- 2019–2021 Persian Gulf crisis (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)
I think that this article should be restarted and recreated because it was a legitimate crisis from 2019 to 2020. The rest after was synth and OR after March/April 2020. I think it should be recreated under the name 2019–2020 Iran–United States conflict/crisis or something like that Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 16:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: as the deleting admin, I will not weigh in too much, but I'm not sure deletion review is the right venue for this proposal. The consensus for deletion was evident and no debate as to the closure took place in its aftermath. Mausebru also does not provide any evidence as to why they think the deletion was procedurally flawed. It seems WP:DRVPURPOSE was not followed. Modussiccandi (talk) 16:55, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, so we should've just cleaned up the article. WP:TNT applies; The article was a legitimate crisis according to several sources, however, died out after 2020 by the same sources. It was just a dumping place for every little thing. We could've just deleted the section after 2020.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 17:11, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse - The appellant says that the article was wrongly deleted and should have had a cleanup instead, so they are properly at Deletion Review, and they have a right to say that the closer made an error. I disagree, and think that the close was correct. The appellant is entitled to submit a draft for review, or to create another article subject to another AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse essentially entirely per Robert McClenon. Jclemens (talk) 00:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The close was fine. The automated "cleanup" afterwards was an unmitigated disaster. Please be more careful. —Cryptic 00:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|