Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Maka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Maka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, an Australian rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Given his age and ongoing career, draftification seems to be a good ATD. JTtheOG (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Australia. JTtheOG (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Think there's just about enough in the article and a search for a weak keep here, especially as the players career is just starting. Draftification a suitable WP:ATD if deemed not. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: Top stories for sources online! Per ATD, this is a case of TOOSOON and the best option is draftifying and marked as "promised draft". Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.