Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saty Narayan Ji Mandir, Nabha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saty Narayan Ji Mandir, Nabha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable temple in Nabha. Could not find third party RS for wide coverage. The references in the article are about generic Hindu facts, not the temple. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Many more references are listed in an earlier version of the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saty_Narayan_Ji_Mandir,_Nabha&oldid=663778039 Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eastmain, the earlier version of the article has WP:UNDUE unrelated text copy-pasted as a WP:CFORK of Jagannath Temple article. The many RS in the version are about the deity Jagannath temple of Puri, not the Nabha temple. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 21:39, 31 August 2021 (IST)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nomination and their reply to Eastmain. TrangaBellam (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:as per nomination.defcon5 (talk) 05:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.