User talk:Mausebru

Hi Mausebru! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 20:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

César Hinostroza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not allowed to blank a page. This redirect should be deleted, by I do not know hw to define the reason.Xx236 (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC) I tried to delete the redirect as I was to make a draft and eventually, an article. Mausebru (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Kerner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Jersey dispute See: https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1432583/france-boats-leave-jersey-map-uk-brexit-fishing-row-eu-latest-royal-navy-standoff Ecrusized (talk) 12:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And: https://twitter.com/AFP/status/1390286148329746432 Ecrusized (talk) 12:58, 6 May 2021 (UTC) Ok, thanks. Mausebru (talk) 12:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC) 2021 Jersey Dispute[reply]

Don't intentionally create second accounts to give the illusion of support, as you did here. It's an extremely undesirable practice that can lead to you being blocked. --- Possibly (talk) 18:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know it was bad. I will not do it again. Thanks for the alert. Mausebru (talk) 18:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not bad, it's extremely bad.--- Possibly (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Mausebru (talk) 18:18, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the relevant text at WP:SOCK, which you should read: "The general rule is one editor, one account. Do not use multiple accounts to mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt; to create the illusion of greater support for a position..."--- Possibly (talk) 18:19, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought you meant with the telling people about the AfD. My mistakes Mausebru (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Egyptian involvement in the Syrian civil war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Mikehawk10 (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you put egypt under “Supported by:”? Egypt wasn’t a direct belligerent of the war Ridax2020 (talk) 16:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hehe ~~~ DoctorSpeed ✉️ ✨ 01:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Loona. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Appearances in variety shows doesn't guarantee notability separate from the group. Also, the "single album" or mini-album was part of the Loona promotions where every member got their own single album. This is not separate notability either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chuu (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chuu (singer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wagner Group.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru,

Thank you for creating Belligerents in the Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Could you please point out which sources discuss the belligerents as a list or as a whole? I understand that there are sources supporting the presence of each individual element, but where are they discussed as a whole? Thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 08:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belligerents in the Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belligerents in the Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 07:39, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru, I would advise you source your edits that support your claims over your additions to the article. There is a reason I removed a lot of it because it contains Original research. I'd advise you to read this article especially the section about SYNTH. Also, a lot of your sourced additions for instance about Armenia/Artsakh and Poland fall under the latter. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes I am working on it right now, so if its not there yet, then I am working on it. Expect it to be there in 3 hours. I have to do other stuff to, but thnks.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 15:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read what I linked to you here. A lot of your claims can't be supported by reliable sources. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:02, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did already. And yes, like probably half my claims or a bit less fall under that category. But I am still working on it. Right now for me its 6:21 pm and i have work tommorrow at 4 am. SO i wont be able to edit that much tommorrow.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 21:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's clear you haven't as you're still adding OR. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem. So how was I adding OR. I have sources to prove it. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also I just read that OR link and most of that material, even that belligerency page is not(mostly not) SYNTH. Also don't delete that page i spent countless hours find sources and reading verafibility Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your disruptive behavior on this article. You are clearly going to get a topic ban, a block, or both. I have tried as have other editors to explain to how to be better at editing. But are refusing to listen. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a great benefit to you to respond to the ANI about your behavior. And I advise you to respond in a respectful tone since your behavior is getting more and more out of hand. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This is good information, but User:Bkissin is right that it is odd to combine Egypt's Syrian and Libyan policies in one article. I recommend adding this information to Egypt–Syria relations and Egypt–Libya relations. Another option would be to create two new articles, like Turkish military intervention in the Second Libyan Civil War and Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Egyptian involvement in the Syrian civil war and Second Libyan Civil War and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Egyptian involvement in the Syrian civil war and Second Libyan Civil War, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 09:42, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian involvement in the Second Libyan Civil War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian involvement in the Syrian Civil War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 00:28, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of AK Parti.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Mausebru/sandbox/Nation Chat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But why its my sandbox. I could theoretically do what i want. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 00:04, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cenepa War into Draft:History of Peru under Alberto Fujimori. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:52, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lyons Road, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:History of Peru under Alberto Fujimori. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Josh A, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JBchrch talk 03:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Josh A rapper.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you continue to assert your edits don't count as synth. You haven't provided any sources that can support your edits or claims just as in the afd about your Belligerents in the Iran-Saudi Proxy Conflict article. And you're recreating another draft with the same content. I've undone your revert of my edit. If you revert it again and continue to add synth and OR, I will have to take it to ANI. Please stop. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: https://www.arabnews.com/node/1801096/middle-east, https://financialtribune.com/articles/national/104599/qatari-emir-calls-for-promotion-of-ties, https://www.historytoday.com/archive/feature/iran-and-%E2%80%98old-enemy%E2%80%99, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/07/15/uk-greenlighting-arms-sales-saudi-arabia-again-thats-travesty, https://ahvalnews.com/iran-turkey/ankara-tehran-relations-faced-many-obstacles-analyst, https://jcpa.org/article/tension-mounts-between-iran-and-mauritania/, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-10/02/c_134680532.htm, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-crisis-turkey-and-saudi-arabia-shock-western-countries-by-supporting-antiassad-jihadists-10242747.html, https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Gaddafi-support-Iran-in-the-Iraq-Iran-War, https://www.frbiu.com/articles/former-revolutionary-guards-minister-gaddafi-supplied-iran-with-missiles-asked-to-target-saudi-arabia, and more. Nothing i add is synth. (except that draft. Also, stop looking over my edits like a weirdo.)Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 20:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peru–Ecuador relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FU, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Egyptian Intervention in the Syrian civil war, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peru–Ecuador relations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:History of Peru under Alberto Fujimori may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, I noticed that you made a new image for the Peruvian crisis article (the one in the Spanish Wikipedia is really outdated). I am also peruvian, so I'm naturally interesting in this. I think the image looks very nice, although there are some things that... I find a bit off. Why is the San Miguel del Ene attack included? I don't want to sound disrespectful, but that wasn't that important in the grand scheme of things. Its size and positioning makes it seems like it was something really important for the campaign. If you wanted to portrait the polarization of the 2021 campaign, just one image of Castillo (and Keiko) protesters would have worked fine, although that was not very transcendental either. Also, I personally thing it would look better if events were placed chronologicaly, but that's just me. My main complain is the San Miguel event, maybe it could be replaced with something related to Merino or Castillo? Let me know what you think - Tintero21 (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Alberto Fujimori. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Much of this is covered in Alberto Fujimori and the main articles linked in there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:History of Peru under Alberto Fujimori and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:History of Peru under Alberto Fujimori, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 07:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lyons Road".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict to Draft:Iran–United States proxy conflict. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 20:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Responsibility for the September 11 attacks into Draft:Iran–United States proxy conflict. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did attribute when I copied. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 15:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Egypt–Turkey proxy conflict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Transitional Government of Peru, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

It seems to me that all of this is covered in existing articles, especially Iran–United States relations and Iran–United States relations after 1979.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iran–United States proxy conflict and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iran–United States proxy conflict, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 08:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Egypt–Turkey proxy conflict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Iran–United States proxy conflict has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A completely fabricated creation consisting nothing but OR and SYNTH alleging such conflict between Iran and the United States. Not a single source backs up such a conflict because it does not exist. This is taking material from Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict and Iran–Israel proxy conflict articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is it synth or OR? I have sources to back this up. Categories exist, tooMausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 23:10, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iran–United States proxy conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran–United States proxy conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egyptian involvement in the Syrian Civil War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egyptian involvement in the Syrian Civil War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sakiv (talk) 17:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transitional Government of Peru".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Izala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Liwa Fatemiyoun.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is to inform you that you are subject to a report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Regards, Pahlevun (talk) 12:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Costa Verde Beach Circuit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This topic is defintely controversial. Therefore, it is best if the blanks in the timeline are filled up and cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Russia–United States proxy conflict and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Russia–United States proxy conflict, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 03:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Universitaria Avenue (Lima), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I used article wizard to make it a draft. Must have been a glitch. Thanks for letting me knowMausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 19:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Universitaria Avenue (Lima). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Universitaria Avenue (Lima), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 08:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Costa Verde Beach Circuit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Costa Verde Beach Circuit, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 01:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of Peru under Alberto Fujimori, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mausebru, you recently created Syrian Hezbollah, I notice that all the content is covered by the article Hezbollah involvement in the Syrian civil war, I suggest a merge and adding any new content to the older page. Geopony (talk) 20:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of Peru under Alberto Fujimori".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2020 Iran gasoline export to Venezuela into Draft:Iran–United States conflict. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 20:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Husseiniyoun Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very good map I would suggest some changes though, Morocco has control on 2/3 of Western Sahara and you should also add Kosovo or Saudi side since Kosovo has been recognised by Saudia Arabia and not by Iran https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_Kosovo . Overall the map is very good! S.G ReDark (talk) 00:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Husseiniyoun Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HarakatAbdal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PopularBahrain.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Saraya Thair Allah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jihad Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Draft:2019–2020 Iran–United States conflict has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Diannaa (talk) 22:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Draft:2019–2020 Iran–United States conflict has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Diannaa (talk) 22:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was not an exact copy. The article in mention only had certain copied parts. The article that was deleted was because of the 'it was never gonna end'Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 22:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocking you indefinitely and deleting your draft. We have explained to you five times on this talk page that when you copy from one Wikipedia article to another, attribution is required. You have failed to supply the required attribution in your newly recreated Draft:2019–2020 Iran–United States conflict. Some of the content also appears in the deleted article 2019–2021 Persian Gulf crisis (I already explained to you why it's not okay to copy from there) and you state in an edit summary that you copied some of it from Fandom. The Fandom article is actually an unattributed copy of our article, copied there in 2021 by a banned Wikipedia editor (user:Reguyla). Regardless, Fandom is not a reliable source, because it's a wiki. And even if it was a reliable source, if you copy from there, you have to provide attribution, as required by the terms of their license. Since you seem to not understand how to contribute productively to Wikipedia without violating the terms of our license, I am blocking you from editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 13:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mausebru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok I'll stop. I didn't even know I was copying from a dead article. I was copying from elsewhere. I attributed in the edit summary to numerous articles and a source. I'll stop. Is there a way to just make the draft without the attribution whatever thingy? I won't recreate it until thi is resolved. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 13:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You still don't seem to understand the issues involved. Please read the linked policies on your talk page. Once you understand the issues involved, make a new unblock request that demonstrates this understanding. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Diannaa (talk · contribs) Look. I don't want to get angry. I have good faith. I'm not trying to harm wikipedia. When you unblock me, can we resolve things peacefully?Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 14:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Please. Could it even be 2 days or something. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 15:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mausebru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok. I'll refrain from making any edits relating to that draft or concerning that draft. I will work something else that does not include recreating it. I have understood everything. Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Per the discussion below, you have now read and understand about our licensing and its related attribution requirement. Note I will be monitoring your contributions. — Diannaa (talk) 16:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mausebru. Here are some questions to test your understanding of attribution as required by the terms of our license.

• How is Wikipedia licensed?
• Please explain in your own words how to provide attribution when copying from one Wikipedia article to another.
• Please explain in your own words how to provide attribution when copying from Fandom. — Diannaa (talk) 12:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To copy from Wikipedia and to provide attribution, you must link the article in the edit description, alongside the author (aka User:Example). This is because of licensing and other reasons. For Fandom, link the article plus the author (if applicable). This is also due to copyright. Wikipedia is also licensed in a way in which you must provide attribution to the author of text. (Don't know much about licensing) Diannaa (talk · contribs) Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 01:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa (talk · contribs) I have specified that I understand and comprehend the following. Now could you please unblock me? Regards--Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 03:14, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do some more research. I don't think you understand just yet what to do or why we do it.

• Your answer about how Wikipedia is licensed is incomplete. "Licensing and other reasons" doesn't explain why attribution is required. (It's a requirement of our specific licenses). Please specify what licenses Wikipedia is released under (this information should be easy for you to find as the licenses are listed on every page), and read up about our licenses.
• Your answer about Fandom is incorrect. It's not done via the edit summary. Please see Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Copying material from free sources for information on how to properly provide attribution for licensed material copied from somewhere else.
• I would like you to provide me with an example of the exact edit summary you might use when copying within Wikipedia. Keep in mind that most articles have multiple authors, not one sole author. Some have hundreds of contributors. How is this handled in the edit summary?
• Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 14:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so copying from a 'free source' requires a template depending from the licensing of the source. For Wikipedia's license, it is released under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, which requires attribution. An example would be Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution. Here Diannaa (talk · contribs)Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 16:20, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This answer shows that you have now read and understand a little more about our licensing, and understand attribution as it applies to Wikipedia editing. I have unblocked your account and will be monitoring your contributions. — Diannaa (talk) 16:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try to use and apply these.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 16:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are working on Draft:Iran–United States conflict where you have performed 32 edits today, almost all of which are unattributed copying from other Wikipedia articles in violation of the terms of our license. I am undoing your edits and re-blocking your account, as you do not appear to understand what to do to properly attribute when copying within Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, use the unblock template: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 21:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mausebru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok unblock me so I can redo with attribution. I forgot because I was hurried. Please, they were not copyright violations.

Decline reason:

I suggest you take the standard offer and wait 6 months, before re-applying to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Diannaa (talk · contribs) Please unblock me, I can redo the edits with attributionMausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 21:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You already said you understood and would do it properly, and then immediately resumed the unattributed copying. Nothing appears to have changed. I have no reason to trust you again, or to believe you will change. — Diannaa (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please I actually promise (with trust) to attribute my edits once I'm unblocked. I have knowledge of licensing. Please, I was hurried. I had massive stuff to do. Please, you can trust me. I don't want to be banned or blocked without end Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 21:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa (talk · contribs), please. I promise on my life that I will attribute all the articles. please. I can't risk getting blocked. I'm sorry for doing anything Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 21:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I pleadMausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 22:10, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mausebru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please, I can't go 6 months. I will abide by the rest of terms. Is either 1 month or two ok for a deal. I can't go that long. I will promise.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 22:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Attempting to negotiate this into a time-limited block is missing the point – we want to see that you actually understand the issues that led to the initial block. Unfortunately, it became a lot harder to convincingly demonstrate that understanding when you immediately went back to copying without attribution after making similar commitments in your initial unblock request. So yes, it will be more challenging to appeal this second block, because if it didn't work the first time around, how can we be confident that it will work this time? Your best chance of success is to take some time to review guidelines like WP:Copying within Wikipedia and others linked above. Don't just read them for the purposes of trying to get unblocked; your edits to date have created real issues with licensing and attribution requirements that many other editors have had to spend time fixing. The suggestion of the standard offer is not a requirement that you must wait six months before appealing, but the idea behind it is that if you take some time to reflect on the issues with your edits and formulate a good unblock request, it will make for a far more convincing appeal than an immediate request like this one which does not actually address the issues at hand. DanCherek (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mausebru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok I will promise not to edit unattributed and will try and do my best to contribute in a good manner to Wikipedia. I promise on my life. Please. I will try my best and give my effort to abide to the rules.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 03:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't want or need you to "promise on your life"; that's a bit dramatic. But I'm not seeing evidence here that you understand the issues. I strongly advise you to not request unblock again until at least March or April. Doing it sooner just wastes everyone's(including you) time. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huaylas Avenue, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Universitaria Avenue (Lima), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Josh A, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PhilKnight (talk · contribs) Diannaa (talk · contribs) Extraordinary Writ (talk · contribs) I have seen the investigation into me for sock. Enxivity has insulted me. I am not associated to him. He is a vandal.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 23:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Huaylas Avenue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Universitaria Avenue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:08, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User evaded their block and attempted to mislead us about it. See for example, User talk:European Inca. --Yamla (talk) 11:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, this user has now violated WP:3X so is considered banned by the community. --Yamla (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was only Epuma. No one else.Mausebru the Peruvian (talk, contibs) 12:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody's going to buy that. --Yamla (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Costa Verde Beach Circuit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Egypt–Turkey proxy conflict".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of members of the Axis of Resistance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of members of the Axis of Resistance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Popular Mobilization Forces has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mausebru. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belligerents in the Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of AK Parti.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]