  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. These are all outdated redirects. The projects that these redirects refer to all have titles. They should be deleted as confusing because it might lead people to think they are referring to a separate, future untitled project. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - "untitled" redirects which don't point to works which are actually untitled are unhelpful and confusing to readers, and harmful to navigation. To save time, I have created User:Ivanvector/UntitledDelete, and I hereby authorize it to be inserted in any Rfd thread concerning "untitled" redirects for films and musical recordings. Use {{subst:User:Ivanvector/UntitledDelete}}. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFD#D2: confusing Rubbish computer 18:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Information that is either dated or will become dated. Entries starting with "Untitled" are generally not useful.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 07:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Just Chilling (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Eastern Republic of Kanto → Pokémon  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This started life as a WP:MADEUP history of Pokémon's Kanto region (Pokémon universe#Kanto), complete with descriptions of its politics and history. All entirely fabricated, however, along with the "Eastern Republic of Kanto" name, which does not appear in any Pokémon media. BDD (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as obscure synonym and also as non-notable fanwork. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MADEUP Rubbish computer 17:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft redirect. --BDD (talk) 13:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Party pooper → Party  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Party Pooper → Party  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The subject of the redirect is not described at its target article. Also, the redirect Party pooper was previously an article that doesn't seem like it would pass an WP:AFD discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak soft redirect to wikt:party pooper. I normally don't like doing that to random words, but I can see the value in doing it when there is potential for an article. In case someone wants to write an article on the subject in the future, there might be something salvageable from that previous article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak soft redirect to "wikt:party pooper" as Tarvix's rationale convinced me.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 06:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak soft redirect to Wikt:Party pooper, per above points Rubbish computer 17:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. A bit off-topic, but wet blanket, which I was checking in case of a possible retarget, is a DAB that has not only a {{wikt}} box for it but also an entry in the list as a soft redirect to Wiktionary: surely that can't be right? Si Trew (talk) 16:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. There's still not a very strong consensus here, but no one wanted it to remain as it was. Probably best to leave it red until the psychological aspects of hair are better discussed somewhere. --BDD (talk) 13:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Psychological significance of hair → Hair  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The article doesn't discuss the psychological significance of hair. The word "psychological" doesn't even appear in the article. Someone searching this would be disappointed. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:54, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as confusing. The closest entries that I could think of are Trichophagia and Trichotillomania which are psychological disorders that are related to hair. --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:31, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nicely done, I would never have thought of those. Si Trew (talk) 12:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. I am always amused that Schwarzkopf, a brand of hair dyes, literally translated means "blackhead". But then, that has little psychological significance except my own. Baldness perhaps would do, but even that's rather a stretch I think. We haven't Psychological significance of legs, Psychological significance of arms, and so on. We don't even have Psychological significance, whatever that would mean (some kind of case study I imagine that had statistical significance). Si Trew (talk) 11:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget to Hair loss#Psychological, which mentions psychological effects of hair loss. It's not quite an exact match. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:18, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Then should we create Psychological significance of hair loss? I get the idea, but I think it'd be a WP:SURPRISE because "hair" and "hair loss" are different concepts. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:47, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of agree they're different concepts, but I think that it might be more likely that someone typing this is looking for psychological effects of baldness, rather than hair itself. I would think that would be a more likely thing to look for information on. It's a weak !vote. I also don't really object to deletion. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak retarget to Hair loss#Psychological per Ivanvector. This is a very unlikely search term for anything though; redirects are cheap, but I wouldn't object to deletion. Sideways713 (talk) 15:17, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-There is no exact article for this to lead to; there could potentially be one through WP:REDLINK. Rubbish computer 15:10, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget (slightly) to Hair#Social role. If you were searching for this I suspect you'd either expect to find (A) something on the role hair plays in human identity, interpersonal relations, etc, which is sort of covered there and under the linked-to article Hairstyle, or (B) something on the meaning of hair in Jungian analysis and dream interpretation. I can't find a good target on Wikipedia related to sense (B) and possibly dream interpretation is considered too WP:FRINGE to cover in depth, but if such content did exist it would probably go in the article Hair right below "Social role" rather than meriting a separate article. Redirecting to a section a long way down the Hair article is more useful than just pointing to the top. Colapeninsula (talk) 11:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Template:Third-party. All transclusions of {{1stpartysources}} resolved prior to this change (there was only 1.) (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:1stpartysources → Template:Primary sources  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Template:Third-party. Primary sources and first-party sources are not synonymous, though there's often overlap. I'm starting the discussion rather than retargeting it myself because I'm not sure how common "first party" is anyway, and it may be deemed sufficiently opaque for deletion. --BDD (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Template:Third-party. Per Wiktionary's definition of first party and our article on Third-party sources. "This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject": The template means the article is in need of third party sources, and relies too much on first or second. While first and second sources differ greatly from third party sources, it makes sense to redirect this there in this case because of the templates usage and wording. In fact though this is a redirect, it might even be a better overall name for Template:Third-party.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Londýn → London  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not a Czech-language related topic. - TheChampionMan1234 04:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NOTDIC Wikipedia is not a translation dictionary. The topic is a native English language topic with no affinity for Czech -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per WP:RFOREIGN: redirect from a foreign language with no relation to the topic. Rubbish computer 15:00, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:34, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• IPhone availability, sales, and pricing → IPhone  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Per WP:NOPRICES. - TheChampionMan1234 00:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Rubbish computer 15:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget. This redirect should not be changed again without consensus. --BDD (talk) 13:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• EyePhone → IPhone  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Eye phone was deleted in 2007, Eye Phone never existed in the first place, this is implausible, (more so than the two mentioned above due to the fact that it is an combined word.) - TheChampionMan1234 00:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I nominated this a few months ago and the target was Attack of the Killer App. Since then, it was retargeted to iPhone by Sonic N800. I still think it should be deleted because it's vague. It could be a plot point of a single Futurama episode, a misspelling of iPhone, or "references to new technologies combining phones with something eye related" (see the previous RFD for examples). -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Attack of the Killer App. My previous rationale still applies: this is an exact match for the device that forms a central plot point of the Futurama episode, and if there is going to be a mobile comms device created which interfaces directly with the eye, it's highly unlikely that Apple's lawyers will allow it to be called "EyePhone". Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Attack of the Killer App, per above. Rubbish computer 15:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of egg dishes. --BDD (talk) 13:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Egg curry → Egg  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Egg Curry → Egg  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:REDLINK to encourage article creation. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to List of egg dishes where it is at least discussed. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:42, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of egg dishes#Egg dishes Rubbish computer 15:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to List of egg dishes.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Ägg → Egg  (links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per WP:RFOREIGN and WP:RFD#D8. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Eggs are known worldwide. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a translation dictionary -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 07:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Nothing on the Agg dabpage which uses an omelet umlaut, so not worth retargeting there either. 58.176.246.42 (talk) 08:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFOREIGN Rubbish computer 15:02, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:RFOREIGN.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.