Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Hansa Bhagwan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Nimbarka Sampradaya#Sri Hansa Bhagwan. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Hansa Bhagwan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:GNG. Perhaps redirect to Nimbarka Sampradaya. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I support the redirect call. Chronikhiles ^(talk) 14:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(1st choice) Delete, (2nd choice) redirect to Nimbarka Sampradaya#Sri Hansa Bhagwan. This is an article that has existed for two years. It consists of a lead and six sections. Section 1 is not in English. The article is so badly written that there appears to be no relationship between the lead and the sections. The article's main source is a book called: Srimad-Bhagavatam by A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada published by the International Society for Krishna Consciousness;^[1] this is a modern interpretation of the Brahma Sutras (and therefore has POV issues). There are some other sources, but the Wikipedia article does not give their titles.

The section on Sri Hansa Bhagwan in Nimbarka Sampradaya does not have any citations. So I am a bit worried that it might be deleted, and then we would be left with a redirect to an article that did not mention the topic of the redirect. Because of this, I think deletion would be a better option than changing to a redirect.-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.