Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sant Sri Asaramji Ashram (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sant Sri Asaramji Ashram

Non notable organization with no reliabel sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 23:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 23:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. At first glance it seems like it could be notable. Needs clean-up and referencing. At least one mention in a newspaper would be good to see. Only month old, give it a chance to grow.Yobmod (talk) 11:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reliable sources from leading newspaper are there. Upto notability guidelines.--rohitom (talk) 11:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate all of the hard work you put into creating this article. My concern is that the article is not the subject of secondary sources. The references listed only mention the ashram in their articles, these are passing references and do not help to establish notability. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 12:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable alone. Possible merge to Asaram Bapu. None of the references cited for this article focus on the ashram as its subject. The ashram, in each reference, is only mentined in the article as part of a larger subject. No reference is devoted to the subject. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 12:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.