Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subway Serial Rape: Lover Hunting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subway Serial Rape: Lover Hunting

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NFILM; significant RS coverage not found. Sourcing is unselective databases or not about the film in question. "Best Film at the Pink Grand Prix" is not a significant award as it's based on a fan poll. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 12:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Above characterization of sourcing appears correct. Also, these Translates are going to look very bad in my browser history :p --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination because subject fails WP:NFILM. For the umpteenth time, Wikipedia is not the place for exhaustive listings of random inormation. -The Gnome (talk) 13:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.