Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tor2Door

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sourcing is insufficient Star Mississippi 15:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tor2Door

Tor2Door (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:WEBCRIT. MarioGom (talk) 13:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Internet, and Websites. MarioGom (talk) 13:18, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: while not more than a stub at this point, coverage by WRIC, Bitcoin.com News and others suggest notability. There is also academic literature coverage, likely with more information. Owen× ☎ 16:33, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Some limited coverage for this "thing" [1] and [2] but I don't think it's enough for sourcing an article. Oaktree b (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The "Tor2Door" article should be removed from Wikipedia because it details an illegal darknet market, potentially promoting unethical activities. This content conflicts with Wikipedia's commitment to responsible and ethical information sharing. --Loewstisch (talk) 15:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.