Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volume Fourteen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volume Fourteen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously bundled in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volume Fifteen in 2006 (no consensus to delete), which were all renominated and deleted in September 2012. It appears this one was just missed in the renom as it shares the same notability concerns. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:58, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. For whatever reason, the original mass delete didn't mention this article -- but the same reasons still apply.--Larry (talk) 19:12, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.