Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Clavier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Clavier

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not have many citations and is only known for allegations of sexual misconduct. Yolandagonzales (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, and Christianity. Yolandagonzales (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Owen× ☎ 13:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and Arkansas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment well not quite. He was the primate of the Anglican Church in America until his resignation in 1995. Additional sources: [1][2]--Jahaza (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does that mean he was closer to "good mates with the Archbishop of Canterbury" than "some vicar in a church"? MNewnham (talk) 23:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, quite the opposite, given the Anglican Church in America is a splinter church that isn't part of the Anglican Communion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Episcopal bishops, like Catholic ones, almost always have enough sources for notability (though sometimes the sources are offline), and this one seems if anything particularly notable.— Moriwen (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Moriwen: That is the case with bishops of the Episcopal Church of the United States of America (ECUSA) and other Episcopal churches of the Anglican Communion. However, I have just corrected the article to reflect the fact that the subject is not an ECUSA bishop but is rather part of a Continuing Anglican denomination. Unlike bishops of the Anglican Communion, bishops of obscure splinter denominations cannot be assumed to be notable. Graham (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~:Keep per reasoning by @Moriwen and @Jahaza. Ominateu (talk) 17:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)~~ striking comment by confirmed, blocked sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 19:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.