Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 December 27

< December 26	December 28 >

December 27

File:KylieJeNeSaisPasPourquoiCover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One Australian cover art is enough; this is an international cover art. The article is about the song itself, not the images. Since this image is not Australian, the singer's nationality, and the images are not well discussed by sources, this image must be deleted. George Ho (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The alternate cover passes WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 as stated on Template:Infobox album, "An alternate cover that is significantly different from the original and is widely distributed and/or replaces the original has generally been held to pass this criterion.", which could be logically used for singles. The current consensus for alternate images on album/single articles are that the alternate cover has to be significantly different from the original, widely distributed and/or replacing the original would pass the criteria for identification or an alternate image that is the subject of sourced critical commentary about the image would also be acceptable. This cover is significantly different from File:Je ne sais Australia.jpg, was widely distributed everywhere else in the world besides Australia, where the song charted better in the Finland, Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom than it did in Australia, and is the image most of the world would associate with the song. The alternate cover was the infobox image for three years until right before this FfD was started. Also there is a previous consensus at the talk page, Talk:Je ne sais pas pourquoi (Kylie Minogue song)#Fair use of alternate cover about using both images in the article. Aspects (talk) 08:56, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Guidelines on template pages etc. (and even local consensus) cannot override Foundation policy on fair use. Stifle (talk) 09:15, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dataflow.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overwritten file: two in one.

File uploaded by David Saks (talk · contribs): This appears to be an orphaned user photograph. Delete as out of scope.
File uploaded by Donttalkmuch18 (talk · contribs): This appears to be a copyright violation. Delete per c:COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. Stefan2 (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deepanshu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified person. Probably out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dej in Romania.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. c:File:Dej in Romania.png should be enough. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Denmark Tunisia Locator.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, incorrect. c:File:Denmark Tunisia Locator.png is better. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Protected duplicate images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. If the images are removed from use without breaking interfaces I'm happy to revisit this but work is needed before proceeding - Peripitus (Talk) 07:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Hello.This duplicate protected images.I hope delete one of the two images --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The number	image 1	image 2
1	File:Ambox move.png	File:Imbox move.png
2	File:Ambox notice.png	File:Imbox notice.png
3	File:Ambox content.png	File:Imbox content.png
4	File:Ambox protection.png	File:Imbox protection.png
5	File:Ambox style.png	File:Imbox style.png
6	File:Example-serious.jpg	File:Example.jpg
7	File:Ambox deletion.png	File:Imbox deletion.png

Would deletion of the dupes cause problems to an interface of some kind? --Stefan2 (talk) 22:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abc1993.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abc1993.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

This appears to be an orphaned unfree file. There is only a file but no file information page, and the title is blacklisted, so I can't create a file information page with the text {{subst:orfud}}. As the file currently violates WP:NFCC#7, the file should be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ASBeauvais.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is presumably unfree, but the textual file information page has somehow been lost. The file is unused, so if it is unfree, then the file violates WP:NFCC#7. Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture 470.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This should be deleted per WP:CSD#F8 as the file is available at c:File:High Bridge of Kentucky.jpg. The file information page has somehow been deleted and can't be recreated because the page title is on the title blacklist, so I can't tag the file with {{ncd}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ShelbyCorcoranStill.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file is claimed, in its initial upload and creation, to have already been through an FFD with a decision of "Keep", which is untrue. If an image is needed, there are free Menzel photos that could easily be used. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diagram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overwritten file: two in one.

File uploaded by Andersoj (talk · contribs): Unused, out of scope.
File uploaded by Davepryde (talk · contribs): Unused, out of scope. Missing licence. Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dn2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too small to be useful. Larger copies are available elsewhere, putting some doubt on the authorship claim. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.