Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 29

< December 28 December 30 >

December 29

Category:People from Alford, Massachusetts

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT. More appropriate to merge to county-level and town cat. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:14, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sportspeople from Newburyport, Massachusetts

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 6#Category:Sportspeople from Newburyport, Massachusetts

Category:Imperialist works

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Imperialist works (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Unlike Category:Works about imperialism, I cannot see a common thread joining these works, ranging from Left Behind to "What Russia Should Do with Ukraine". –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete by lack of clear inclusion criteria. Surely this is not for works by advocates of imperialism. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:54, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the arguments by the nominator and Marcocapelle. Also, it might violate NPOV, as it looks like the person was using it to say the literature in the category was done by imperialists, where imperialists are bad (not disagreeing that may were, such as Hitler since Mein Kampf is listed, but that becomes a judgment). Aboutmovies (talk) 22:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Institutions run by Maharashtra Education Society

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match #Category:Institutions run by Mata Amritanandamayi Math below, as well as others such as Category:Deccan Education Society. This is the only remaining "Institutions run by" category.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 11:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename to avoid unusual "run by" expression. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People educated at Ysgol Calon Cymru

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Single-entry alumni category for a high school. As always, this would be fine if there were five or ten people to file here, but it's not warranted as a WP:SMALLCAT for just one person. Bearcat (talk) 03:31, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I agree with this nomination. I am not able to find anyone else on Wikipedia that has this school on their page. Threevian (talk) 03:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the 'unless' clause of WP:SMALLCAT. I found another 2 from earlier versions of the school. It's not clear why this one has been singled out from Category:People educated by school in Wales, where several have only 1. Oculi (talk) 02:26, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Because I found this while working from the list of uncategorized categories, not from a category. Bearcat (talk) 14:58, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Now has 3 members
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Institutions run by Mata Amritanandamayi Math

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Institutions run by Mata Amritanandamayi Math (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization by association with an individual person. Bearcat (talk) 04:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:54, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd done the 2 in subcategory this morning after its discussion closed, then found more where the article was in both parent and (university) child categories. Since there were only a few to start, that effectively emptied it.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Major League Soccer MVP award winners

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:27, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Major League Soccer MVP award winners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Redundant to Category:Major League Soccer MVPs‎, an existing category. SounderBruce 09:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's right. Category:Major League Soccer MVP award winners and Category:Major League Soccer MVPs are same category about MLS MVP winners.
Category name of Category:Major League Soccer MVPs is little bit vague, especially non English native speaker.
For a clarity and consistency with other title of sports MVP categories, I want to change the category name to Category:Major League Soccer MVP award winners like Category:Major League Baseball MVP award winners
What do you think of my opinion?
Footwiks (talk) Footwiks (talk) 11:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If you agree name change of category title - Category:Major League Soccer MVP award winners, I'll move articles to new Category:Major League Soccer MVP award winners.Footwiks (talk) 12:38, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand, Footwiks. What articles are you going to move? As I said, the category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, MLS award winners such as Guillermo Barros Schelotto, Landon Donovan, Currentely these players are classified as Category:Major League Soccer MVPs‎
For a clarity and consistency with other title of sports MVP categories, I want to classify MLS award winners as Category:Major League Soccer MVP award winners‎.Footwiks (talk) 02:39, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per WP:OCAWARD, award winners categories are routinely deleted with rare exception (e.g. the Nobel prize is an exception). Marcocapelle (talk) 17:03, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 12:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Marcocapelle. GiantSnowman 13:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Listify (if necessary) then Delete as we usually do with AWARD categories. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Resonant trans-Neptunian objects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not precise enough to understand the purpose of these categories, which are about trans-Neptunian object in various orbital resonances with Neptune. By convention, it is not necessary to specify Neptune for resonant TNOs. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:42, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

20th-century sportsmen

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 January 6#20th-century sportsmen

Category:Violence against Aboriginal Australians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: For consistency with the parent and sub-category. Mitch Ames (talk) 04:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is not one consistently used format, we also have e.g. Category:Australian Aboriginal cultural history and Category:Films about Aboriginal Australians. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's true that we don't have consistency everywhere, and it would be better if we did. In the meantime, we can fix individual categories where it is reasonable. For my specific proposal, note that "Aboriginal" is a subset of "Indigenous" (the latter also includes Torres Strait Islanders), so the current "Massacres of Indigenous Australians" as a subcat of "Violence against Aboriginal Australians" is not just inconsistent, it is incorrect. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename — for consistency here, and to encourage future consistency. The main article is Indigenous Australians.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose until the wider array of naming is standardised at the larger project, piecemeal and random changes such as these do not help going toward any reasonable process of commonly agreed determination of what acceptable usage actually is. Consistency at this point is of no help to anyone, and is not 'reasonable'. JarrahTree 02:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • WP:IDLI, WP:CITINGGREATERPROBLEMS. It's already been "standardised at the larger project". The nominator has already pointed to the existing parent and children. I've already showed the main article. We generally don't do dozens or hundreds of categories (waste of tagging and processing time), we do them piecemeal as exemplars. After discussion here is closed, others are handled speedily.
      William Allen Simpson (talk) 03:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • until the wider array of naming is standardised at the larger project — Please provide a link to the relevant discussions about addressing this problem - I look forward to reading your positive suggestions and contributions about how to address the matter. Mitch Ames (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Consistency at this point is of no help to anyone, and is not 'reasonable'. — As I previously mentioned, independently of consistency, the current category structure is factually wrong - Indigenous Australians‎ are not a subset of Aboriginal Australians, so Massacres of Indigenous Australians‎ cannot be a subcategory of Violence against Aboriginal Australians. However I'm happy consider your alternative proposal for fixing the factual error. Mitch Ames (talk) 04:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Present empires

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 07:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Present empires (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    • Propose deleting Category:American Empire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    • Propose deleting Category:Chinese Empire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    • Propose deleting Category:New Russian Empire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: These do not actually exist, and are not common usage. Very recent creation that interferes with well established naming conventions. May require MANUAL REVERT to previous categories.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_29&oldid=1131890738"