Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uparichara Vasu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 18:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uparichara Vasu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability, no news sources and what's published in a few books is not enough Australianblackbelt (talk) 12:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it’s not evident why we should expect news sources for a character in the Mahabharata. A couple of old books is exactly what we need. Mccapra (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article is rather confusing, I'm still not sure what this fellow is. Needs an introduction and a much better summary... Oaktree b (talk) 14:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Oaktree b: In short, a ruler in the Mahabharata..💠245CMR💠.•^👥📜 03:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I can find sources but copy editing is required..💠245CMR💠.•^👥📜 03:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - definitely needs work, but being a king, well, kinda notable. Plus searching in Google Books comes up with other sources, such as this in Sustainable Bamboo Development, and this, and this. Plus sourcing for current unsourced info can also be found, for example the story about Matsyagandha can be cited through this in Harivamsha, and this. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.