Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velo Vie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Velo Vie

Velo Vie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally prodded in 2010, and the article has not seen any more sigcov. There is a review on one of their bicycles but it seems to be more about the bike than the company, barely counting as one source. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 16:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Arizona. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 16:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:43, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: hardly any coverage [1], this is all I can find. Nothing else, no mentions of the company. Oaktree b (talk) 01:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft-deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom and Oaktree b. Owen× ☎ 23:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.