Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter 2008/2009

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:SNOW. The weather forecast can often be wrong, but this also isn't the place. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Winter 2008/2009

Wikipedia is not a forcasting service triwbe (talk) 12:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —triwbe (talk) 12:42, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All of the information in that article belongs on a weather forecasting website, and not on Wikipedia. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:45, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per a loose application of WP:CRYSTAL. I can't imagine the winter as a whole will be particularly notable, much less a weather forecast for a specific area. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 12:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. JohnCD (talk) 12:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this is WP:SNOW. Would a passing admin please consider ? --triwbe (talk) 13:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not The Weather Channel or Farmer's Almanac. I think I see some crystal snow in this article's future. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 14:29, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.