Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 June 30

< June 29 July 1 >

June 30

Category:Play characters by year of introduction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Nominator blocked as sockpuppet so I'm closing this discussion which hasn't elicited any response. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Play characters by year of introduction (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: I would like the Wikipedia category Play characters by year of introduction to be removed because Kjell Knudde, the Wikipedia account created the Wkipedia category:Theatre characters by year of introduction. TheChangeLover (talk) 14:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Play characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Nominator blocked as sockpuppet so I'm closing this discussion which hasn't elicited any response. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Play characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: I would like the Wikipedia category Play characters to be removed because Kjell Knudde, the Wikipedia account created the Wkipedia category:Theatre characters. TheChangeLover (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Frisian botanists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: upmerge to Category:Frisian scientists. ✗plicit 12:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Frisian botanists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Frisian is not a nationality, at least not for the solitary entry. Rathfelder (talk) 08:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Frisian scientists

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 July 26#Category:Frisian scientists

Category:People Born in Union City, New Jersey

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 12:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: We categorize people in "people from FOO" categories, not "people born in FOO" categories. "People from" can encompass "people born in". Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:49, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support we do not categorize people by place of birth, but by where they are from. So we should only merge people who are clearly from the place in question. Not those who were born there but who moved elsewhere when very young.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have seen many users state that they do categorize by place of birth, using the appropriate "People from FOO" category. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I can well imagine that place of birth is not always relevant e.g. when you live in a small town but are born in a hospital in a nearby city. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:37, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I conceptually agree with JPL but in many cases reliable sources say a person is "from" somewhere and don't really elaborate on what that means so it may be hard to apply in practice. Support the proposal with that caveat. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. We don't use two separate categories. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Romanian professional boxers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Romanian professional boxers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: We categorize boxers on their nationality and gender, such as Category:Romanian male boxers and Category:Mexican women boxers. No other country has this sub-category of professional boxers. JTtheOG (talk) 00:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Political and economic think tanks based in Karachi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft delete/merge as nominated (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 19:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Political and economic think tanks based in Sindh
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING (WP:SMALLCAT and WP:OCLOCATION)
The only thing in the parent category is the subcategory and the only thing in the subcategory is the Pakistan Institute of International Affairs. There might be a bit of growth potential beyond the 1 article but there are only 19 articles total under Category:Think tanks based in Pakistan and no other countries have this city-level breakdown for think tanks. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Niskanen Center

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:Niskanen Center
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING (WP:OCASSOC)
The Niskanen Center is an American liberal think thank and this category contains every single biography article mentioned anywhere in the main article regardless of how they're associated. Jerry Taylor is definitely defined by being the group's president and Will Wilkinson might arguably be defined by being fired by them. The association with all the rest of the articles is so weak that none even mention this organization. The category contents are already listified in the sense that they are somewhere in the main article. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_June_30&oldid=1035568006"