Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 12

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 July 20. ✗plicit 03:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTCC logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 July 20. ✗plicit 03:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTC China Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Once again 001.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nicopieck (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused album cover, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Buffs (talk) 22:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oasis Academy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dootson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused and low-quality logo unsuitable for Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly PD logo, no reason to delete. Move to Commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buffs (talk • contribs)

I doubt Commons will accept the file as the logo is likely non-free in the United Kingdom. File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg is as simple as it gets, but British courts have ruled that it is copyrighted. Commons only accepts files that are free in both the U.S. and the country of origin. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ObviousCD1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Longyuano (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Inappropriate rational - its incomplete and the cover art is labelled "limited edition" so the other cover art in the article should be the primary one. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't have a preference for either artwork for several reasons, but if the rationale is incomplete, that's a deal-breaker. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pick one per NFCC. There isn't THAT much of a difference between the images and nothing special is shown in one and not the other. Buffs (talk) 22:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.