Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Anjelica Huston/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Anjelica Huston

Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Anjelica Huston/archive1

Nominator(s): Leo Mercury (talk) 11:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With the success of Wednesday, I felt like it would be appropriate to nominate this for feature list status.Thankfully, the User:InternetArchiveBot started working again. Leo Mercury (talk) 11:25, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"For her Woody Allen-directed performances in the films" - "For her performances in the Woody Allen-directed films" would be slightly better IMO
"Lonesome Dove (1989), The Mists of Avalon (2001), and Medium (2008–2009), all of which were nominated at the Primetime Emmy Awards." => "Lonesome Dove (1989), The Mists of Avalon (2001), and Medium (2008–2009), for all of which she was nominated at the Primetime Emmy Awards."
Think that's it! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- All done! --Leo Mercury (talk) 09:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by FrB.TG

If she hasn't received any recognition as an author, I would leave that part out from the lead. Also, I would consolidate "director and producer" as "filmmaker".
Do we really need the one-sentence lead sentence to stand on its own as a paragraph? It can easily be merged with the second para.
"She also received acclaim for her portrayal of the Grand High Witch in Roald Dahl's film adaptation The Witches (1990)" - while the source does say her performance is known for its "vampy splendor", I don't think that necessarily counts as "critical acclaim". FrB.TG (talk) 17:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Leo Mercury (talk) 12:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720

Source review, spot checks not done. Version reviewed:

Ref 15: What makes Movie City News a high-quality source?

Image review:

No concerns.

Those are my thoughts. Please ping when the above is addressed. Z1720 (talk) 02:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- I've just changed the source to one from the Los Angeles Times. Thanks, Z1720 (talk · contribs)! --Leo Mercury (talk) 12:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support my concerns have been addressed above. Z1720 (talk) 14:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Birdienest81

All film titles, including partial titles, within article titles used for citations or references should be italicized .

--Birdienest81talk 08:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Birdienest81 (talk · contribs) --Leo Mercury (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support: That's all I have.

--Birdienest81talk 07:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.