Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFB (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. Disruptionpalooza. Star Mississippi 17:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Battle for BFB

This needs to be put deep in the ground. Resubmitted recently despite rejections and warnings. Analysis of sources provided show it will never meet WP:GNG. Mainspace already create-protected by WP:DEEPER. No longer useful for sock baiting. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 06:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Battle for Dream Island has been create protected indefinitely since April 2019. This would have been the same context that would go there.
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for BFB resulted in keep because of WP:NMFD, however, this was before it was tendentiously resubmitted.
Battle for Dream Island was deleted and salted on February 2022. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle for Dream Island

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 06:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I would like to keep this article, since this draft is well-detailed and have a lot of content just like any other article. Plus there are sources of this draft too, especially like multiple. The whole new reason of why I decided to choose to keep is because this media is very popular among the Internet Community and BFB spawned a lot of merch, including a book, licensed by Scholastic, which has a page on this site and is very famous and notable. -- 2601:205:C001:EA0:29C4:2554:6BDC:ECFB (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Not just the draft, I saw that this has a bunch of sources like the news article. This should have a page on this like, in order to make it similar to famous and iconic YouTubers. It is not that bad, it is just the fact that no primary or official secondary sources have reported this media on to the Internet. Let that sink in for a while. We should try to establish a consensus about this draft to be accepted. — 2600:1010:B12F:8241:4023:8412:3E31:EDA7 (talk) 07:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This IP was recently blocked for a year for block evasion. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and SALT as recurring rejected content. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and SALT per nom and UtherSRG. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 15:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and drown in an ocean’s worth of salt this is getting annoying. BFDI is like some sort of invasive species on WP at this point. Dronebogus (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally there are several user sandboxes that are essentially WP:FAKEARTICLEs for BFDI. Should those be deleted as well? Dronebogus (talk) 11:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think so, yes, but I don't think they need to be handled at this MFD. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to add related drafts like Draft:Cary and Michael Huang, Draft:Object show, and Draft:Inanimate Insanity (among others) to the deletion list. 27 is my favorite number. You can ask me why here. 21:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not nominate Inanimate Insanity because it’s insufficiently related. Just another non-notable fancruft draft that happens to be about the same genre of show. Dronebogus (talk) 13:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with Silver Nitrate. This is a zombie page that should have been killed. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.